ISSN: 2013-2255

Preliminary validation of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in aspiring firefighters: an exploratory factor analysis

Mireia Cano-Gallent a

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0325-5320

Jordi Niñerola-i-Maymí a, b

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0877-8162

Anna Roca-Martínez a

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3736-6295

Anna Figueras-Masip a

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9747-6839

a Institut de Seguretat Pública de Catalunya. Spain.

b Corresponding author: Ctra. C-17 Barcelona-Ripoll, km 13,5. 08100 Mollet del Vallès (Vallès oriental. Spain). Email: ispc-seleccio@gencat.cat

Original article. Received: 07/11/2022. Revised: 04/05/2023. Accepted: 25/05/2023. Advanced pub.: 07/09/2023. Published: 02/01/2024.

Abstract

Background. There are few studies on emotional regulation in members of safety and emergency services. However, those that are to be found in the scientific literature indicate the benefits and risks that the use of certain strategies exerts on emotional regulation. Here, a preliminary study for the validation and adaptation of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire is presented.

Methods. The study sample comprised 239 aspiring firefighters (92.89 % male and 7.11 % female), aged 23-43 years.

Results. The results revealed a structure of nine factors and two suprafactors, which reduced the number of items to 32. The new model explains 63 % of the variability of the data. The scale used has good internal consistency despite the changes in dimensionality. As for the reliability of the factors, analysis indicates temporal stability, and also temporal stability between the two suprafactors, showing high correlations between administrations.

Conclusions. The results obtained are similar to those recorded for the original version and for the validation in Spanish, maintaining the original factor structure. One difference observed is the behaviour of the suprafactors in aspiring firefighters, suggesting that in order to pass the basic training course, candidates need to combine both strategies (adaptive and less adaptive).

Keywords

CERQ, firefighter, emotional regulation, exploratory factor analysis.

Recommended reference

Cano-Gallent, M., Niñerola-i-Maymí, J., Roca-Martínez, A., & Figueras-Masip, A. (2024). Preliminary validation of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in aspiring firefighters: an exploratory factor analysis. REIRE Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 17(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire.42270

 

© 2024 The authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

 

Títol (català)

Validació preliminar del Qüestionari de regulació emocional cognitiva (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, CERQ) en aspirants a bomber: anàlisi factorial exploratòria

[L’article sencer en català es pot descarregar a https://doi.org/10.1344/reire.42270]

Resum

Antecedents. Hi ha pocs estudis sobre la regulació emocional en membres dels cossos de seguretat i emergències. Així i tot, hi ha estudis científics que indiquen els beneficis i riscos de l’ús de determinades estratègies en la regulació emocional. L’objectiu d’aquest estudi és validar i adaptar el Qüestionari de regulació emocional cognitiva (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, CERQ).

Mètode. Hi van participar 239 aspirants a bomber (92,89 % homes i 7,11 % dones), d’entre 23 i 43 anys.

Resultats. Els resultats van mostrar una estructura de 9 factors i 2 suprafactors, amb una reducció a 32 ítems. El nou model explica el 63 % de la variabilitat de les dades. L’escala té bona consistència interna, tot i els canvis de dimensionalitat. Pel que fa a la fiabilitat dels factors, té estabilitat temporal, així com entre els 2 suprafactors, amb correlacions altes entre les administracions.

Conclusions. Els resultats obtinguts són similars a la versió original i a la validació en espanyol, i mantenen l’estructura factorial. Una diferència observada és el comportament dels suprafactors en els aspirants a bomber, la qual cosa ens porta a inferir que per superar el curs de formació bàsica és necessari combinar ambdues estratègies (adaptatives i menys adaptatives).

Paraules clau

CERQ, bomber, regulació emocional, anàlisi factorial exploratòria.

Título (castellano)

Validación preliminar del Cuestionario de regulación emocional cognitiva (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, CERQ) en aspirantes a bombero: análisis factorial exploratorio

[La versión completa en castellano de este artículo se puede descargar en https://doi.org/10.1344/reire.42270]

Resumen

Antecedentes. Hay pocos estudios sobre la regulación emocional en miembros de cuerpos de seguridad y emergencias. Aun así, hay estudios científicos que indican los beneficios y riesgos del uso de determinadas estrategias en la regulación emocional. El objetivo de este estudio es validar y adaptar el Cuestionario de regulación emocional cognitiva (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, CERQ).

Método. Participaron 239 aspirantes a bombero (92,89 % hombres y 7,11 % mujeres), entre los 23 y 43 años.

Resultados. Los resultados mostraron una estructura de nueve factores y dos suprafactores, con una reducción a 32 ítems. El nuevo modelo consigue explicar el 63 % de la variabilidad de los datos. La escala utilizada tiene buena consistencia interna a pesar de los cambios de dimensionalidad. En cuanto a la fiabilidad de los factores del cuestionario, tiene estabilidad temporal, así como entre los dos suprafactores mostrando correlaciones altas entre las administraciones.

