Participatory Action Research

An experience with youth with intellectual disabilities and their families

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/its.i2.35684

Keywords:

participatory research, people with intellectual disabilites, autonomy, overprotection and family

Abstract

This study describes the intervention through a participatory action research process with a group of young people with intellectual disabilities and their families in the context of an occupational training program at the University of Jaén. The main objective of the research is to explore issues related to the overprotection-autonomy continuum from the perspective of the participants. Through the use of group and / or artistic activities, discussion was promoted to reach to a definition of the terminology and its implications in daily life. The research process assumed that parents and children worked separately but simultaneously, with the aim of creating opportunities to improve mutual understanding through continuous reflection. The main thematic axes identified by the participants with intellectual disabilities were: freedom, parent ́s trust, autonomy, free choice of clothes and independence. In turn, the families identified as dimensions to work: preparation to face new circumstances, overprotection, sexuality, consumption and difficulties in achieving life goals. The participants were able to express their opinions freely, safely and in a diverse way. The participatory process allowed a constructive dialogue about topics considered taboo, such as sexuality and independent living.

Author Biographies

Linda Vanina Ducca Cisneros, Universidad de Comillas

Investigadora Pre Doctoral en Formación (Programa FPU Ministerio de Educación)

Departamento de Trabajo Social y Servicios Sociales 

Facultad de Trabajo Social

UCM

 

David González Casas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Investigador pos doctoral

Departamento de Trabajo Social y Servicios Sociales

Facultad de Trabajo Social

UCM

Javier Cortés Moreno, Universidad de Jaén

PDI/ Director del Programa UniverDi
Departamento de Psicología
Área de Trabajo Social y Servicios Sociales

Universidad de Jaén

References

Abbott, S., & McConkey, R. (2006). The barriers to social inclusion as perceived by people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of intellectual disabilities, 10(3), 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629506067618

Adams, R. (2008). Empowerment, participation and social work. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Aguilar, M. (2013). Trabajo Social: Concepto y metodología. Paraninfo.

Alberich Nistal, T. (2008). IAP, mapas y redes sociales: Desde la investigación a la intervención social. Revista de Trabajo Social Portularia, 8(1), 131-151. Accesible en: https://www.redcimas.org/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2012/08/m_TAlberich_IAPMapas.pdf

Almeida, M. E. (2009). Exclusión y discapacidad: entre la redistribución y el reconocimiento. Noveduc.

Bigby, C., Frawley, P. & Ramcharan, P. (2014). Conceptualizing inclusive research with people

with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12083

Boal, A. (2002). Games for actors and non-actors.Routledge. Borda, F. (1993). La investigación participativa y la intervención social. Documentación social (92), 9-22.

Borda, F. (1999). Orígenes universales y retos actuales de la IAP. Análisis Político, (38), 73-90. Accesible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/anpol/article/view/79283

Bradbury-Jones, C., Isham, L., & Taylor, J. (2018). The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review. Soc Sci Med, 215, 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.038

Calsamiglia, A., y Cubells Serra, J. (2016). El potencial del teatro foro como herramienta de investigación. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento e Investigación Social, 16(1), 189-209. Accesible en: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/537/53744426009.pdf

Coad, J. (2007). Using art-based techniques in engaging children and young people in health care consultations and/or research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 12(5), 487-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987107081250

Cocks, E., & Cockram, J. (1995). The participatory research paradigm and intellectual disability.

Mental Handicap Research, 8(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.1995.tb00140.x

Colmenares, A. (2011). Investigación-acción participativa: una metodología integradora del conocimiento y la acción. Voces y Silencios: Revista Latinoamericana de Educación, 3(1), 102-115. Accesible en: https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/pdf/10.18175/vys3.1.2012.07

Cohen, C. S. (2015). Leveraging the power of shared governance. Walden University

Corrigan, P. W. (2014). The stigma of disease and disability: Understanding causes and overcoming injustices. American Psychological Association.

Davis, L. J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. Verso.

De la Rosa, L. (2017). ¿Investigamos juntos? Personas con discapacidad, historias de vida y emancipación. Revista de Educación Inclusiva, 3(3). Accesible en: https://revistaeducacioninclusiva.es/index.php/REI/article/view/169

De Lorenzo, R. (2007). Discapacidad, sistemas de protección y Trabajo Social. Alianza.

Erel, U., Reynolds, T., & Kaptani, E. (2017). Participatory theatre for transformative social research. Qualitative Research, 17(3), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117696029

Finley, S. (2008). Arts-based research. Handbook of the arts in qualitative research, 71-81.

