Historical Drawbacks of Limited Liability
Keywords:Commitment, Financial speculation, Corporate social responsibility, Limited liability, Multiple liability
AbstractLimited liability is a human invention which has facilitated enormous economic growth around the world, particularly since the time of its general application in advanced countries during the nineteenth century. The individual legal identity of companies, coupled with the limited liability of their owners, has provided protection for investors from the risks associated with their investments. It has thus contributed to increase the sources of capital available to finance projects which might otherwise have been considered unviable. However, the legal protection offered to investors has negative consequences for other participants in economies. Speculation in stock markets often damages society. It is very important to study the drawbacks of limited liability and to suggest modifications to achieve a more stable, less volatile, economic growth in the world. Although this article goes to some lengths to recognise the work of authors who emphasise the positive historical economic contribution of limited lability, its main objective is to provoke a reflection around texts which point out the drawbacks and propose solutions.
Acheson, Graeme, and John D. Turner. 2006. “The Impact of Limited Liability on Ownership and Control: Irish Banking, 1877-1914.” The Economic History Review, New Series 59(2): 320-346.
Andrades, R. Eduardo. 2011. “La Sociedad Anónima en la Tradición Jurídica Hispano-Indiana.” Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos (Sección Historia del Derecho Hispano-Indiano), XXIII: 401-444.
Bell, Gareth. 2013. “Restoring trust in the corporation: an interview with Colin Mayer, Peter Moores Professor of Management Studies at Said Business School and author of “Firm Commitment.”” Strategic Direction 29(6): 35-39.
Blair, Margaret. 2004. “Reforming Corporate Governance: What History Can Teach Us.” Berkeley Business Law Journal 1: 1-44.
Bowen, H. 1953. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper.
Bryer, R. A. 1997. “The Mercantile Laws Commission of 1854 and the Political Economy of Limited Liability.” The Economic History Review, New Series 50(1): 37-56.
Carroll, A.B. 1979. “A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance.” Academy of Management Review 4: 497-505.
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. 1996 (1990). Escala y Diversificación. La Dinámica del Capitalismo Industrial. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.
Dobos, Ned. 2011. “Non-Libertarianism and Shareholder Theory: A Reply to Schaefer.” Journal of Business Ethics 98: 273-279.
Easterbrook, Frank H., and Daniel R. Fischel. 1985. “Limited Liability and the Corporation.” The University of Chicago Law Review 52: 1.
Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Funding Universe. 2014. Source for the history of companies:
Galbraith, John K. 1991. Breve Historia de la Euforia Financiera. Barcelona: Ariel Editorial.
Gillman, Max, and Tim Eade. 1995. “The Development of the Corporation in England, with Emphasis on Limited Liability.” International Journal of Social Economics 22(4): 20-32.
Grace’s Guide 2014. “Source for the history of UK industry and companies.” http://www.gracesguide.co.uk
Grossman, Richard S. 2001. “Double Liability and Bank Risk Taking.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 33(2): 43-159.
Grossman, Richard S. 2007. “Fear and greed: the evolution of double liability in American banking, 1865-1930.” Explorations in Economic History 44: 59-80.
Hiller, Janine S. 2013. “The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics 118: 287-301.
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1988. Historia Financiera de Europa. España: Crítica.
Krugman, P. Wells, R., and K. Graddy. 2011. Essentials of Economics. New York: Worth Publishers.
Kyriazis, Nicholas and Theodore Metaxas. 2011 “Path Dependence, Change and the Emergence of the First Joint-Stock Companies.” Business History 538(3): 363-374.
Lee, Min-Dong Paul. 2008. “A Review of the Theories of Social Responsibility: Its Evolutionary Path and the Road Ahead.” International Journal of Management Reviews 10(1): 53-73.
Lindgreen, Adam and Swaen, Valérie. 2010. “Corporate Social Responsibility.” International Journal of Management Reviews 12(1): 1-7.
Macey, Jonathan R., and Geoffrey P. Miller. 1992 “Double Liability of Bank Shareholders: History and Implications.” Wake Forest Law Review Rev. 31.
Marens, Richard. 2012. “Generous in Victory? American Managerial Autonomy, Labour Relations and the Invention of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Socio-Economic Review 10: 59-84.
Marquis, Ralph W., and Frank P. Smith. 1937. “Double Liability for Bank Stock.” The American Economic Review 27(3): 490-502.
Mayer, Colin. 2013. Firm Commitment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McBride, David. 2011. “General Corporation Laws: History and Economics.” Law and Contemporary Problems 74: 1-18.
Moss, David. 2004. When All Else Fails: Government as the Ultimate Risk Manager. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Mossa, Lorenzo. 1951. Trattato del nuovo diritto comerciale. IV:5. Italy: Padova.
Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. 2006. “Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility.” Harvard Business Review 84(12): 78-92.
Rose, Jacob. 2007. “Corporate Directors and Social Responsibility. Ethics versus Shareholder Value.” Journal of Business Ethics 73: 319-331.
Schwartz, Andrew. 2012. “The Perpetual Corporation.” George Washington Law Review, 80.
Shiller, Robert J. 2004. “Las Lecciones de los Principales Inventos Financieros.” In El Nuevo Orden Financiero. El Riesgo en el Siglo XXI, edited by Robert J. Shiller, 267-281. España: Ed. Turner.
Shiller, Robert J. 2012. Las finanzas en una Sociedad Justa. Barcelona: Deusto.
Tencati, Antonio, and Laszlo Zsolnai. 2009. “The Collaborative Enterprise.” Journal of Business Ethics 85: 367-376.
Voss, Rainer. 2013. Master of the Universe. Documentary film produced in Germany by Katrin Klöntrup.
Wallich, H.C, and J.J. McGowan. 1970. “Stockholder interest and the corporation’s role in social policy.” In A New Rationale for Corporate Social Policy edited by W. J. Baumol. New York: Committee for Economic Development.
Watts, P., and Holme, R. 1999. Meeting Change Expectations. Corporate Social Responsibility. Geneva: WBCSD.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Authors transfer to Universitat de Barcelona all copyright. Creative Commons
Created from a work avaible in http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB