Alexandria, Quasi Roma: la disputa dels patriarques nestori i ciril en el marc del conflicte teològico-polític de les natures de Crist.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/IHE2024.137.5Keywords:
Monofisismo; Diofisismo; Nestori; Cirilo; Concilio de Calcedonia.Abstract
After the legalization of Christianity and the Council of Nicaea, Christianity entered a period of consolidation and doctrinal structuring, with the 5th century marked by theological disputes regarding the nature of Christ. This period was defined by the conflict between Nestorius of Constantinople and Cyril of Alexandria, who embodied opposing christological positions. The tensions between them, which raised fundamental questions such as the number of natures of Christ, triggered a series of councils, such as those of Ephesus and Chalcedon, which sought to establish a common doctrine among orthodox Christianity and end the disputes between the schools of Alexandria and Antioch. However, these councils did not fully resolve the disputes and led to significant divisions within Christianity. In recent historical research, the supposed heresy of Nestorius has begun to be seen as the result of a theological misunderstanding, exacerbated by the political tensions between thePope of Rome and the Eastern sees, particularly Alexandria and Constantinople.
This new interpretation allows for a revaluation of the conflict and its repercussions in shaping the different Christian traditions.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-01-15 (3)
- 2025-01-15 (2)
- 2025-01-08 (1)
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright policy begins to apply in number 135 corresponding to 2022.
The author who publishes in this journal agrees with the following terms:
1. The author retains the rights of authorship and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work.
2. The texts are distributed under the Creative Commons International License for Recognition and Derivative Works 4.0 (CC-BY-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
3. The authors are allowed to have additional independent contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the magazine (for example the publication of an institutional or thematic repertoire, the new page personal website or a book), always that the first publication in the journal is stated.
4. It is possible to archive published versions.