Fent infertilitat: un abordatge realista agencial de les experiències de dones amb desenvolupament “atípic” del sistema reproductiu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/jnmr.v8.43453Resum
L'enfocament actual de la literatura feminista sobre el funcionament de les noves tecnologies reproductives ha eclipsat una conclusió que també s’origina en abordar qüestions relacionades amb les capacitats reproductives corporals des de les ontologies relacionals com els nous materialismes feministes: igual que la fertilitat, la infertilitat no és una propietat independent, estrictament biològica, inscrita, a priori, als cossos humans, sinó que un fenomen performatiu que es produeix a través de pràctiques materials-discursives específiques. Aquest article pretén aprofundir aquest argument. Per fer-ho, fa una lectura d’experiències encarnades d’infertilitat a través del realisme agencial de Karen Barad (2007) i la seva teoria de la performativitat posthumanista. El text s’estructura al voltant de fragments d’entrevistes amb dones diagnosticades infèrtils per la síndrome de Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser i planteja demostrar com el canvi ètic-ontoepistemològic de “coses” a fenòmens materials-discursius obre possibilitats crucials per al desenvolupament de noves comprensions de la infertilitat. Aquestes són capaces de superar les limitacions dels enfocaments biomèdics i sociològics tradicionals.
Descàrregues
Referències
Adamson, G. David (2009). Global cultural and socioeconomic factors that influence access to assisted reproductive technologies. Women's Health, 5(4), 351–358.
Adrian, Stine W. (2015). Psychological IVF: Conceptualizing emotional choreography in a fertility clinic. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 16(3), 302–317.
Alfano, Bianca (2014). Reprodução assistida: a organização da atenção às infertilidades e o acesso às técnicas reprodutivas em dois serviços público-universitários no Estado do Rio de Janeiro [Assisted reproduction: the organization of care for infertilities and access to reproductive techniques in two public-university services in the state of Rio de Janeiro] [Doctoral dissertation, Rio de Janeiro State University]. Digital Library of Thesis and Dissertations of the Rio de Janeiro State University.
Anders, Abram (2013). Foucault and 'the Right to Life': From Technologies of Normalization to Societies of Control. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(3).
Barad, Karen (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Cultural and Society, 28(3), 801-831.
Barad, Karen (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.
Barnes, Colin (2012). Understanding the Social Model: Past, Present and Future. In Nick Watson, Alan Roulstone, & Carol Thomas (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies (pp. 12-29). Routledge.
Braidotti, Rosi (2006). Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Polity Press.
Brasil (2010). Cadernos de Atenção Básica: Saúde Sexual e saúde reprodutiva [Basic Health Care Resource Books: Sexual and Reproductive Health]. Ministry of Health.
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2015). Renda Domiciliar per capita 2014 [Household income per capita 2014]. https://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Trabalho_e_Rendimento/Pesquisa_Nacional_por_Amostra_de_Domicilios_continua/Renda_domiciliar_per_capita/Renda_domiciliar_per_capita_2014.pdf
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2022). Desigualdades Sociais por Cor ou Raça no Brasil [Social Inequalities by Colour or Race in Brazil]. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/populacao/25844-desigualdades-sociais-por-cor-ou-raca.html
Brown, Wendy (2019). In the Ruins of Neoliberalism: The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the West. Columbia University Press.
Butler, Judith (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Butler, Judith (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. Routledge.
Carranza Ko, Ñusta P. (2020). Making the Case for Genocide, the Forced Sterilization of Indigenous Peoples of Peru. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, 14(2), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.14.2.1740
Center for Economic and Social Rights, Institute of Socioeconomic Studies, & Oxfam Brazil (2017). Factsheet Brazil: Human Rights in Times of Austerity. https://www.inesc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Fact-Sheet-2-English-V_digital_4.pdf
Corrêa, Marilena, & Loyola, Maria A. (2015). Tecnologias de reprodução assistida no Brasil: opções para ampliar o acesso [Assisted reproductive technologies in Brazil: options to improve access]. Physis: Revista de Saúde Coletiva, 25(3), 753-777.
Dews, Peter (1996). Adorno, pós-estruturalismo e a crítica da identidade [Adorno, poststructuralism and the critique of identity]. In Slavoj Žižek (Ed.), Um Mapa da Ideologia [Mapping Ideology] (pp. 51-71). Contraponto.
Feely, Michael (2016). Disability studies after the ontological turn: a return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism. Disability & Society, 31(7), 863-883.
Felitti, Karina Alejandra (2008). Natalidad, soberanía y desarrollo: las medidas restrictivas a la planificación familiar en el tercer gobierno peronista (Argentina, 1973-1976) [Birth rate, sovereignty and development: the restrictive measures on family planning in the third Peronist government]. Revista Estudos Feministas, 16(2), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2008000200011
Finkelstein, Vic. (1980). Attitudes and Disabled People. World Rehabilitation Fund.
