The Retopian Approach to Art



Palabras clave:

Contemporary Art, Reconstructive Utopia, Agency, Utopian Mental Picture, Political Imagination, Retopia


In contemporary art there has been a resurgent interest in returning to the idea of Utopia. However 500 years after Thomas More the meaning of the word utopia has become more complex than in the 16th century: is utopia a outopia or a eutopia?  This paper argues the need for a classification of the use of the term of utopia in the context of contemporary art. Is Utopia a contemporary outopia (as shown by artists like Thomas Hirschhorn) that reflects a critical use of the term but excludes any possibility of social change and is pessimistic about artistic agency. Is utopia a contemplative utopia (as artists like Liam Gillick propose) that acknowledges transformative potential of a reality transcending concept but does not articulate any agency? Can the social and political change be achieved through activism without a mental utopian picture (as aimed for in the projects of WochenKlausur)? Or are all three basic attitudes toward utopia in contemporary art a reduction of the transformative potential of utopia because none of them connects a utopian mental picture with the concept of political agency?  Based on a critical reevaluation of Lewis Mumford’s idea of “reconstructive utopia” the concept of retopia is an attempt to revive utopia as a suggestive device that links a utopian mental picture with political agency. The retopia is a reconstructive eutopia that does not make any claim on human nature and avoids abstract universals by explicitly grounding the utopian project in the local environment. Retopia has the claim to be put into practice through social experimentation. A retopian approach to contemporary art (and politics) has the potential to reintroduce reality transcending political concepts that do not replicate the authoritarian cul de sacs of past utopias while at the same time reaffirm the catalyst function of utopian thinking.


Biografía del autor/a

Dirk Hoyer, Tallinn University Baltic Film Media Arts and Communication School

Dirk Hoyer is the author of “(ap)art Contemporary Art and Utopia” (Helsinki: Aalto Arts Books, 2015) . The monograph is part of the artistic research project on the role of utopia in contemporary art and culture which also resulted in the documentary film “(ap)art” which has been shown in the Research Pavilion of the Venice Biennale 2015. He holds a Doctor of Arts of the Aalto Arts University Helsinki. In 2016 Hoyer received the Finnish Cultural Foundation Grant for his artistic research project “Strawberry Desert”. Hoyer is a researcher and lecturer at the Baltic Film Media Arts and Communication School in Tallinn.



Bloch, E. (1986). The Principle of Hope (reprint ed. 1995). Plaice, N., Plaice, S., & Knight, P. (trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Vol 3:3.

Bolaños, P. A. (2007). The Critical Role of Art: Adorno between Utopia and Dystopia. Kritike: Online Journal of Philosophy, vol 1, no 1 (June 2007). Retrieved January 12th, 2017.

Carducci, V. (2012, Feb 1). Envisioning Real Utopias in Detroit. Motown Review of Art. Retrieved December 17th, 2014.

Carducci, Vincent. (2015, Jan). On Art and Gentrification. Infinite Mile. Retrieved April, 16, 2017.

Galapagos (2014). Galapagos Art Space, New York/Detroit. Retrieved November 12th, 2014.

Galapagos (2017). Website of Galapagos Art Space, New York/Detroit. Retrieved April 16th, 2017.

Gillick, Liam (2009). Utopia Station: For a Functional Utopia. In R. Noble (Ed.), Utopias (pp.154-157), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gillick, Liam (2003). For a Functional Utopia. Published as part of Utopia Station, Venice Biennale. Retrieved October 12th, 2014.

Jacoby, R. (1999). The End of Utopia: Politics and Culture in an Age of Apathy. New York: Basic Books.

Hirschhorn, Thomas (2005). Utopia. Utopia = One World, One War, One Army, One Dress. Exhibiton brochure. Boston, MA: Institute of Contemporary Art; San Francisco, CA: CCA Wattis Institute for Contemporary Arts.

Levitas, Ruth (2005). The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society or Why Sociologist and Others Should Take Utopia More Seriously. Inaugural Lecture. University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. 24.10.2005. Retrieved February 2nd, 2015.

Levitas, Ruth (2011). The Concept of Utopia. Witney: Peter Lang.

Mumford, Lewis (2008). The Story of Utopias. New York: Boni and Liveright. (Original work published 1922).

Noble, Richard (ed.). (2009). Utopias: Documents of Contemporary Art. London: Whitechapel Gallery; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Noble, Richard (2009). The Lure of Utopia. Exhibition Catalogue. ARKEN Museum of Modern Art, Ishøj, Denmark.

Weiss, Rachel (2007). Utopiary. In Rüsen, J., Fehr, M., & Rieger, T. W. (eds.). Thinking Utopia: Steps into Other Worlds. (pp. 190- 204), New York: Berghahn Books.

Swanson, C. (2015, Jan 2). Is Soho in the ’70s Just a Two-Hour Flight Away? 9 Artists on Why They Live in Detroit. Retrieved September 25th, 2016.

Thompson, P., & Žižek, S. (eds). (2013). The Privatization of Hope: Ernst Bloch and the Future of Utopia. Durham: Duke University Press.

Wochenklausur (2009). Art and Sociopolitical Intervention. In R. Noble (Ed.), Utopias (pp.79 -81) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

WochenKlausur (2003). Art and Sociopolitical Intervention. Retrieved January 25th, 2015.

Wallerstein, I. (1998). Utopistics. Or, Historical Choices of the Twenty-first Century. NewYork: The New Press.

Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.