Arts Council England: Ramifications of Organisational Dynamics and Institutional Setting on Policy
Keywords:Arts Policy, Resources, Political, Cultural processes.
This paper offers a view of the development of decision making and policy within the Arts Council, national development agency for the arts, and explores the notion of how strategies are often the outcome of resource, political and cultural processes rather than discrete strategic planning. For the purposes of this paper, decision making and policy making are being treated as synonymous as key expressions of strategy. The paper is based on an examination of the assumption with which the Arts Council historically has justified both its general operations and particular decisions, the aim being to identify the various ideological and structural determinants which bear upon its decision-making processes. The paper concludes that the Arts Council is influenced by normative pressures from without and within which leads the organisation to be guided by previously legitimated policies which over time have become standard operating practice. The legitimated policies have had the tendency to lead to isomorphism within the Arts Council environment, creating selected patterns of routine and continuity. A form of ‘constructive tension’ has arisen between that which is deemed necessary to preserve and that which must change with time.
Aldrich, Howard E. 1999. Organisations Evolving. London: Sage.
Bachrach, Peter, and Morton S. Baratz. 1970. Power and Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bower, Joseph L. 1972. Managing the Resource Allocation Process: a study of Corporate Planning and Investment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Braybrooke, David, and Charles E. Lindblom. 1963. A Strategy of Decision. London: Collier Macmillan.
Bunting, Catherine. 2008. “What instrumentalism? A public perception of value.” Cultural Trends 17 (4): 323-328.
Burgelman, Robert A. 1983. “A model of the interaction of strategic behaviour, corporate context and the concept of strategy.” Academy of Management Review 81 (1): 61-70.
Cummings, Milton C. and Richard S. Katz, eds. 1987. The Patron State: Government and the Arts in Europe, North America and Japan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodman, Arnold. 1984. “The Case Against Arts Cuts.” Observer, March 25th, 1984.
Holden, John. 2005. Capturing Cultural Value. London: Demos.
Johnson, Gerry. 1988. “Re-thinking incrementalism.” Strategic Management Journal 9:75-91.
Johnson, Gerry, Kevan Scholes, and Richard Whittington. 2005. Exploring Corporate Strategy. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1983. The Change Masters: Innovation for Productivity in the American Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The science of muddling through.” Public Administration Review 19:79-88.
Minihan, Janet. 1971. The Nationalisation of Culture. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Mintzberg, Henry. 1994. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
Mintzberg, Henry, and James A. Waters. 1985. “Of strategies, deliberate and emergent.” Strategic Management Journal 6 (3): 257-272.
Noda, Tomo, and Joseph L. Bower. 1996. “Strategy as iterated processes of resource allocation.” Strategic Management Journal 17:159-192.
Parsons, Talcott, and Edward A. Shils. 1962. Towards a General Theory of Action. New York: Harper and Row.
Powell, Walter W., and Paul J. DiMaggio. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Quinn, James B. 1980. Strategies for Change:Logical Incrementalism. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Wilson.
Shaw, Roy. 1980. “Problems of Evaluation.” London: Arts Council of Great Britain, 183.
Simon, Herbert A. 1962. “New Developments in the Theory of the Firm.” The American Economic Review 52 (2): 1-15.
Tattersall, John R. 1988. “A Strategy for the Arts: Five Nation Study of Arts Supports Systems.” PhD diss., City University. <http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/7401/> .
Weeks, John R., and Charles Galunic. 2003. “A theory of the cultural evolution of the firm: the intra-organisational ecology of memes.” Organisational Studies 24 (8): 1309-1352.Zucker, Lynne G. 1987. “Institutional Theories of Organisation.” The Annual Review of Sociology 13:443-464.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Authors transfer to Universitat de Barcelona all copyright. Creative Commons
Created from a work avaible in http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB