Impact of Technology Readiness and Techno Stress on Teacher Engagement in Higher Secondary Schools

Authors

  • Genimon Vadakkemulanjanal Joseph Vimal Jyothi Institute of Management and Research https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6115-1097
  • Kennedy Andrew Thomas Christ University, Bangalore- 560029, India
  • Alex Nero Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research, Bangalore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2021.40.51-65

Keywords:

Technology Readiness, Teacher Engagement, Work Engagement, Techno Stress

Abstract

Rapid technology advancements resulted a fundamental shift in the education sector which redefined the teaching-learning process and teacher engagement. Based on numerous studies on work engagement models and technology readiness, this study explores, how the teachers’ readiness to embrace educational technologies, impact on teacher engagement. With stratified cluster sampling model, data were collected from principals, managers, students and 122 faulty were participated in this quantitative study using standardized tools. Teachers were highly engaged with students-colleagues and varied across experience/age groups. Technology readiness factors positively impacted on social engagements with students-colleagues. As education technology usage is exponential, more future research is needed.

Author Biographies

Genimon Vadakkemulanjanal Joseph, Vimal Jyothi Institute of Management and Research

Vice Principal

Kennedy Andrew Thomas, Christ University, Bangalore- 560029, India

Director, CEDBEC,

Alex Nero, Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research, Bangalore

Assistant Professor

References

Adams, R. E. (2018). Ancient civilizations of the New World. Routledge.

Ahlers, E. (2016). Flexible and remote work in the context of digitization and occupational health. International Journal of Labour Research, 8(1/2), 85.

Al-Fudail, M., & Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1103-1110.

Avis, J. (2018). Socio-technical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution and its implications for vocational education and training: a literature review. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 70(3), 337-363.

Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & stress, 22(3), 187-200.

Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current directions in psychological science, 20(4), 265-269.

Brown, Malcolm, Joanne Dehoney, Nancy Millichap (2015). The Next Generation Digital Learning Environment A Report on Research. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative

Carretero, S.; Vuorikari, R. and Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight profi¬ciency levels and examples of use, EUR 28558 EN, doi:10.2760/38842

Cech, F., & Tellioglu, H. (2019). Impact of the Digital Transformation: An Online Real-Time Delphi Study. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.11411.

Çoklar, A. N., Efilti, E., & Şahin, Y. L. (2019). Technostress as a Factor Affecting the Use of Technology by Beginning Teachers. In Handbook of Research on Faculty Development for Digital Teaching and Learning (pp. 460-480). IGI Global.

Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Basic Books.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2020). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Hachette UK.

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 15(1), 3-8.

David Agogo, Traci Hess (2015), Technostress and Technology Induced State Anxiety: Scale Development and Implications, Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth 2015

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.

Dearing, J. W., & Cox, J. G. (2018). Diffusion of innovations theory, principles, and practice. Health Affairs, 37(2), 183-190.

Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2019). Exploring the Structural Relationship Among Teachers’ Technostress, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), Computer Self-efficacy and School Support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-11.

Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and teacher education, 67, 53-66.

Efilti, K., & Çoklar, A. N. (2019). Teachers' Technostress Levels as an Indicator of Their Psychological Capital Levels. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 413-421.

Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441-449.

Huang, W. (2018, May). Research on the Talent Training of Colleges and Universities under the Background of Industry 4.0. In 2018 8th International Conference on Social science and Education Research (SSER 2018). Atlantis Press.

Jandrić, P. (2015). The Diffusionist Model of Adoption of Digital Learning, Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory ,1-6. 0.1007/978-981-287-532-7_308-1

Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, N. H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers & Education, 95, 114-122.

Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.

Jones, W. Monty & Dexter, Sara. (2014). How teachers learn: The roles of formal, informal, and independent learning. In Educational Technology Research and Development 62. 367–384

Joseph, G. V., & Thomas, K. A. (2020). Moderating effect of Social Media Usage on Technology Barriers to Technology Adoption by Teachers. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology. 29(03), 5504-5512. Retrieved from http://sersc.org/journals/ index.php/IJAST/article/view/6058

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.

Kahn, W. A., & Heaphy, E. D. (2013). Relational contexts of personal engagement at work. In Employee engagement in theory and practice (pp. 96-110). Routledge.

Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142

KITE, Kerala., Little KITES (2020) details retrieved from https://kite.kerala.gov.in/littlekites/lkms/

Klassen, R. M., Yerdelen, S., & Durksen, T. L. (2013). Measuring Teacher Engagement: Development of the Engaged Teachers Scale (ETS). Frontline Learning Research, 1(2), 33-52.

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.

Langer, A. M., & Yorks, L. (2018). Strategic Information Technology: Best Practices to Drive Digital Transformation. John Wiley & Sons.

Lewin, D. & Lundie, D. Stud Philos Educ (2016) Philosophies of Digital Pedagogy, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35, 235-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9514-7

Lim, J., & Newby, T. J. (2019). Preservice teachers’ Web 2.0 experiences and perceptions on Web 2.0 as a personal learning environment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1-27.

Livingstone, Sonia(2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education, Oxford Review of Education,38-1, 9-24

Mancz. Linda Reider. (2014). Teacher Engagement and Student Success in Critical Times (Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University).

Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., Leiter, M. P., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schwab, R. L. (1986). Maslach burnout inventory (Vol. 21, pp. 3463-3464). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting psychologists press.

Mourtzis, D. (2018, June). Development of Skills and Competences in Manufacturing Towards Education 4.0: A Teaching Factory Approach. In International Conference on the Industry 4.0 model for Advanced Manufacturing (pp. 194-210). Springer, Cham.

Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373-384.

Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of service research, 2(4), 307-320.

Prensky, Marc. (2001) Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1, On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Prensky, M. R. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Corwin Press.

Punie, Y Christine.Redecker (2017), DigCompEdu, Assessing Educators' Digital Competence, EUR 28558 EN,

Rojas-Méndez, J. I., Parasuraman, A., & Papadopoulos, N. (2017). Demographics, attitudes, and technology readiness: A cross-cultural analysis and model validation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(1), 18-39.

Rogers Everett, M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, 12.

Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.

Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology, 21(7), 600-619.

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.

Skues J.L. & E.G. Cunningham (2013). The role of e-learning coaches in Australian secondary schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29-2. 179-187

Suhonen, J. (2005). A formative development method for digital learning environments in sparse learning communities. University of Joensuu.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.

Wallace, A. (2013, September). Social learning platforms and the flipped classroom. In 2013 Second International Conference on E-Learning and E-Technologies in Education (ICEEE) (pp. 198-200). IEEE.

Webster, M. D. (2016). Examining philosophy of technology using grounded theory methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2), Art. 5.

Welsh, D., & Fischer, C. (2016). Social and linguistic change in the era of the digital economy (I4. 0).

Yerdelen, S., Durksen, T., & Klassen, R. M. (2018). An international validation of the engaged teacher scale. Teachers and Teaching, 24(6), 673-689.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-27

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles