The prosody of Spanish yes-no questions: analysis of the variety in Madrid
Keywords:
prosody, yes-no questions, Madrilean SpanishAbstract
This paper analyses the prosodic features that characterize yes-no questions in the variety of Spanish spoken in Madrid. In order to accomplish this objective we will analyze a part of the Devís Herraiz corpus (2008)[1]. The objective of this study is to compare such data with previous descriptions of Madrilenian Spanish in order to improve the description of the prosodic features of this type of questions. Our theorical and methodological framework is the Autosegmental Metric Theory (AM). This study provides both a phonetic and a phonological analysis of the sentences of the corpus. The phonological analysis allows for comparison with the results of previous researches about Madrilenian Spanish.
[1] Corpus developed for the performance of the Ph.D. thesis entitled «The prosodic interfe-rence between L1 and L2: two varieties of Italian and Spanish in comparison».
References
ALCÁNTARA, M.; A. MORENO SANDOVAL; G.DE LA MADRID.; A. GONZÁLEZ e F. ARES (2003): «C-Oral-Rom. Corpus integrado de referencia en lenguas romances», Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 31, pp. 299-301.
ARVANITI, A. e M. BALTAZANI (2000): «Greek ToBI: a system for the annotation of Greek speech corpora», Proceedings of the 2nd International Confe-rence on Language Resources and Evaluation, Paris, European Language Resources Association, pp. 555-562.
AVESANI C., (1995): «ToBIt: un sistema di trascrizione per l’intonazione italiana», Atti delle 5e Giornate di studio del Gruppo di Fonetica Speri-mentale (AIA), Povo (TN), Italia, pp. 85-98.
BECKMAN, M. E. e J. HIRSCHBERG (1994): ToBI annotation conventions, The Ohio State University Research Foundation.
http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~tobi. [03/09/2010].
BECKMAN, M. E. e J. PIERREHUMBERT (1986): «Intonational structure in Japanese and English», Phonology Yearbook, 3, pp. 15-70.
BECKMAN, M. E.; M. DÍAZ-CAMPOS; J. TEVIS MCGORY e T. A. MORGAN (2002): «Intonation across Spanish, in the Tones and Break Indices framework», Probus, 14, pp. 9-36.
DEVÍ HERRAIZ, E. (2008): La prosodia nell'interferenza tra L1 e L2: due varietà di italiano e spagnolo a confronto, tesi di dottorato di richerca, Università degli studi di Pisa.
http://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-04222008-180251 [03/09/2010].
ELORDIETA, G. (1999): «Primer estudio comparativo de la entonación de tres variedades dialectales vascas», Actas del I Congreso de Fonética Experimental, Tarragona, URV e UB, pp. 209-215.
ESTEBAS, E. e P. PRIETO (2008): «La notación prosódica en español. Una revisión del Sp_ToBI», Estudios de fonética experimental, XVII, pp. 263-283.
FACE, T. (2001): «Focus and early peak alignment in Spanish intonation», Probus, 13, pp. 223-246.
FACE, T. (2002): Intonational marking of contrastive focus in Madrid Spanish, Munich, Lincom Europa.
FACE, T. e P. PRIETO (2007): «Rising accents in Castilian Spanish: a revision of Sp-ToBI», Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 6 (1), pp. 117-146.
FERNÁNDEZ PLANAS, A. M. e E. MARTÍNEZ CELDRÁN (2003): «El tono fundamen-tal y la duración: dos aspectos de la taxonomía prosódica en dos modalida-des de habla (enunciativa e interrogativa) del español», Estudios de fonética experimental, XII, pp. 165-200.
GODJEVAC, S. (2000): «An autosegmental/metrical analysis of Serbo-Croatian intonation», Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics, 54, pp. 79-142.
GRICE, M.; M. REYELT; R. BENZMULLER; J. MAYER e A. BATLINER (1996): «Consistency in Transcription and Labelling of German Intonation with GtoBI», Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia, pp. 1716-1719.
GRICE, M.; M. SAVINO; M. D’IMPERIO; C. AVESANI; B. GILI-FIVELA; G. MAROTTA; P. SORIANELLO e P. R. CAPUTO (1999): «Use of an autosegmental-metrical ToBI-like system for annotatine varieties of Italian», comunicazione presentata nel ICPhS 99 workshop, Intonation: models and ToBI labeling, San Francisco.
HUALDE, J. I. (2002): «Intonation in Spanish and the other Ibero-Romance languages: Overview and status quaestionis», in C. Wiltshire e J. Camps (eds.): Romance Phonology and Variation. Selected Papers From the 30th Linguistic Symposium on Romance languages, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 101-116.