Conclusiones. Los resultados obtenidos son parecidos a la versión original y a la validación en español, manteniendo su estructura factorial. Una diferencia observada es el comportamiento de los suprafactores en los aspirantes a bombero, llevándonos a inferir que para superar el curso de formación básica es necesario combinar ambas estrategias (adaptativas y menos adaptativas).

 

Palabras clave

CERQ, bombero, regulación emocional, análisis factorial exploratorio.

 

1. Introduction

Emotion regulation is one of the professional skills considered most important in the training of aspiring firefighters. As Evans (2019) pointed out, the intense demands placed on fire service personnel, together with the benefits and risks associated with the emotions experienced and the strategies used to manage them, pose a real challenge in this profession. In this vein, Ferreira (2013) stated that firefighters and other professional groups involved in medical emergencies or rescue operations are exposed to stressful situations that increase the risk of developing different psychopathological disorders.

The findings published in the scientific literature demonstrate the fundamental role of emotion and coping with it in this group, and there are a large number of references on the importance of the role of emotion regulation in relation to different factors that affect the lives of firefighters. For example, Huang et al. (2019) demonstrated the importance of emotion regulation in the prevention of posttraumatic stress in Chinese firefighters who had suffered a stressful shock. Other studies obtained similar results in samples of firefighters from other countries such as South Korea (Lee, 2019) and the United States (Paltell et al., 2019; Smith et al., 2011).

Other studies examining emotional coping style in the firefighting profession showed a relationship between poor Emotion regulation and certain clinical symptomatology such as insomnia, increased risk of depression (Hom et al., 2016), alcohol consumption (Smith et al., 2011) and anxiety (Khadem et al., 2017).

In this sense, an important contribution to the psychometric assessment of emotion regulation at the cognitive level was the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001). This instrument has been widely used by the scientific community, and has been translated and psychometrically adapted to a large number of culturally disparate languages such as Persian (Abdi et al., 2012), Chinese (Li & Wu, 2020) and Japanese (Fujisato et al., 2017). There are different validations of its psychometric properties in Spanish, both in Latin America (Dominguez Lara & Medrano, 2016a) and in a Spanish sample (Domínguez-Sánchez et al., 2013).

The CERQ has been used in a wide range of samples such as people with fibromyalgia (Reche Camba, 2019), patients with different psychopathological disorders (Potthoff et al., 2016), as well as in different samples according to age (Navarro-Loli et al., 2020) or university students (Dominguez Lara & Medrano, 2016b). In to the case of firefighters, the use of the CERQ has been limited to the study of coping strategies in relation to posttraumatic stress disorder (Mashhadi et al., 2018) and suicidal ideation (Kim & Yook, 2018; Park et al., 2022).

However, no references to the use of the CERQ in samples of firefighters in Spain or Latin America have been found, even though it is essential to have a method of analysis to identify the emotion regulation capacities of firefighters, especially in the initial training stage of the profession, in order to achieve better professional performance.

The main objective of this research was thus to conduct a preliminary study of the validation and adaptation of the Spanish version of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Domínguez-Sánchez et al., 2013) in a sample of aspiring firefighters of the Generalitat de Catalunya. The validation of the questionnaire was performed through an analysis of its factorial structure, reliability, and internal consistency.

The first specific objective was to describe the factorial structure/dimensionality of the Spanish version of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in aspiring firefighters, using the exploratory factor analysis technique. A second objective was to analyse the reliability and internal consistency of the nine factors of the CERQ as determined by dimensionality analysis.

In accordance with our objectives, we put forth the following hypotheses:

  1. 1)Based on previous research (Garnefski et al., 2001; Reche Camba, 2019), we expected to find that the resulting model would fit the nine factors corresponding to the nine emotion regulation strategies (Figure 1). The nine-factor model may take two formats: 

  1. a.Nine-factor model by clustering CERQ items (Self-blame, Acceptance, Rumination, Positive focusing, Refocus on planning, Positive reappraisal, Putting into perspective, Catastrophising, and Other-blame). 

  2. b.Model with nine specific factors distributed among two suprafactors referring to "Adaptive" (Acceptance, Positive Focusing, Refocus on planning, Positive reappraisal and Putting into perspective) and "Less Adaptive" (Self-blame, Rumination, Catastrophising and Other-blame) strategies. 

  1. 2)Adequate levels of reliability or internal consistency were expected to be found in the different subscales of the CERQ. Recommendations from the scientific literature (Frías-Navarro, 2022) require values above 0.70 in Cronbach's alpha for the nine subscales to determine an optimal correlation among the construct items. 

Figure 1

Theoretical model CERQ with 36 items

 
 

 

2. Method

2.1. Sample

The sample comprised 239 subjects, of whom 227 (94.98%) responded to the first administration of the CERQ at the beginning of the basic training course and 137 (57.32%) responded to the second administration of the CERQ at the end of the training course. A total of 125 subjects (52.72%) responded to both administrations of the questionnaire (Figure 2).

Of the total number of applicants in our sample (Table 1), 222 (92.89%) were male and 17 (7.11%) were female. The ages of this class of firefighter candidates ranged from 23 to 43 years, with an average of 32.61 years (standard deviation ± 4.829).

At the end of the course, 98.79% were considered to have passed the Basic Training Course for Firefighters and went on to the next stage of the competitive examination process, while 1.21% dropped out during the course and consequently did not progress to the next stage of the process.

Figure 2

Graph of the sample of aspiring firefighters according to the process of administration of the CERQ

 

 

Table 1

Descriptive statistics of sample of aspiring firefighters

 

Sample CERQ-B

Total applicants for the Basic Firefighter Training Course 2022

 

N total

Mean age

Average SD

N passed

% Passed BTCF

Male

222

31

4.862

227

92.27 %

Female

17

32

4.556

19

7.73 %

Total

239

31

4.836

246

100 %

 

2.2. Evaluation instrument

The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, CERQ (Garnefski et al., 2001) a multidimensional questionnaire constructed to identify the cognitive emotion regulation strategies, or cognitive coping strategies, that people use after experiencing negative events or situations – was used to conduct the study. The CERQ is a self-report questionnaire that is used internationally for both research and diagnostic purposes and can be used as a general or specific coping questionnaire (Reche Camba, 2019).

The CERQ (table 2) is a 36-item questionnaire that assesses nine dimensions consisting of four items each. Item responses for each subscale are five-point Likert-type (1 = hardly ever to 5 = almost always). Dimension scores can range from 4 to 20, revealing that higher scores correspond to a higher frequency of use of that specific strategy.

Below are the definitions by different authors of the nine dimensions into which the 36 CERQ items are distributed:

  1. a.Self-blame: A cognitive process in which the individual attributes blame to oneself for what one has experienced (Jermann et al., 2006). Blame often has implications for individuals' emotions and behaviours during and after stressful situations. 

  2. b.Acceptance: The cognitive process of trying to live with the stressful situation without generating negative emotions and referring to thoughts of resignation to what has happened (Carver et al., 1989, cited by Garnefski et al., 2002). 

  3. c.Rumination: This consists of focusing thoughts on gravity, sustained over time (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 1994, cited by Garnefski et al., 2002), the event and its possible consequences (Fernández Cruz et al., 2020). 

  4. d.Positive refocusing: This consists of directing attention to pleasant thoughts that diminish the effect of the stressful situation. It requires not focusing exclusively on the negative consequences of an event, but looking for the least negative aspects (Fernández Cruz et al., 2020). 

  5. e.Refocus on planning: This refers to thinking through the steps to be taken and how to manage negative events. We could say that this strategy is the cognitive part of coping focused on action, but it does not automatically imply that the actual behaviour will follow (Garnefski et al., 2017). 

  6. f.Positive reappraisal: Thoughts of acceptance of what is experienced and resignation to what has happened (Garnefski et al., 2017). These thoughts aim to assign a positive meaning to those negative events in terms of personal growth (Reche Camba, 2019).  

  7. g.Putting into perspective: This involves putting the stressful event into perspective by comparing it with others in order to relativise its severity (Fernández Cruz et al., 2020).  

  8. h.Catastrophising: This is the disproportionate and extremely serious anticipation of the ensuing consequences (Fernández Cruz et al., 2020). 

  9. i.Other-blame: Obsessive attribution of the cause of the action to others (Fernández Cruz et al., 2020). 

 

Table 2

Original questionnaire of 36-item Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)

 

       

(Casi) nunca

 

