Feminising politics: notes on material and temporal feminist modal logics in action

Authors

  • Felicity Colman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/jnmr.v1i1.29895

Abstract

Feminist activism aims to work to change the inequitable structures of the world. But feminists themselves get bound up in actions and intentions that are tied to their large object of critique (the patriarchy, the planet, the media, the canon, etc), and the micropolitics of the subjects constituting and constituted by those objects can be swept up in humanistic rhetorical gestures and words.  How can we teach the modalities and the genealogy of feminist actions that offer tools for everyday living and for a community practice, and which also offer some ways to engage with the affective matter of the world from a posthumanist perspective, and thereby work to shift cultural attitudes? In addition to the valuable work done by those that tirelessly figure methods of communicating social inequities, the work of research led feminist informed teaching and governance can not only excavate the histories of social, political, speciesist, and biological inequities, but also offer a critique of these positions by the terms of their epistemological construction, and provide different modalities of practice.  This article focuses on the latter, discussing how we might design curriculum and engage a pedagogy of recognition for a feminist modal ethics. How modes of feminist new materialist practice take the questions of affect, and agency, to enable ethical political practices is a pressing concern for many communities concerned with generating a planetary ethics. How new materialist methodology is useful for thinking the vernacular political reality was the topic of an intensive discussion and debate that took place in November 2017 in Barcelona. Taking an example of the concrete work undertaken by Barcelona Councillor Gala Pin in relation to the neighbourhood ofCiutat Vella,the article proposes that we explore and extend the genealogy of a feminist modal logics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alaimo, Stacy (2014a). Thinking as the Stuff of the World. O-Zone: A Journal of Object-Oriented Studies. (no.1) pp.13-21.

Alaimo, Stacy (2014b). Oceanic origins, plastic activism, and new materialism at Sea. Material Ecocriticism, Iovino, S., & Oppermann, S. (Eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp.186-203.

Alaimo, Stacy & Hekman, Susan (2008). Introduction: Emerging Models of Materiality in Feminist Theory. Material Feminisms, S. Alaimo and S. Hekman, (eds.): 1-19, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Arendt, Hannah (1958 [1951]). The Origins of Totalitarianism, Cleveland & New York: Meridian Books.

Arendt, Hannah (2011). Essays in understanding, 1930-1954: formation, exile, and totalitarianism. Schocken.

Barad, Karen (2003). ‘Posthumanist Performativity. Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter’. Signs, 28(3): pp.801–831.

Bargetz, Brigitte (2018). Longing for agency: New materialisms’ wrestling with despair. European Journal of Women’s Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506818802474

Braidotti, Rosi (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge: PolityPress.

Braidotti, Rosi (2008). In Spite of the Times: The Postsecular Turn in Feminism. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(6), pp.1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276408095542

Braidotti, Rosi & Hlavajova, Maria (Eds.). (2018). Posthuman Glossary. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Brown, Wendy (2017). Walled states, waning sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Colman, Felicity (2016). Digital Biopolitics: The Image of Life. Resisting Biopolitics: Philosophical, Political and Performative Strategies. S. Wilmer and A. Žukauskaitė (eds.). London & New York: Routledge, pp.189-201.

Colman, Felicity (2018). Agency. New Materialism Almanac.http://newmaterialism.eu/almanac/a/agency.html

Colman, Felicity (2019; [forthcoming]). Modality. “New Concepts for Materialism” special issue. I. Van der Tuin & A. Nocek (Eds.) Philosophy Today.

Colman, Felicity, Bühlmann, Vera, O’Donnell, Aisliin & van der Tuin, Iris (2018). Ethics of Coding: A Report on the Algorithmic Condition [EoC]. H2020-EU.2.1.1. – INDUSTRIAL LEADERSHIP – Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies – Information and Communication Technologies. Brussels: European Commission. 732407, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/207025_en.html. pp.1–54.

