https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/issue/feed Convivium 2024-12-19T16:35:11+00:00 José Maria Sánchez de León j.sanchezdeleon@ub.edu Open Journal Systems <div><span style="color: black; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; margin: 0;"><strong>Convivium. Revista de Filosofia</strong><br aria-hidden="true" /></span></div> <div><span style="color: black; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; margin: 0;">Departament de Filosofia</span> <div>Universitat de Barcelona</div> <div>Montalegre, 6</div> <div>08001 Barcelona</div> </div> https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48688 THE LAST ETYMOLOGIES OF CRATYLUS: AN INVITATION TO PHILOSOPHY. 2024-12-19T16:22:53+00:00 Daniel Salgueiro danielsalgueiro@ub.edu <p><span data-contrast="auto">This article deals with the etymological problem in the </span><em><span data-contrast="auto">Cratylus </span></em><span data-contrast="auto">by focus- ing on the latest etymologies of the dialogue (437a-c). If previous philosophical ety- mologies showed the world in perpetual movement and subjected to change, this brief etymological sequel, on the contrary, reveals some doctrinal principles concerning sta- bility and permanence that could be considered platonic. The following pages present an interpretation of this passage in line with the rest of the dialogue that, contrary to the opinion of some recent commentaries, underlines the arbitrary nature of the Platon- ic representation of ancient etymology. According to this, the last decompositions of names try to make the reader aware that he should not be seduced by a mere unfounded discursive strategy that can be used in several and even opposite senses to strengthen the elegance of the discourse. Therefore, the supposed etymological technique presented in the dialogue ends up as a negative definition of philosophy. | Keywords: Cratylus, dialectic, etymology, palinode, Plato.</span><span data-ccp-props="{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6,&quot;335559685&quot;:117,&quot;335559731&quot;:0,&quot;335559737&quot;:114,&quot;335559738&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:254}">&nbsp;</span></p> 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel Salgueiro https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48638 SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON ABSTRACTION AS THE BASIS OF THE DIVI- SION OF SPECULATIVE SCIENCES IN AQUINAS’ COMMENTARY ON BOE- THIUS’ DE TRINITATE: ONTOLOGISM VS EPISTEMOLOGY? 2024-12-17T16:18:50+00:00 Emiliano Javier Cuccia emiliano.cuccia@uai.cl <p>Since the middle of the twentieth century, discussions on the criterion for the division of the speculative sciences according to Thomas Aquinas have centered their attention on the interpretation of the fifth question of his commentary on Boethius’ De Trinitate. There, in the third article, the friar enumerates a threefold way in which the intellect can distinguish, which is related to the tripartition of the speculative sciences presented by Aristotle and assumed by Boethius. Some authors consider this passage as the introduction of an epistemological criterion of division that would oppose the ontological criterion proposed by the Roman philosopher. This would mean that, while for the latter the degrees of immateriality would correspond to the things considered themselves, for Aquinas the degrees of immateriality (particularly those of the physical and mathematical sciences) would be objective and determined by the type of intellectual consideration. In view of this, this paper will review the famous commentary of Aquinas in order to determine whether such interpretations are correct. The thesis we hope to prove is that, beyond the introduction of intellectual operations, the immateriality of scientific objects continues to depend fundamentally on the nature of the thing considered and not on the way of consideration.</p> 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Emiliano Javier Cuccia https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/45905 ON THE ATTEMPT TO INTRODUCE THE CONCEPT OF NEGATIVE MAGNI- TUDES INTO THE TRANSCENDENTAL PHILOSOPHY OF KANT 2024-02-27T15:18:14+00:00 Pablo Genazzano pabloadriangenazzano@gmail.com <p>This paper argues both a historical and a systematic thesis. In the historical sense, it is argued that Kant rehabilitates the concept of negative magnitudes between 1790 and 1792. In the systematic sense, it is argued that this rehabilitation is a transcen- dental rehabilitation. In the introduction, the place of the concept of negative magni- tudes in Kant’s career is presented. In the second section, its pre-critical significance is explained, emphasizing its ontological dimension. In the third, fourth and fifth sections, respectively, the psychological, cosmological, and moral significance of this concept is explained. In these sections, the explanation of these three different meanings follows the order of Kant’s publications between 1790 and 1792. Following this order, the con- cept of negative magnitudes is seen in the Analytic of the Sublime of the <em>Critique of Judgment </em>(1790), in the essay <em>On the Failure of Every Philosophical Essay in Theodicy </em>(1791), and in the essay <em>On Radical Evil in Human Nature </em>(1792). In the conclusion a general remark is made on the concept of the negative in Kant. Here it is argued that the transcendental rehabilitation of negative magnitudes is an exception in the development of his thought. | Keywords: evil, negation, negative magnitudes, sublime, theodicy, reality.