A veces

Regular-mente

A menudo

(Casi) siempre

1. Siento que soy el único culpable de lo que ha pasado

1

2

3

4

5

2. Creo que tengo que aceptar lo que ha pasado

1

2

3

4

5

3. Pienso a menudo en cómo me siento en relación con lo que me ha pasado

1

2

3

4

5

4. Pienso en algo más agradable que lo que me ha ocurrido

1

2

3

4

5

5. Pienso en qué es lo mejor que podría hacer

1

2

3

4

5

6. Creo que puedo aprender algo de la situación

1

2

3

4

5

7. Creo que todo podría haber sido mucho peor

1

2

3

4

5

8. A menudo pienso que lo que me ha pasado es mucho peor que lo que les ha ocurrido a otras personas

1

2

3

4

5

9. Me parece que otros son culpables de lo ocurrido

1

2

3

4

5

10. Me siento único/a responsable de lo ocurrido

1

2

3

4

5

11. Creo que tengo que aceptar la situación

1

2

3

4

5

12. Me preocupa lo que piense y sienta sobre lo que me ha pasado

1

2

3

4

5

13. Pienso en cosas agradables que nada tienen que ver con lo que me ha pasado

1

2

3

4

5

14. Pienso en cuál sería la mejor forma de enfrentarme a la situación

1

2

3

4

5

15. Creo que lo que ha pasado me puede hacer más fuerte

1

2

3

4

5

16. Creo que otras personas pasan por experiencias mucho peores

1

2

3

4

5

17. Sigo pensando en lo terrible que ha sido lo que me ha pasado

1

2

3

4

5

18. Me parece que otros son responsables de lo que ha ocurrido

1

2

3

4

5

19. Reflexiono sobre los errores que he cometido en este asunto

1

2

3

4

5

20. Creo que no puedo cambiar nada de lo ocurrido

1

2

3

4

5

21. Quiero entender por qué la experiencia que he tenido me hace sentir así

1

2

3

4

5

22. Pienso en algo agradable en vez de pensar en lo ocurrido

1

2

3

4

5

23. Pienso en cómo cambiar la situación

1

2

3

4

5

24. Creo que la situación tiene también su lado positivo

1

2

3

4

5

25. Creo que no ha sido tan malo en comparación a otras cosas

1

2

3

4

5

26. Frecuentemente pienso que lo que he sufrido es lo peor que le puede pasar a una persona

1

2

3

4

5

27. Pienso en los errores que otros han cometido en este asunto

1

2

3

4

5

28. Básicamente considero que la causa de lo que me ha ocurrido debe estar en mí mismo

1

2

3

4

5

29. Creo que debo aprender a vivir con ello

1

2

3

4

5

30. Pienso continuamente en los sentimientos que la situación ha provocado en mí

1

2

3

4

5

31. Pienso en experiencias agradables

1

2

3

4

5

32. Pienso en un plan acerca de lo mejor que podría hacer

1

2

3

4

5

33. Busco los aspectos positivos de la cuestión

1

2

3

4

5

34. Me digo que hay cosas peores en la vida

1

2

3

4

5

35. Pienso continuamente en lo horrible que ha sido la situación

1

2

3

4

5

36. Pienso que, básicamente, la culpa es de otros

1

2

3

4

5

Source: Domínguez-Sánchez et al. (2013).

2.3. Procedure

Initially, all students from the 23rd graduating class of the BTCF were invited to participate voluntarily. With this invitation, students were given the opportunity to participate in a study investigating the influence of training and experience on coping styles. Data were collected anonymously and voluntarily, and were handled with strict confidentiality.

The 239 subjects responded to the CERQ through the virtual platform, based on the Moodle 4.0 platform that allows the registration of surveys (Ros Martinez de la Hidalga, 2008), of the School of Firefighters, Civil Protection and Rural Agents of the Institut de Seguretat Pública de Catalunya.

The students who accepted the invitation responded to the CERQ questionnaire during two separate periods. The first administration of the questionnaire took place one month after the start of the course and the students had 11 days to respond to the invitation; the second administration took place one month before the end of the course, when they had another 11 days to answer the questionnaire.

2.4. Analysis

For data processing, the items belonging to the less adaptive strategies were recoded. The new measurement for each of the factors was interpreted as follows: obtaining low scores tends to a less adaptive strategy while the maximum scores show an adaptive strategy of the individuals, regardless of whether the items are part of the group of adaptive or less adaptive factors. This recoding at the time of analysis allowed a clearer and more accurate reading of the data obtained.

Three different analyses were carried out for the preliminary validation of the CERQ in firefighters.

First, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used to determine whether the structure of the variables in the different factors was maintained as reported by Garnefski et al. (2002). To carry out this analysis, we followed the recommendations of Ferrando et al. (2022) both in terms of sample size and data adequacy, as well as limiting the factorial weight to 0.5 to determine the inclusion of an item in a factor, using the same criteria established by Capdevila Ortís et al. (2004).

Secondly, once the structure for the CERQ model in firefighters had been established, the internal consistency (α Cronbach) and then test-retest reliability were analysed, using the nine factors and the two suprafactors that make up the structure of the CERQ model for our group of firefighters as a measure.

