Texts on Violence: Of the Impure (Contaminations, Equivocations, Trembling)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/oxi.2020.i17.31566Keywords:
deconstruction, law, Jacques Derrida, Giorgio Agamben, Walter Benjamin, critique of violence, justiceAbstract
This article interrogates a certain philosophical scene – one which constitutes itself through the position of what Jacques Derrida calls “the ethical instance of violence.” In the course of the essay, I analyze this quasi-juridical scene through readings of Aristotle, Walter Benjamin, and Giorgio Agamben among others. The scene, built on texts on texts on violence, demands a logic of purity; it is wary of contaminations and equivocations. And yet it thrives on them. In analyzing the implications of text, writing, and trace for the philosophical discourse on violence, I follow Derrida “just to see” what could make the scene tremble.References
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. (1998). Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. (1999). Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. (2005a). State of Exception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. (2005b). The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. (2015). The Use of Bodies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. (2019). Creation and Anarchy: The Work of Art and the Religion of Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
ARISTOTLE. (2011). Nicomachean Ethics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
BENJAMIN, Walter. (1996). Selected Writings. Volume 1. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
BENNINGTON, Geoffrey. (2016). Scatter 1: The Politics of Politics in Foucault, Heidegger, and Derrida. New York: Fordham University Press.
BERNSTEIN, Richard. (2013). Violence: Thinking Without Bannisters. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BOSTEELS, Bruno. (2017). “Critique of Originary Violence: Freud, Heidegger, Derrida.” The Undecidable Unconscious, 4, 27-66.
BUTLER, Judith. (2020). The Force of Nonviolence: An Ethico-Political Bind. London and New york: Verso.
CAMPOS-SALVATERRA, Valeria. (2019). “The Original Polemos: Phenomenology and Violence in Jacques Derrida.” In G. Rae and E. Ingala (eds). The Meanings of Violence: From Critical Theory to Biopolitics. New York: Routledge.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (1978). Writing and Difference. London and New York: Routledge.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (1981). Dissemination. London: The Athlone Press.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (1992a). Acts of Literature. New York and London: Routledge.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (1992b). Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (1993). Aporias. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (1995). The Gift of Death. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (1996). “Remarks on Deconstruction and Pragmatism.” In C. Mouffe (ed). Deconstruction and Pragmatism. London and New York: Routledge.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (1997). Of Grammatology. Corrected Edition. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (2001). A Taste for the Secret. Cambridge: Polity Press.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (2002). Acts of Religion. New York and London: Routledge.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (2005). The Politics of Friendship. London and New York: Verso.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (2006). “Comment ne pas trembler?” Annali: Fondazione europea del disegno (Fondation Adami), 2, 91-104.
GASCHÉ, R. (2016). Deconstruction, Its Force, Its Violence. Albany: SUNY Press.
HÄGGLUND, Martin. (2008). Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
HÄGGLUND, Martin. (2011). “The Radical Evil of Deconstruction: A Reply to John Caputo.” Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, 11 (2), 126-150.
HAMACHER, Werner. (1994). “Afformative, Strike: Benjamin’s ‘Critique of Violence.’” In A. Benjamin and P. Osborne (eds). Walter Benjamin’s Philosophy: Destruction and Experience. London and New York: Routledge.
HAMACHER, Werner. (2002). “Guilt History: Benjamin’s Sketch ‘Capitalism as Religion.’” Diacritics, 32 (3-4), 81-106.
HANSSEN, Beatrice. (2000). Critique of Violence. Between Poststructuralism and Critical Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
JOHNSON, David. (2007). “As If the Time Were Now: Deconstructing Agamben.” The South Atlantic Quaterly, 106 (2), 265-290.
MARTEL, James. (2015). “The Anarchist Life we are Already Living: Benjamin and Agamben on Bare Life and the Resistance to Sovereignty.” In B. Moran and C. Salzani (eds). Towards the Critique of Violence: Walter Benjamin and Giorgio Agamben. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
MORAN, Brendan and SALZANI, Carlo. (2015). “Introduction: On the Actuality of ‘Critique of Violence.’” In B. Moran and C. Salzani (eds). Towards the Critique of Violence: Walter Benjamin and Giorgio Agamben. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
MERCIER, Thomas Clément. (2016). “Resisting Legitimacy: Weber, Derrida, and the Fallibility of Sovereign Power.” Global Discourse, 6 (3), 374-391.
MERCIER, Thomas Clément. (2018). “We Have Tasted the Powers of the Age to Come: Thinking of Force of the Event – from Dynamis to Puissance.” Oxford Literary Review, 40 (1), 76-94.
NAAS, Michael. (2009). “An Atheism that (Dieu merci!) Still Leaves Something to be Desired.” CR: The New Centennial Review, 9 (1), 45-68.
SCHEURMANN, I. and K. (eds). (1992). Für Walter Benjamin. Dokumente, Essays und ein Entwurf. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
VITALE, Francesco. (2018). Biodeconstruction: Jacques Derrida and the Life Sciences. New York: SUNY Press.
ŽIŽEK, S. (2016). Against the Double Blackmail: Refugees, Terror and Other Troubles with the Neighbours. London: Allen Lane.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
b) Texts will be published under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, provided they include an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship, its initial publication in this journal and the terms of the license.