Fontes, Fernando, & Martins, Bruno Sena. (2016). Introdução: A normalidade em crise [Introduction: Normality in crisis]. In Fernando Fontes & Bruno Sena Martins (Eds.), Deficiência e emancipação social: para uma crise da normalidade [Disability and social emancipation: towards a crisis of normality] (pp. 7-13). Almedina.
Foucault, Michel (1978). The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1. An Introduction. Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège De France 1978-79. Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, Michel (1980). The Confession of the Flesh. In Colin Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972-1977 (pp. 194-228). Pantheon Books.
Friedler, Shevach, Grin, Leonti, Liberti, Gad, Saar-Ryss, Buzhena, Rabinson, Yaakov, & Meltzer, Semion (2015). The reproductive potential of patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome using gestational surrogacy: a systematic review. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 32(1), 54-61.
Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie (2011). Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 26(3), 591-609.
Geerts, Evelien, Hoegaerts, Josephine, Hens, Kristien, & Blackie, Daniel (2022). Dis/abling gender in crisis times. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 25(1), 1-18.
Grigoryev, Leonid M., & Starodubtseva, Marina F. (2021). Brazil in the 21st century: A difficult path. Russian Journal of Economics, 7, 250−268. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.7.78432
Guntram, Lisa (2018). Hooked on a feeling? Exploring desires and ‘solutions’ in infertility accounts given by women with ‘atypical’ sex development. The Sociological Review, 22(3), 27-46.
Haraway, Donna (2018). Modest-Witness@Second-Millennium.FemaleMan-Meets-OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience. Routledge.
Harris, Katie, Fitzgerald, Oisín, Paul, Repon C., Macaldowie, Alan., Lee, Evelyn, & Chambers, Georgina M. (2016). Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2014. National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, University of New South Wales.
Harvey, David (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Heller-Boersma, Jacoline G., Edmonds, D. K., & Schmidt, Ulrike H. (2009). A Cognitive Behavioural Model and Therapy for Utero-Vaginal Agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome: MRKH). Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37(4), 449-467.
Helosvuori, Elina (2021). Procreative Entanglements: embryos, clinical practices and experiences of childlessness in the age of assisted reproduction [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki]. HELDA - Digital Repository of the University of Helsinki.
Herlin, Morten Krogh, Petersen, Michael Bjørn, & Brännström, Mats (2020). Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: a comprehensive update. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 15(1), 1-16.
Herrmann, Janne Rothmar, & Kroløkke, Charlotte (2018). Eggs on Ice: Imaginaries of Eggs and Cryopreservation in Denmark. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2018.1424727
Institute for Applied Economic Research (n.d.). Salário Mínimo Vigente [Current Minimum Wage]. http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/ExibeSerie.aspx?serid=1739471028
Jones, Benjamin P., Ranaei-Zamani, Niccole, Vali, Saaliha, Williams, Nicola, Saso, Srdjan, Thum, Meen-Yau, Al-Memar, Maya, Dixon, Nuala, Rose, Gillian, Testa, Giuliano, Johannesson, Liza, Yazbek, Joseph, Wilkinson, Stephen, & Smith, J. Richard (2021). Options for acquiring motherhood in absolute uterine factor infertility; adoption, surrogacy and uterine transplantation. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 23(2), 138-147.
Kirby, Vicki (2017). Foreword. In Vicki Kirby (Ed.), What if Culture was Nature all Along? (pp. viii-xii). Edinburgh University Press.
Kleinman, Adam (2012). Intra-actions – Interview with Karen Barad. Mousse, 34, 76–81.
Lafuente-Funes, Sara (2020). Shall we stop talking about egg donation? Transference of reproductive capacity in the Spanish Bioeconomy. BioSocieties, 15, 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-019-00149-5
Lam, Carla (2015). New reproductive technologies and disembodiment. Ashgate.
Meskus, Mianna (2015). Agential multiplicity in the assisted beginnings of life. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 22(1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506814530691
Meskus, Mianna (2021). Speculative Feminism and the Shifting Frontiers of Bioscience: Envisioning Reproductive Futures with Synthetic Gametes through the Ethnographic Method. Feminist Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001211030174
Minich, Julie A. (2016). Enabling Whom? Critical Disability Studies Now. Lateral, 5(1).
Morcel, Karine, Camborieux, Laure, Programme de Recherches sur les Aplasies Müllériennes, & Guerrier, Daniel (2007). Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 13(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-2-13
Oliver, Mike. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. Macmillan.
Osório, Rafael Guerreiro (2021). A desigualdade racial no Brasil nas três últimas décadas [Racial inequality in Brazil in the last three decades]. Institute for Applied Economic Research.
Paula, Luciane de, & Lopes, Ana Carolina Siani (2020). A eugenia de Bolsonaro: leitura bakhtiniana de um projeto de holocausto à brasileira [Bolsonaro's eugenics: bakhtinian reading of a brazilian holocaust project]. Revista Linguasagem, 35(1), 35-76.