</p> 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Pablo Genazzano https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/45987 NIHILISM AS VITALISM AND VALUE IN NIETZSCHE 2024-02-18T09:32:25+00:00 Ignacio Carlos Maestro Cano igmaeca@gmx.ch <p>Nihilism and vitalism have being two of the more frequently studied issues in Nietzsche’s thinking. However, it is not so usual their joint study, as if life and values were joined to reinterpret the concept of nihilism. One consequence from this point of view is the move from the usual comprehension of Nietzschean nihilism, full of purely pessimistic connotations towards human being and life, to a purely positive acceptance of life as the only value. Thus, the reputed nihilism of Nietzsche would be, in fact, no other than a maximalist vitalism.</p> 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Ignacio Carlos Maestro Cano https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/47885 Review of Andrew J. Martin, The Covenant with Moses and the Kingdom of God: Thomas Hobbes and the Theology of the Old Covenant in Early Modern England (Leiden: Brill, 2023) 2024-10-22T07:10:17+00:00 James Griffith jecg99@gmail.com 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 James Griffith https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48659 Voltaire, Contes filosòfics 2024-12-18T15:54:54+00:00 Andreu Grau andreugrauarau@gmail.com <p>-</p> 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Andreu Grau https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/47163 Isaiah Berlin. La contra-Ilustración y la voluntad romántica 2024-06-26T18:11:42+00:00 Oscar-Daniel Lorente Martínez o.d.lorente@gmail.com 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Oscar-Daniel Lorente Martínez https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/47661 Bernat Joan Marí. Nietzsche i el modernisme literari català 2024-09-16T08:17:24+00:00 Oriol Ponsatí-Murlà oriolponsati@gmail.com 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 ORIOL PONSATÍ-MURLÀ https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/47006 Alastair Norcross, Morality by Degrees: Reasons Without Demands 2024-06-03T09:20:17+00:00 Martí Bridgewater Mateu ma.bridgewater@ub.edu 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Martí Bridgewater Mateu https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48661 Margarita Mauri Álvarez, La relación razón-pasión: Aristóteles, R. Descartes y J. Butler 2024-12-18T16:21:00+00:00 Èric Reüll ericreull@gmail.com <p>-</p> 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Èric Reüll https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/47232 Más allá del ser y el no ser 2024-07-05T12:06:27+00:00 Marc Zapata Pedrosa marczapata.treball@gmail.com <p>Se trata de una reseña a un libro de Miguel Candel, en el que el autor explora los caminos de la metafísica tradicional con el objetivo de desmantelar el narcisismo relativista propio, a su juicio, de nuestra época.&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Marc Zapata Pedrosa https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48549 ¿Qué religión? Los personajes de Nuns and soldiers, de Iris Murdoch 2024-12-12T12:53:40+00:00 Margarita Mauri mauri@ub.edu Laia Blasi travesseres@gmail.com Victor Escudero vescudak15@alumnes.ub.edu Jonas C. Etxeberría jcasadet20@alumnes.ub.edu Víctor Geira faedor@gmail.com Àlex Ortega mauri@ub.edu Èric Reull ericreull@gmail.com Guilermo Sáenz gsaenzru7@alumnes.ub.edu <p>.</p> 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Margarita Mauri, Laia Blasi, Victor Escudero, Jonas C. Etxeberría, Víctor Geira, Àlex Ortega, Èric Reull, Guilermo Sáenz https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48662 Bulletin Hobbes XXXV 2024-12-18T16:33:56+00:00 Yves Charles-Zakra yczarka@gmail.com Franck Lessay franck.lessay@orange.fr Roger Castellanos Corbera rogercastellanos@ub.edu Liang Pang liangpang0602@qq.com Wladimir Barreto Lisboa wblisboa@gmail.com James Griffith james@metu.edu.tr Maria Lukac De Stier majalukac@uca.edu.ar Raffaella Santi raffaella.santi@uniurb.it Dietrich Schotte dietrich.schotte@psk.uni-regensburg.de Canpu Chen chencanpu@gmail.com Sebnem Ertan Paşaoğlu sebnem@metu.edu.tr Maria Clara Fernandez Sales mariaclarafernandessales@gmail.com Miroslav Vacura vacuram@vse.cz Didier Mineur didier.mineur@gmail.com Josep Monserrat Molas jmonserrat@ub.edu <p>-</p> 2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Yves Charles-Zakra