3. Results

In the results section, we will first focus on determining the structure of the model and whether it differs from the original model (Figure 1). To do this, a principal component analysis (with VARIMAX rotation) was performed, which explained 58.98% of the total variability of the data. To determine the dimensionality of the CERQ in firefighters, we excluded from the analysis those items with a factor loading of less than 0.5 and ensured that no item was represented in more than one factor. At the end of our review of the factor loadings (Table 3), we eliminated items 6, 8, 20 and 27 of the original version published by Garnefski et al. (2002), with factor loadings of 0.352, -0.035, 0.366 and 0.440 respectively.

Table 3

Factor weights of the 32 final CERQ items, distributed into nine factors

Factor

Item

CERQ factorial weight for firefighters

1

Acceptance

 

 

2. I think that I have to accept that this has happened

0.821

 

11. I think I have to accept the situation.

0.838

 

29. I think that I must learn to live with it

0.645

2

Positive refocusing

 

 

4. I think of nicer things than what I have experienced

0.801

 

13. I think of pleasant things that have nothing to do with it

0.850

 

22. I think of something nice instead of what has happened

0.857

 

31. I think about pleasant experiences

0.556

3

Refocus on planning

 

 

5. I think of what I can do best

0.727

 

14. I think about how I can best cope with the situation

0.696

 

19. I think about the mistakes I have made in this matter

-0.717

 

23. I think about how to change the situation

0.602

 

32. I think about a plan of what I can do best

0.565

4

Positive reappraisal

 

 

15. I think that I can become a stronger person as a result of what has happened

0.539

 

24. I think that the situation also has its positive sides

0.831

 

33. I look for the positive sides to the matter

0.721

5

Putting into perspective

 

 

7. I think that it all could have been much worse

0.710

 

16. I think that other people go through much worse experiences

0.769

 

25. I think that it hasn’t been too bad compared to other things

0.658

 

34. I tell myself that there are worse things in life

0.739

6

Self-blame

 

 

1. I feel that I am the one to blame for it

0.747

 

10. I feel that I am the one who is responsible for what has happened

0.776

 

28. I think that basically the cause must lie within myself

0.500

7

Focus on thought/rumination

 

 

3. I often think about how I feel about what I have experienced

0.672

 

12. I am preoccupied with what I think and feel about what I have experienced

0.700

 

21. I want to understand why I feel the way I do about what I have experienced

0.706

 

30. I dwell upon the feelings the situation has evoked in me

0.765

8

Catastrophising

 

 

17. I keep thinking about how terrible it is what I have experienced

0.562

 

26. I often think that what I have experienced is the worst that can happen to a person

0.791

 

35. I continually think how horrible the situation has been

0.758

9

Blaming others

 

 

9. I feel that others are to blame for it

0.819

 

18. I feel that others are responsible for what has happened

0.802

 

36. I feel that basically the cause lies with others

0.751

 

Items deleted after the first analysis

 

 

6. I think I can learn something from the situation

0.352

 

8. I often think that what I have experienced is much worse than what others have experienced

-0.035

 

20. I think that I cannot change anything about it

0.366

 

27. I think about the mistakes others have made in this matter

0.440

 

There were no repeated items in any factor, although item 19 (I think about the mistakes I have made in this matter) changed factor with respect to the existing literature (Garnefski et al., 2002; Reche Camba, 2019) and was incorporated into the Refocus on planning factor (as an adaptive strategy).

Factor analysis of the 32 final items (Figure 3) and the previous nine-factor structure explained 63.5% of the total variability in the data (Table 4). The item numbering in the following tables corresponds to the final version of the 32-item firefighter CERQ for preliminary validation.

Figure 3

CERQ model for firefighters with 32 items

 
 

 

Firstly, we observed that the sample of applicants resorted most frequently to the adaptive strategy of positive focus, allowing the person to focus on pleasant thoughts that diminished the effect of the stressful situation they were experiencing at the time of data collection, compared to the other strategies recorded in the questionnaire. Based on the percentage data variability, it can be inferred that certain cognitive strategies were more commonly utilised within the sample, when the scenarios they face tended to be dynamically changing.

Table 4

Results of final factor analysis of CERQ for firefighters, with the percentatge of variance explained by the nine extracted factors

Factor

Sum of the squared saturation of the extraction

Total

% variance

% accumulated

  1. 1.Positive focusing 

4.998

15.618

15.618

  1. 2.Refocus on planning 

3.152

9.849

25.467

  1. 3.Rumination 

2.905

9.079

34.545

  1. 4.Putting into perspective 

1.850

5.781

40.326

  1. 5.Positive reappraisal 

1.753

5.478

45.804

  1. 6.Other-blame 

1.648

5.149

50.953

  1. 7.Acceptance 

1.484

4.637

55.590

  1. 8.Self-blame 

1.378

4.308

59.898

  1. 9.Catastrophising 

1.166

3.645

63.542

 

The internal consistency of the measurement scale was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. Table 5 shows the Cronbach's α coefficients, which ranged between 0.80 and 0.49. These values indicate the reliability of the scale used; we can see that some factors have satisfactory coefficients, but others have more modest coefficients.

Table 5

Internal consistency of the CERQ firefighter total score and its nine factors, based on Cronbach’s alpha calculation

Factor (F) and suprafactor (SF)

Average (DT) B

Cronbach’s Alpha B

F1. Positive refocusing

21.41 (3,240)

.742

F2. Refocus on Planning

11.18 (3,752)

.808

F3. Rumination

13.45 (3,512)

.747

F4. Putting into perspective

12.69 (3,902)

.757

F5. Positive reappraisal

13.73 (1,682)

.724

F6. Blaming others

13.72 (1,253)

.493

F7. Acceptance

12.12 (2,621)

.708

F8. Self-blame

12.89 (1,808)

.520

F9. Catastrophising

14.59 (0,783)

.568

SF1. Adaptive

55.79 (6,990)

.722

SF2. Disadaptive

66.38 (6,234)

.676

Total

124,17 (9,307)

.674

 

The value obtained by calculating Cronbach's alpha indicates the reliability of the answers given. According to Dominguez-Lara (cited by Frías-Navarro, 2022), at values below 0.60 the reliability of the scale could be considered inadequate because the measurement error is large, but we must take into account the changes in the dimensionality of the model following application of the exclusion criteria, which mean that some factors have fewer items than others.

The reliability of the CERQ was analysed for temporal stability using Pearson's correlation between the test scores (initial administration) and the retest (final administration), in the 125 firefighter applicants who completed both administrations of the questionnaire (Table 6).

Table 6

Test-Retest reliability of CERQ for firefighters

Factor (F) and suprafactor (SF)

Test–retest

P

F1. Positive focusing

.555

.01

F2. Refocus on Planning

.645

.01

F3. Rumination

.638

.01

F4. Putting into perspective

.471

.01

F5. Positive reappraisal

.409

.01

F6. Blaming others

.606

.01

F7. Acceptance

.681

.01

F8. Self-blame

.525

.01

F9. Catastrophising

.577

.01

SF1. Adaptive

.738

.01

SF2. Disadaptive

.688

.01

Total

.769

.01

Note. N = 125.

All factors showed a significant correlation (p < 0.01) between the test and retest scores, but there was a disparity between the Pearson correlation values of the factors at the individual level.

A Pearson's correlation analysis was carried out with the two suprafactors (Adaptive-Disadaptive) at the two moments of CERQ administration (Table 7). High positive correlations were observed between the same suprafactor at the two different moments, but there were no significant differences between the two suprafactors at each of the two moments.

Table 7

Test-retest correlation of the CERQ suprafactors (Adaptive/Less Adaptive) for firefighters

 

Adaptive 1

Less adaptive 1

Adaptive 2

.738**

.031

Less adaptive 2

.138

.688**

Note: **p < 0.01. N = 125.

The test-retest for the two suprafactors turned out to be statistically significant in both scenarios, but with similar levels of correlation, indicating that these factors still measure the same thing after 4 months of training.

4. Discussion

The factor analysis carried out allows us to present a preliminary version of the Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in its adaptation to a specific group such as firefighters. The final version includes 32 items distributed into nine factors that explain 63.5% of the total variability of the data, with moderate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.674) and good test-retest reliability (correlation coefficient = 0.769).

These results are similar to those of the original version of the CERQ (Garnefski et al., 2002) as well as its validation in Spanish (Domínguez-Sánchez et al., 2013), maintaining its factorial structure of nine factors and two suprafactors but deleting four of the 36 items in both original versions. Similarly, item 19 (I reflect on the mistakes I have made in this matter) in our sample presented higher factor loadings in the Refocus on planning factor, which implies a change in adaptive thinking. This could be explained by the fact that within a group of firefighters who are in the training phase, where mistakes can have academic but not operational repercussions, it is essential to have a certain capacity for cognitive flexibility. This ability should allow reflection on the mistakes that have been made to facilitate the consolidation of knowledge and experience for future occasions.

One difference that was found, in relation to the original version and the Spanish version of the CERQ, was the behaviour of the suprafactors. We observed that in the sample of aspiring firefighters there was no significant relationship between adaptive and less adaptive thoughts, which leads us to think that in order to pass the basic training course for firefighters it is necessary to use both strategies. This differs from other samples, such as clinical patients (Reche Camba, 2019), in which there was a clear differentiation between those thoughts that improved their state and those that made it worse. In this vein, in future research it would be desirable to address a change in the labels "Adaptive" and "Disadaptive" in professional groups such as the fire brigade, as they may be misleading.