HUALDE, J. I. (2003): «El modelo métrico-autosegmental», in P. Prieto (ed.): Teorías de la entonación, Barcelona, Ariel, pp. 155-184.
JUN, S. (2000): K-ToBI (Korean ToBI) labelling conventions.
http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/jun/ktobi/K-tobi.html [03/09/2010].
MAROTTA, G. (2000): «Allineamento e trascrizione dei toni accentuali complessi: una proposta», in D. Locchi, A. Giannini e M. Pettorino (a cura di): Atti delle X Giornate di Studio del GFS, Napoli, pp.139-149.
MAROTTA, G. e P. SORIANELLO (2001): «La teoria autosegmentale nell'analisi dell'intonazione interrogativa in due varietà di italiano toscano (Lucca e Siena)», in Albano Leoni, F. et al. (eds.): Dati empirici e teorie linguis-tiche, Atti del XXXIII Congresso della Società di Linguistica Italiana, Roma, Bulzoni, pp. 177-204.
MAROTTA, G. e E. SARDELLI (2003): «Sulla prosodia della domanda con soggetto postverbale in due varietà di italiano toscano» in Cosi, P. E. Magno Caldognetto e A. Zamboni (eds.): Studi di fonetica in ricordo di F. Ferrero, Unipress, Padova, pp. 205-212
MAROTTA, G.; PH. BOULA DE MAREUIL e M. A. DECKER (2004): «Contribution of Prosody to the Perception of Spanish/Italian Accents», Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Speech Prosody, vol. 1, Nara (Japan), SProSIG, pp. 681-684.
MAROTTA, G. (2005): «L'illusione prosodica», Atti del Covegno di Studi in memoria di Tristano Bolelli, Studi e Saggi Linguistici, XL-XLI, Pisa, pp. 237-258.
MORENO SANDOVAL, A. e M. ALCANTARA (2004): «Aspectos prácticos, tecno-lógicos y legales de la construcción de Corpus de habla espontáneas: la experiencia del proyecto C-Oral-Rom», Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
http//www.uned.es/sel/castellano/34Simp/Resumenes/Moreno-Sandoval.pdf
PÉREZ-BRONCANO, O.; E. ESTEBAS-VILAPLANA; M. M. VANRELL e P. PRIETO: (in stampa): «La expresión del grado de confianza en las preguntas: análisis de un corpus de Map Tasks», Quaderns de Filologia, numero speciale su «La Entonación hispánica».
PIERREHUMBERT, J. (1980): The phonology and phonetics of English intonation, tesi dottorale, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
PRIETO, P.; L. AGUILAR; I. MASCARÓ; F. TORRES-TAMARIT e M. M. VANRELL (2009): «L’etiquetatge prosòdic Cat_ToBI», Estudios de fonética experi-mental, XVIII, pp. 287-309.
QUILIS, A. (1993): Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas, Madrid, Gredos.
QUILIS, A. (1997): Principios de fonología y fonética españolas, Madrid, Arco Libros.
RAMÍREZ VERDUGO, M.D. (2005): «Aproximación a la prosodia del habla de Madrid», Estudios de fonética experimental, XIV, pp. 309-326.
SILVERMAN, K.; M. BECKMAN; J. PITRELLI; M. OSTENDORF; C. WIGHTMAN; P. PRICE; J. PIERREHUMBERT e J. HIRSCHBERG (1992): «ToBi: a standard for labeling English prosody», Proceedings of the Second International Confe-rence on Spoken Language Processing, Banf, Canada, vol. 2, pp. 867-870.
SOSA, J. M. (1999): La entonación del español. Su estructura fónica, variabilidad y dialectología, Madrid, Cátedra.
SOSA, J. M. (2003): «La notación tonal del español en el modelo Sp_ToBI», in P. Prieto (ed.): Teorías de la entonación, Barcelona, Ariel, pp. 155-184.
TOLEDO, G. A. (2003): «Modelo autosegmental y entonación: los corpus DIES-RTVP», Estudios de fonética experimental, XII, pp. 143-163.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published online by Estudios de Fonética Experimental are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED), unless otherwise noted. Estudios de Fonética Experimental is an open access journal. Estudios de Fonética Experimental is hosted by RCUB (Revistes Científiques de la Universitat de Barcelona), powered by Open Journal Systems (OJS) software. The copyright is not transferred to the journal: authors hold the copyright and publishing rights without restrictions. The author is free to use and distribute pre and post-prints versions of his/her article. However, preprint versions are regarded as a work-in-progress version used as internal communication with the authors, and we prefer to share postprint versions.