https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/issue/feedConvivium2024-12-19T16:35:11+00:00José Maria Sánchez de Leónj.sanchezdeleon@ub.eduOpen Journal Systems<div><span style="color: black; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; margin: 0;"><strong>Convivium. Revista de Filosofia</strong><br aria-hidden="true" /></span></div> <div><span style="color: black; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; margin: 0;">Departament de Filosofia</span> <div>Universitat de Barcelona</div> <div>Montalegre, 6</div> <div>08001 Barcelona</div> </div>https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48688THE LAST ETYMOLOGIES OF CRATYLUS: AN INVITATION TO PHILOSOPHY.2024-12-19T16:22:53+00:00Daniel Salgueirodanielsalgueiro@ub.edu<p><span data-contrast="auto">This article deals with the etymological problem in the </span><em><span data-contrast="auto">Cratylus </span></em><span data-contrast="auto">by focus- ing on the latest etymologies of the dialogue (437a-c). If previous philosophical ety- mologies showed the world in perpetual movement and subjected to change, this brief etymological sequel, on the contrary, reveals some doctrinal principles concerning sta- bility and permanence that could be considered platonic. The following pages present an interpretation of this passage in line with the rest of the dialogue that, contrary to the opinion of some recent commentaries, underlines the arbitrary nature of the Platon- ic representation of ancient etymology. According to this, the last decompositions of names try to make the reader aware that he should not be seduced by a mere unfounded discursive strategy that can be used in several and even opposite senses to strengthen the elegance of the discourse. Therefore, the supposed etymological technique presented in the dialogue ends up as a negative definition of philosophy. | Keywords: Cratylus, dialectic, etymology, palinode, Plato.</span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335551550":6,"335551620":6,"335559685":117,"335559731":0,"335559737":114,"335559738":0,"335559740":254}"> </span></p>2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel Salgueirohttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48638SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON ABSTRACTION AS THE BASIS OF THE DIVI- SION OF SPECULATIVE SCIENCES IN AQUINAS’ COMMENTARY ON BOE- THIUS’ DE TRINITATE: ONTOLOGISM VS EPISTEMOLOGY?2024-12-17T16:18:50+00:00Emiliano Javier Cucciaemiliano.cuccia@uai.cl<p>Since the middle of the twentieth century, discussions on the criterion for the division of the speculative sciences according to Thomas Aquinas have centered their attention on the interpretation of the fifth question of his commentary on Boethius’ De Trinitate. There, in the third article, the friar enumerates a threefold way in which the intellect can distinguish, which is related to the tripartition of the speculative sciences presented by Aristotle and assumed by Boethius. Some authors consider this passage as the introduction of an epistemological criterion of division that would oppose the ontological criterion proposed by the Roman philosopher. This would mean that, while for the latter the degrees of immateriality would correspond to the things considered themselves, for Aquinas the degrees of immateriality (particularly those of the physical and mathematical sciences) would be objective and determined by the type of intellectual consideration. In view of this, this paper will review the famous commentary of Aquinas in order to determine whether such interpretations are correct. The thesis we hope to prove is that, beyond the introduction of intellectual operations, the immateriality of scientific objects continues to depend fundamentally on the nature of the thing considered and not on the way of consideration.</p>2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Emiliano Javier Cucciahttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/45905ON THE ATTEMPT TO INTRODUCE THE CONCEPT OF NEGATIVE MAGNI- TUDES INTO THE TRANSCENDENTAL PHILOSOPHY OF KANT2024-02-27T15:18:14+00:00Pablo Genazzanopabloadriangenazzano@gmail.com<p>This paper argues both a historical and a systematic thesis. In the historical sense, it is argued that Kant rehabilitates the concept of negative magnitudes between 1790 and 1792. In the systematic sense, it is argued that this rehabilitation is a transcen- dental rehabilitation. In the introduction, the place of the concept of negative magni- tudes in Kant’s career is presented. In the second section, its pre-critical significance is explained, emphasizing its ontological dimension. In the third, fourth and fifth sections, respectively, the psychological, cosmological, and moral significance of this concept is explained. In these sections, the explanation of these three different meanings follows the order of Kant’s publications between 1790 and 1792. Following this order, the con- cept of negative magnitudes is seen in the Analytic of the Sublime of the <em>Critique of Judgment </em>(1790), in the essay <em>On the Failure of Every Philosophical Essay in Theodicy </em>(1791), and in the essay <em>On Radical Evil in Human Nature </em>(1792). In the conclusion a general remark is made on the concept of the negative in Kant. Here it is argued that the transcendental rehabilitation of negative magnitudes is an exception in the development of his thought. | Keywords: evil, negation, negative magnitudes, sublime, theodicy, reality.</p>2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Pablo Genazzanohttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/45987NIHILISM AS VITALISM AND VALUE IN NIETZSCHE2024-02-18T09:32:25+00:00Ignacio Carlos Maestro Canoigmaeca@gmx.ch<p>Nihilism and vitalism have being two of the more frequently studied issues in Nietzsche’s thinking. However, it is not so usual their joint study, as if life and values were joined to reinterpret the concept of nihilism. One consequence from this point of view is the move from the usual comprehension of Nietzschean nihilism, full of purely pessimistic connotations towards human being and life, to a purely positive acceptance of life as the only value. Thus, the reputed nihilism of Nietzsche would be, in fact, no other than a maximalist vitalism.</p>2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Ignacio Carlos Maestro Canohttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/47885Review of Andrew J. Martin, The Covenant with Moses and the Kingdom of God: Thomas Hobbes and the Theology of the Old Covenant in Early Modern England (Leiden: Brill, 2023)2024-10-22T07:10:17+00:00James Griffithjecg99@gmail.com2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 James Griffithhttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48659Voltaire, Contes filosòfics2024-12-18T15:54:54+00:00Andreu Grauandreugrauarau@gmail.com<p>-</p>2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Andreu Grauhttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/47163Isaiah Berlin. La contra-Ilustración y la voluntad romántica2024-06-26T18:11:42+00:00Oscar-Daniel Lorente Martínezo.d.lorente@gmail.com2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Oscar-Daniel Lorente Martínezhttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/47661Bernat Joan Marí. Nietzsche i el modernisme literari català2024-09-16T08:17:24+00:00Oriol Ponsatí-Murlàoriolponsati@gmail.com2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 ORIOL PONSATÍ-MURLÀhttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/47006Alastair Norcross, Morality by Degrees: Reasons Without Demands2024-06-03T09:20:17+00:00Martí Bridgewater Mateuma.bridgewater@ub.edu2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Martí Bridgewater Mateuhttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48661Margarita Mauri Álvarez, La relación razón-pasión: Aristóteles, R. Descartes y J. Butler2024-12-18T16:21:00+00:00Èric Reüllericreull@gmail.com<p>-</p>2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Èric Reüllhttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/47232Más allá del ser y el no ser2024-07-05T12:06:27+00:00Marc Zapata Pedrosamarczapata.treball@gmail.com<p>Se trata de una reseña a un libro de Miguel Candel, en el que el autor explora los caminos de la metafísica tradicional con el objetivo de desmantelar el narcisismo relativista propio, a su juicio, de nuestra época. </p> <p> </p>2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Marc Zapata Pedrosahttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48549¿Qué religión? Los personajes de Nuns and soldiers, de Iris Murdoch2024-12-12T12:53:40+00:00Margarita Maurimauri@ub.eduLaia Blasitravesseres@gmail.comVictor Escuderovescudak15@alumnes.ub.eduJonas C. Etxeberríajcasadet20@alumnes.ub.eduVíctor Geirafaedor@gmail.comÀlex Ortegamauri@ub.eduÈric Reullericreull@gmail.comGuilermo Sáenzgsaenzru7@alumnes.ub.edu<p>.</p>2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Margarita Mauri, Laia Blasi, Victor Escudero, Jonas C. Etxeberría, Víctor Geira, Àlex Ortega, Èric Reull, Guilermo Sáenzhttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/convivium/article/view/48662Bulletin Hobbes XXXV2024-12-18T16:33:56+00:00Yves Charles-Zakrayczarka@gmail.comFranck Lessayfranck.lessay@orange.frRoger Castellanos Corberarogercastellanos@ub.eduLiang Pangliangpang0602@qq.comWladimir Barreto Lisboawblisboa@gmail.comJames Griffithjames@metu.edu.trMaria Lukac De Stiermajalukac@uca.edu.arRaffaella Santiraffaella.santi@uniurb.itDietrich Schottedietrich.schotte@psk.uni-regensburg.deCanpu Chenchencanpu@gmail.comSebnem Ertan Paşaoğlusebnem@metu.edu.trMaria Clara Fernandez Salesmariaclarafernandessales@gmail.comMiroslav Vacuravacuram@vse.czDidier Mineurdidier.mineur@gmail.comJosep Monserrat Molasjmonserrat@ub.edu<p>-</p>2024-12-19T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Yves Charles-Zakra