In line with the above, we should note that if one of the two factors is predominant, a particular type of coping strategy is used (adaptive or maladaptive). However, when we analysed it in depth in our sample, we found that there was a degree of adaptability and flexibility that enabled the firefighters to combine both types of strategy to carry out the work for which they were preparing.

4.1. Limitations and future directions of study

This study has opened the door to the planning of more projects on emotion regulation in the field of security and emergencies, which will be important as such professionals serve the general population, and are more frequently exposed to stress factors than the general population due to the type of work they do. Along these lines, in the process of validating the CERQ, aspects were raised that should be addressed in the future:

  1. a)To determine whether similar findings are observed regarding the reflection on errors committed in both experienced professional firefighters and aspiring candidates, it is important to consider the context in which they operate. Given that the aspiring candidates are primarily exposed to simulated emergency situations within a controlled environment, as opposed to real-life experiences, this poses a limitation to our sample. 

  2. b)Reduced versions of the CERQ should be explored to examine the data and assess whether its measures are modified with the intention of gaining a better understanding of the strategies employed by this group.  

  3. c)A specific CERQ model adapted to emergency and security forces should be developed. 

  4. d)Reformulating the labels: a new definition of the suprafactors (Adaptive and Disadaptive) should be developed for security and emergency forces, to provide a clear and concise concept in relation to the work tasks performed. In this vein, we should consider the possibility that in certain samples, such as ours, the factors that Garnefski et al. (2001) identified as disadaptive function as valid strategies for achieving certain objectives. 

  5. e)The influence of the basic training course as an intervention in the modification of emotion regulation strategies in aspiring firefighters should be examined. 

Although, as we have said, this project opens the door to exploring new possibilities for study, it did have several limitations that should be addressed in future studies. One aspect would be the recruitment of more subjects to make up the sample; in this sense we were limited by the number of applicants who enter training each year, so we could consider creating cohorts of applicants every 5 years, allowing a more global view, but making comparisons in turn between the different promotions and groups in the public security system.

In short, this preliminary study suggests that a new version of CERQ for aspiring firefighters could lead to the development of a suitable, valid and reliable instrument to identify emotion regulation strategies in an emergency corp.

Funding

This study received funding via the strategic subsidy plan of the Department of the Interior of the Generalitat de Catalunya for the period 2019–2021 [https://ja.cat/hicn1].

This work was partially funded by project 2021SGR00709 of the Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR).

References

Abdi, S., Taban, S., & Ghaemian, A. (2012). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: Validity and reliability of Persian translation of CERQ-36 item. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32(2011), 2-7. https://doi.org/gn4cxw

Capdevila Ortís, L., Niñerola i Maymì, J., & Pintanel i Bassets, M. (2004). Motivación y actividad física: el autoinforme de motivos para la práctica del ejercicio físico (AMPEF). Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 13(1), 55-74. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/63070

Domínguez-Sánchez, F. J., Lasa-Aristu, A., Amor, P. J., & Holgado-Tello, F. P. (2013). Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Assessment, 20(2), 253-261. https://doi.org/drchs6

Dominguez Lara, S. A., & Medrano, L. A. (2016a). Propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario de estudiantes universitarios de Lima. Psychologia: Avances de la Disciplina, 10(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/kb49

Dominguez Lara, S. A., & Medrano, L. A. (2016b). Invarianza factorial del Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionarie (CERQ) en universitarios limeños y cordobeses. Universitas Psychologica, 15(1), 89-98. https://doi.org/gnttqs

Evans, T. R. (2019). Emotions in the Fire Service: Decision-Making, Risk, and Coping. En T. R. Evans & D. G. Steptoe-Warren (Eds.), Applying Occupational Psychology to the Fire Service (pp. 13-57). Palgrave MacMillan, Cham. https://doi.org/kb5b

Fernández Cruz, M., Álvarez Rodríguez, J., Ávalos Ruiz, I., Cuevas López, M., de Barros Camargo, C., Díaz Rosas, F., González Castellón, E., González González, D., Hernández Fernández, A., Ibáñez Cubillas, P., & Lizarte Simón, E. J. (2020). Evaluation of the Emotional and Cognitive Regulation of Young People in a Lockdown Situation Due to the Covid-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/gm4rft

Ferrando, P. J., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Hernández-Dorado, A., & Muñiz, J. (2022). Decalogue for the Factor Analysis of Test Items. Psicothema, 34(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/jjq8

Ferreira, F. C. A. (2013). La regulación emocional de síntomas psicopatológicos de los bomberos [The Emotional Regulation of Psychopathological Symptoms of Firefighters] [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Extremadura]. https://tinyurl.com/4cf8m8jp

Frías-Navarro, D. (2022). Apuntes de estimación de la fiabilidad de consistencia interna de los ítems de un instrumento de medida (pp. 1-26). Universidad de Valencia. https://tinyurl.com/ckeshw5z

Fujisato, H., Ito, M., Takebayashi, Y., Hosogoshi, H., Kato, N., Nakajima, S., Miyamae, M., Oe, Y., Usami, S., Kanie, A., Horikoshi, M., & Berking, M. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire. Journal of Affective Disorders, 208, 145-152. https://doi.org/gffj9m

Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(8), 1311–1327. https://doi.org/fdk7wc

Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2002). Manual for the use of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. DATEC.