Foster-Fishman, P., Law, K., Lichty, L., & Aoun, C. (2010). Youth ReACT for social change: A method for youth participatory action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1-2), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9316-y

Foucault, M. (2012). El poder, una bestia magnífica. Sobre el poder la prisión y la vida. Siglo XXI.

Fundación Prevent (2014). Lo incorrecto. Una nueva mirada hacia la discapacidad (Video). Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBLiBLb23ZA

Gallagher, E. (2002). Fundamentals of theory and practice revisited: Adult clients with mild ‘intellectual disability’: Rethinking our assumptions. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 23(4), 202-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1467-8438.2002.tb00518.x

Hamel, S. (2015). Translation between academic research, community and practice: A forum theatre process. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 16(3), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v16i3.226

International Association for Social Work with Groups. (2015). Standards for Social Work Practice with Groups. https://www.iaswg.org/assets/2015_IASWG_STANDARDS_FOR_SOCIAL_WORK_PRACTICE_WITH_GROUPS.pdf

International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of social work. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/

Johnson, K., & Walmsley, J. (2003). Inclusive research with people with learning disabilities: Past, present and futures. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Jurkowski, J. (2008). Photovoice as participatory action research tool for engaging people with intellectual disabilities in research and program development. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2008)46[1:papart]2.0.co;2

Kapitan, L., Litell, M., y Torres, A. (2011). Creative art therapy in a community’s participatory research and social transformation. Art Therapy, 28(2), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2011.578238

Kelly, B., & Doherty, L. (2017). A historical overview of art and music-based activities in social work with groups: Nondeliberative practice and engaging young people’s strengths. Social Work with Groups, 40(3), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01609513.2015.1091700

Knowles, J. G., & Cole, A. L. (2008). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues. Sage.

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.

Lopez, E., Eng, E., Robinson, N., y Wang, C. (2005). Photovoice as a community-based participatory research method. In: Methods in community-based participatory research for health. Jossey-Bass, 326-348.

Madaus, J. (2011). The history of disability services in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 154(1), 5-15.

Mannay, D. (2017). Métodos visuales, narrativos y creativos en investigación cualitativa. Narcea Ediciones.

McConnell, D., Llewellyn, G., & Bye, R. (1997). Providing services for parents with intellectual disability: Parent needs and service constraints. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 22(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668259700033251

Meschini, P. (2018). Sistematización de la intervención en trabajo social. Experiencias y fundamentos para un debate por el pensar-hacer en Ciencias Sociales. Espacio Editorial.

Osei-Kofi, N. (2013). The emancipatory potential of arts-based research for social justice. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(1), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2013.750202

Roth, E. A., Sarawgi, S. N., & Fodstad, J. C. (2019). History of Intellectual Disabilities. In J. L.

Matson, (Ed.). (2019). Handbook of Intellectual Disabilities (pp 3-16). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20843-1

Seale, J., Nind, M., Tilley, L., & Chapman, R. (2015). Negotiating a third space for participatory research with people with learning disabilities: An examination of boundaries and spatial practices. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(4), 483-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1081558

Sinding, C., Warren, R., & Paton, C. (2014). Social work and the arts: Images at the intersection. Qualitative Social Work, 13(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325012464384

Swartz, S., & Nyamnjoh, A. (2018). Research as freedom: Using a continuum of interactive, participatory and emancipatory methods for addressing youth marginality. HTS Theological Studies, 74(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i3.5063

Truman, C., Mertens, D., & Humphries, B. (2000). Research and inequality. University College London.

Villasante, T. (1993). Experiencias y propuestas sobre participación ciudadana. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid.

Wagner, V., Franca García, L., Rodrigues Lucena, T., y Pestillo de Oliveira, L. (2020). Sintagma identidad de metamorfose emancipação na trajetória da pessoa com deficiência. Revista Bioética, 28(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422020281363

Wiles, R., Crow, G., & Pain, H. (2011). Innovation in qualitative research methods: A narrative review. Qualitative Research, 11(5), 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413227

Wong, N., Zimmerman, M., & Parker, E. (2010). A typology of youth participation and empowerment for child and adolescent health promotion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1-2), 100-114.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9330-0

Zuñíga, C., Jarquín, M., Martínez-Andrades, E., y Rivas, J. (2016). Investigación acción participativa: Un enfoque de generación del conocimiento. Revista Iberoamericana de Bioeconomía y Cambio Climático, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5377/ribcc.v2i1.5696

Published

2022-01-20

How to Cite

Ducca Cisneros, L. V., González Casas, D., & Cortés Moreno, J. (2022). Participatory Action Research: An experience with youth with intellectual disabilities and their families. Itinerarios De Trabajo Social, (2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1344/its.i2.35684

Issue

Section

Articles