Pedro, Joana Maria (2003). A experiência com contraceptivos no Brasil: uma questão de geração [The contraceptive experience in Brazil: a generational issue]. Revista Brasileira de História, 23(45), 239-260.
Pereira, Dirceu H. M. (2011). A história da reprodução humana no Brasil [The history of human reproduction in Brazil]. Femina, 39(2), 59-64.
Pickering, Andrew (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago Press.
Ramazanoglu, Caroline, & Holland, Janet (2002). Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. Sage.
Richards, Elliott. G., Agatisa, Patricia. K., Davis, Anne. C., Flyckt, Rebecca, Mabel, Hilary, Falcone, Tommaso, Tzakis, Andreas, & Farrell, Ruth M. (2019). Framing the diagnosis and treatment of absolute uterine factor infertility: Insights from in-depth interviews with uterus transplant trial participants. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 10(1), 23-35.
Rodrigues, Marcio A. Hipolito, & Carneiro, Marcia Mendonça (2022). La contraception dans d’autres pays - État de la situation au Brésil [Contraception in other countries: The example of Brazil]. Médecine/Sciences, 38(3), 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2022029
Safatle, Vladimir (2022). Economics is the continuation of psychology by other means: Psychic suffering and neoliberalism as a moral economy. Cultural Dynamics, 34(3), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/09213740221103167
Scavone, Lucila (1998). Tecnologias Reprodutivas: novas escolhas, antigos conflitos [Reproductive Technologies: new choices, old conflicts]. Cadernos Pagu, 10, 83-112.
Schurr, Carolin (2017). From biopolitics to bioeconomies: The ART of (re‐)producing white futures in Mexico's surrogacy market. Environment and Planning D, 35, 241–262.
Schurr, Carolin (2018). The baby business booms: Economic geographies of assisted reproduction. Geography Compass, 12(8), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12395
Shakespeare, Tom (1994). Cultural Representation of Disabled People: Dustbins for Disavowal? Disability & Society, 9(3), 283-299.
Shakespeare, Tom (2004). Social models of disability and other life strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410409512636
Shanley, Mary Lyndon, & Asch, Adrienne (2009). Involuntary childlessness, reproductive technology, and social justice: The medical mask on social illness. Signs: Journal of Women in Cultural and Society, 34(4), 851–874.
Siebers, Tobin (2008). Disability Experience on Trial. In Stacy Alaimo & Susan Hekman (Eds.), Material Feminisms (pp. 291-305). Indiana University Press.
Sousa Santos, Boaventura de (2020). A cruel pedagogia do vírus [The cruel pedagogy of the vírus]. Boitempo.
Souza, Maria do Carmo B. (2014). Latin America and access to Assisted Reproductive Techniques: a Brazilian perspective. JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 18(2), 47-51.
Telles, Edward (2014). Pigmentocracies: Ethnicity, Race, and Color in Latin America. University of North Carolina Press.
Thompson, Charis (2002). Fertile Ground: Feminists Theorize Infertility. In Marcia Inhorn & Frank van Balen (Eds.), Infertility Around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies (pp. 52-78). University of California Press.
Tremain, Shelley (2005). Foucault, Governmentality, and Critical Disability Theory. In Shelley Tremain (Ed.), Foucault and the Government of Disability (pp. 1–26). University of Michigan Press.
Tremain, Shelley (2015). This is what a historicist and relativist feminist philosophy of disability looks like. Foucault Studies, 19, 7-42.
Tuana, Nancy (2008). Viscous Porosity: Witnessing Katrina. In Stacy Alaimo & Susan Hekman (Eds.), Material Feminism (pp. 188-213). Indiana University Press.
Tuana, Nancy (2019). Climate Apartheid: The Forgetting of Race in the Anthropocene. Critical Philosophy of Race , 7(1), 1-31.
Tuin, Iris van der, & Dolphijn, Rick (2012). Introduction: A "New Tradition" in Thought. In Iris van der Tuin & Rick Dolphijn (Eds.), New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies (pp. 85-92). Open Humanities Press.
Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS). (1976). Fundamental Principles of Disability. UPIAS.
Weinbaum, Alys E. (2019). The afterlife of reproductive slavery: biocapitalism and Black feminism’s philosophy of history. Duke University Press.
Wilbert, Chris (2006). Profit, plague and poultry: The intra-active worlds of highly pathogenic avian flu. Radical Philosophy, 139, 2-8.
Žižek, Slavoj (2012). Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. Verso Books.
Descàrregues
Publicades
Número
Secció
Llicència
Drets d'autor (c) 2023 Caynnã Santos
Aquesta obra està sota una llicència internacional Creative Commons Reconeixement 4.0.
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- Texts will be published under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, provided they include an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship, its initial publication in this journal and the terms of the license.