Degen, Monica (2017). Urban Regeneration and “Resistance of Place”: Foregrounding Time and Experience. Space and Culture, 20(2), pp.141–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331217697136

Denning, Steve (2016). Trump And Authoritarian Propaganda. Forbes. (November 15) https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2016/11/06/trump-and-authoritarian-propaganda/#3b6512743e0a

Dixon-Román, Ezequiel (2017). Toward a hauntology on data: On the sociopolitical forces of data assemblages. Research in Education, 98(1), pp.44- 58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523717723387

ECV. (2016). Plan de Desarrollo Económico Ciutat Vella 2016-2021. https://bcnroc.ajuntament.barcelona.cat/jspui/bitstream/11703/108625/1/PDE_CiutatVella-2016_cas.pdf

Fraser, Nancy (2016) Progressive Neoliberalism versus Reactionary Populism: A Choice that Feminists Should Refuse, NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 24:4, pp.281-284, DOI: 10.1080/08038740.2016.1278263

Glaser, Eliane (2018). Anti-politics: on the demonization of ideology, authority and the state. Watkins Media Limited.

Grosz, Elisabeth (1998). Thinking the new: Of futures yet unthought. symploke, 6(1): pp.38-55.

Grosz, Elisabeth (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Grosz, Elisabeth (2005). Time travels: Feminism, nature, power. Durham, NC.: Duke University Press.

Grosz, Elisabeth (2010). The untimeliness of feminist theory. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 18(1), pp.48-51.

Harding, Sandra (1992) Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’? The Centennial Review 36(3): pp.437–470.

Hirschmann, Nancy & McClure, Kristie (Eds.). (2010). Feminist Interpretations of John Locke. Penn State Press.

Illing, Sean (2019). A 1951 book about totalitarianism is flying off the shelves. Here's why. Vox. https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/6/28/15829712/hannah-arendt-donald-trump-brexit-totalitarianism

Iovino, Serenella & Oppermann, Serpil (eds.) (2014). Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

IPCC (2018). Summary for Policymakers. Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, T. Waterfield (eds.)]. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jasanoff, Sheila & Simmet, Hilton (2017). No funeral bells: Public reason in a ‘post-truth’ age. Social Studies of Science, 47(5), pp.751–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717731936

Jiménez-Pacheco, Pedro (2018). After Planning, the Production of Radical Social Space in Barcelona: Real-Estate Financial Circuit and (De Facto) Right to the City. Urban Planning, 3(3), pp.83-104. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i3.1360

Livholts, Mona & Tamboukou, Maria (2015). Theoretical and Methodological Departures in Contested Fields of Study. Discourse and narrative methods: Theoretical departures, analytical strategies and situated writings. Sage. pp.9-26.

Mahon, Rianne & Robinson, Fiona (Eds.). (2011). Feminist ethics and social policy: Towards a new Global Political Economy of Care. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

MacCormack, Patricia (2012). Posthuman ethics: Embodiment and cultural theory. London: Ashgate.

Patel, Tina & Connelly, Laura (2019). ‘Post-race’ racisms in the narratives of ‘Brexit’ voters. The Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119831590

Pin, Gala (2017). Gala Pin and Whitney Stark in Conversation, with Ana González Ramos. 4th New Materialism Training School, “Art & Activism” Curated by Beatriz Revelles-Benavente. Arts Santa Monica, Barcelona, Spain. (November 22). Transcriptions of the conversation by F.Colman.

Poser, Hans (2013). Technology and Modality.Printed Physics. – Metalithikum 1. Bühlmann & Hovestadt (eds.) Vienna: Ambra: pp.71-112.

Smith, Dorothy (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. University of Toronto Press.

Stang, Nicholas (2016). Kant's Modal Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.

Stark, Whitney (2017). Gala Pin and Whitney Stark in Conversation, with Ana González Ramos. 4th New Materialism Training School, “Art & Activism”. Curated by Beatriz Revelles-Benavente. Arts Santa Monica, Barcelona, Spain. (November 22). Transcriptions of the conversation by F.Colman.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-17

Issue

Section

Media Arts & Culturing