Introducing a personal learning environment in higher education. An analysis of connectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2016.29.1-14Keywords:
connectivity indicators, Elgg, higher education, personal learning environment, techno-pedagogical designAbstract
Universities have a key role to play in the progress and development of the Knowledge Society. They should lead the way in the design of teaching strategies that promote knowledge building. Personal learning environments (PLE) represent a groundbreaking new development in educational practices through the incorporation of Information and Communications Technology (ICT), and an opportunity to promote the creation of universities without walls able to meet the demands of the knowledge society.
This study focuses on the relationships established by the participants (students and teachers) in two higher education instructional sequences using institutionally-powered PLE (iPLE). One of the sequences was carried out at the University of Barcelona and the other at the University of Andorra. Both used the same technological support, the Elgg platform, which allows users to build their own personal work and learning environment. The main hypothesis of the study is that the relationships formed depend on the techno-pedagogical design of the teaching and learning process.
The results show that in both cases the relationships that the participants establish with their peers and teachers are indeed related to the characteristics and requirements of the particular techno-pedagogical designs. Although the technological environment allowed all the participants to establish relationships with others, the main interactions were found in small working groups created to carry out learning and assessment activities. In conclusion, we stress the importance of planning teaching and learning activities and assessment processes that are able to exploit the full potential of PLE.
References
Adell, J. & Castañeda, L. (2010). Los Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje (PLEs): una nueva manera de en-tender el aprendizaje. In Roig Vila, R. & Fiorucci, M. (Eds.) Claves para la investigación en innovación y calidad educativas. La integración de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación y la Intercultur-alidad en las aulas. Strumenti di ricerca per l’innovazione e la qualità in ámbito educativo. La Tecnologie dell’informazione e della Comunicazione e l’interculturalità nella scuola. Alcoy: Marfil – Roma TRE Univer-sita degli Studi. Anderson, T. (2006). PLEs versus LMS: Are PLEs ready for Prime time? In http://www.elearningeuropa.info/files/media/media11561.pdf Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Environments. The future of e-learning? eLearning Papers, 2(1). In http://www.elearningeuropa.info/files/media/media11561.pdf Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analy-sis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies. Bustos, A. (2011). Presencia docente distribuida. Doctoral thesis presented at the Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación de la Facultad de Psicología, Universitat de Barcelona. Casquero, O. (2013). Composición y estructura de redes personales en entornos de aprendizaje personales. In L. Castañeda & J.Adell (Eds.), Entornos personales de aprendizaje: claves para el ecosistema educativo en red (pp. 151-160). Alcoy: Marfil Casquero, O., Ovelar, R., Romo, Benito, M. & Alberdi, M. (2013). Students' personal networks in virtual and personal learning environments: a case study in higher education using learning analytics approach. In-teractive Learning Environments. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2013.817441 Casquero, O., Portillo, J., Ovelar, R., Benito, M. & Romo, J. (2010). iPLE network: An integrated eLearning 2.0 architecture from university's perspective. Interactive Learning Environment, 18(3). doi: 10. 1080/10494820.2010.500553 Coll, C. (2004). Psicología de la educación y prácticas educativas mediadas por las tecnologías de la infor-maciónn y la comunicación. Una mirada constructivista. Sinéctica, 25, 1-24. Coll, C., Engel, A. & Bustos, A. (2009). Distributed Teaching Presence and Participants’ Activity Profiles: a theo-retical approach to the structural analysis of Asynchronous Learning Networks. European Journal of Edu-cation, 44(4), 521-538. Coll, C., Engel, A., Saz, A. & Bustos, A. (2014). Los entornos personales de aprendizaje en la educación superi-or: del diseño al uso. Cultura y Educación, 26, 775-801. Coll, C., Mauri, T. & Onrubia, J. (2008). La utilización de las TIC en la educación: del diseño tecno-pedagógico a las prácticas de uso. In C. Coll & C. Monereo (Eds.), Psicología de la educación virtual. Enseñar y aprender con las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (pp.74-104). Madrid: Morata. Coll, C., Onrubia, J. & Mauri, T. (2008). Ayudar a aprender en contextos educativos: el ejercicio de la influencia educativa y el análisis de la enseñanza. Revista de Educación, 346, 33-70. De Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R. J. (2007). Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for Social Network Analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 87-103. Downes, S. (2007). Learning networks in practice. Emerging Technologies for Learning, 2, 19-27. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks, conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), (1978-1979), 215–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7. Hall, R. (2009). Towards a fusion of formal and informal learning environments: The impact of the Read/Write web. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(1), 29-40. Martindale, T. & Dowdy, M. (2010). Personal Learning Environments. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging tech-nologies in distance education (pp. 177-193). Edmonton: AU Press, Athabasca University. Reffay, C. & Martínez-Monés, A. (2013). Basic concepts and techniques in social network analysis. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Ed.), Handbook of Design in Educational Technology, (pp. 448-456). New York: Taylor & Francis. Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., & Segers, M. (2009). The role of academic motivation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1195-1206. Savery, J.R., & Duffy, T.M. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135-148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: a handbook. London: Sage. ISBN: 0-8039-8480-4. Stefanone, M. A., & Gay, G. (2008). Structural reproduction of social networks in computer-mediated communi-cation forums. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27(2), 97-106. Van Harmelen, M. (2008). Design trajectories: four experiments in PLE implementation. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 35-46. Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Madrid: Critica. (English version published in 1978)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- The texts published in Digital Education Review, DER, are under a license Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4,0 Spain, of Creative Commons. All the conditions of use in: Creative Commons,
- In order to mention the works, you must give credit to the authors and to this Journal.
- Digital Education Review, DER, does not accept any responsibility for the points of view and statements made by the authors in their work.