Garnefski, N., van Rood, Y., de Roos, C., & Kraaij, V. (2017). Relationships Between Traumatic Life Events, Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies, and Somatic Complaints. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 24(2), 144-151. https://doi.org/gbkm3z

Hom, M. A., Stanley, I. H., Rogers, M. L., Tzoneva, M., Bernert, R. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2016). The Association between Sleep Disturbances and Depression among Firefighters: Emotion Dysregulation as an Explanatory Factor. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 12(02), 235-245. https://doi.org/f8h5mf

Huang, Q., Zhang, Q., An, Y., & Xu, W. (2019). The relationship between dispositional mindfulness and PTSD/PTG among firefighters: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 151(122), 109492. https://doi.org/gn4ct4

Jermann, F., Van Der Linden, M., D’Acremont, M., & Zermatten, A. (2006). Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ): Confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric properties of the French translation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 126-131. https://doi.org/dpnscw

Khadem, H., Motevalli Haghi, S. A., Ranjbari, T., & Mohammadi, A. (2017). The Moderating Role of Resilience in the Relationship Between Early Maladaptive Schemas and Anxiety and Depression Symptoms Among Firefighters. Practice in Clinical Psychology, 5(2), 133-140. https://doi.org/kb79

Kim, S.-J., & Yook, S.-P. (2018). The Influence of Posttraumatic Stress on Suicidal Ideation in Firefighters : Cognitive Emotion Regulation as a Moderator. Fire Science and Engineering, 32(2), 92-101. https://doi.org/kb8b

Lee, J.-S. (2019). Perceived social support functions as a resilience in buffering the impact of trauma exposure on PTSD symptoms via intrusive rumination and entrapment in firefighters. PLoS ONE, 14(8), e0220454. https://doi.org/gpdq93

Li, C.-H., & Wu, J.-J. (2020). Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in Taiwanese College Students. Assessment, 27(6), 1300-1309. https://doi.org/gdhskc

Mashhadi, A., Ghadiry, F., & Asghari Kaklar, F. (2018). The role of mindfulness and emotion regulation in prediction of post-traumatic stress Disorder in firefighters. International Conference on Mindfulness (ICM) 2018 Science from Within – Amsterdam, July 10-13, 2018. https://tinyurl.com/2p84zpf5

Navarro-Loli, J. S., Dominguez-Lara, S., & Medrano, L. (2020). Estructura Interna del Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ-18) en una Muestra de Adolescentes Peruanos. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 54(1), 165-178. https://doi.org/kb8c

Paltell, K. C., Bing-Canar, H., Ranney, R. M., Tran, J. K., Berenz, E. C., & Vujanovic, A. A. (2019). Anxiety Sensitivity Moderates the Effect of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms on Emotion Dysregulation among Trauma-Exposed Firefighters. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 41(3), 524-535. https://doi.org/gpccr3

Park, S.-K., Ko, G.-B., & Yook, S.-P. (2022). The Effects of Job stress on Suicidal Thoughts among Firefighters: Alcohol Use and Cognitive Emotion Regulation as a Moderator. Fire Science and Engineering, 36(1), 90-97. https://doi.org/kb8d

Potthoff, S., Garnefski, N., Miklósi, M., Ubbiali, A., Domínguez-Sánchez, F. J., Martins, E. C., Witthöft, M., & Kraaij, V. (2016). Cognitive emotion regulation and psychopathology across cultures: A comparison between six European countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 218-224. https://doi.org/f83nnk

Reche Camba, E. (2019). Evaluación de la regulación emocional cognitiva en fibromialgia mediante el instrumento Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) [Tesis doctoral, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona]. https://tinyurl.com/2p84zpf5

Ros Martinez de la Hidalga, I. (2008). Moodle, la plataforma para la enseñanza y organización escolar Iker. Ikastorratza, e- Revista de Didáctica, 2, 3-12. https://tinyurl.com/9c44wxm8

Smith, B. W., Ortiz, J. A., Steffen, L. E., Tooley, E. M., Wiggins, K. T., Yeater, E. A., Montoya, J. D., & Bernard, M. L. (2011). Mindfulness is associated with fewer PTSD symptoms, depressive symptoms, physical symptoms, and alcohol problems in urban firefighters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(5), 613-617. https://doi.org/bhnb79