TIMOTHY L. FACE (2011): Perception of Castilian Spanish Intonation: Implications for Intonational Phonology, Munich, LINCOM Europa.
Abstract
To be added.
References
BECKMAN, M. E. y J. B. PIERREHUMBERT (2012): «Intonational structure in Japanese and English», Phonology Yearbook, 3, pp. 255-203.
FACE, T. L. (2002): Intonational marking of contrastive focus in Madrid Spanish, Munich, Lincom Europa.
FACE, T. L. (2008): The intonation of Castilian Spanish declaratives and absolute interrogatives, Munich, Lincom Europa.
HENRIKSEN, N. C. (2012): «The intonation and signaling of declarative questions in Manchego Peninsular Spanish», Language and Speech, 55(4).
HUALDE, J. I. (2003): «El modelo métrico y autosegmental», en Pilar Prieto (ed.): Teorías de la entonación, Barcelona, Ariel, pp. 155-184.
LADD, D. R. (2008): Intonational phonology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
PIERREHUMBERT, J. B. (1980): The phonetics and phonology of English intonation, tesid doctoral, MIT, Boston, MA.
PRIETO, P. 1998: «The scaling of the L values in Spanish downstepping contours», Journal of Phonetics, 26, pp. 261-282.
WILLIS, E. (2003): The intonational system of Dominican Spanish: Findings and analysis, tesis doctoral, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published online by Estudios de Fonética Experimental are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED), unless otherwise noted. Estudios de Fonética Experimental is an open access journal. Estudios de Fonética Experimental is hosted by RCUB (Revistes Científiques de la Universitat de Barcelona), powered by Open Journal Systems (OJS) software. The copyright is not transferred to the journal: authors hold the copyright and publishing rights without restrictions. The author is free to use and distribute pre and post-prints versions of his/her article. However, preprint versions are regarded as a work-in-progress version used as internal communication with the authors, and we prefer to share postprint versions.