Reserved seats for the mapuche in the Constitutional Convention: an institutional gap thanks to the revolt

Authors

  • Germán Bidegain Universidad de la República
  • Vitor Tricot Salomón Universitat de Girona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/ACS2021.12.1

Keywords:

Constitutional Convention, Indigenous reserved seats, Mapuche Movement, Chile

Abstract

In 2020 Chile found itself immersed in the most important institutional debate since the end of the dictatorship: the constitutional plebiscite that enabled the calling of elections for a Constitutional Convention. This article will focus on analyzing the debates and actions of the Mapuche actors during 2020 in relation to the Chilean constituent process and, in particular, to the possibility of institutionalizing reserved seats for indigenous peoples for the first time in the country's history. For this, the work will be divided into two main sections. In the first section we will study the consequences of the “social revolt” and the different positions that arose in the Mapuche movement and population in relation to the institutional window of opportunity that the constituent debate meant. In the second part, we will focus on the rules of the game emanating from Congress, with which the Mapuche candidates and organizations that want to participate in the constitutional process must comply. In an associated way, we will present a brief characterization of the candidates and demands that have emerged in this process, trying to show if there are any kind of links with the historical demands raised by the Mapuche movement.

References

Bengoa, J. (2014). Mapuche, colonos y el Estado Nacional. Editorial Catalonia.

Bidegain, G. (2017). Cada vez más lejos: la autonomización partidaria de los movimientos sociales en Chile 1990-2014. En: J. P Luna y R. Mardones, R. (ed.), La Columna Vertebral Fracturada: revisitando intermediarios políticos en Chile (pp. 201–230). Ril editores.

Mariman, P., Caniuqueo, S., Levil, R. y Millalen, J. (2006). ¡Escucha, winka!: cuatro ensayos de Historia Nacional Mapuche y un epílogo sobre el futuro. Lom Ediciones.

Pairican, F. (2014). Malón. La rebelión del movimiento mapuche 1990-2013. Pehuén.

Precht, A. (2020). Incorporación de los Pueblos Originarios en el Proceso Constituyente. Chile. Centro de Estudios Interculturales e Indígenas - Unidad de Políticas Públicas.

Tomaselli, A. (2019). Processes and failures of prior consultations with Indigenous Peoples in Chile. En Wright, C. & Tomaselli, A. The Prior Consultation of Indigenous Peoples in Latin America: inside the Implementation Gap (pp.119-132). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351042109

Tricot, T. (2013). Autonomía. El movimiento mapuche de resistencia. CEIBO ediciones.

Tricot, T. y Bidegain, G. (2020a). 4. Participación y política institucional mapuche durante 2018. Anuario del Conflicto Social, 9, 111–146. https://doi.org/10.1344/ACS2019.9.6

Tricot, T. y Bidegain, G. (2020b). En busca de la representación política: el partido mapuche Wallmapuwen en Chile. Estudios Sociológicos, 38(113), 375–408. https://doi.org/10.2307/26916424

Tricot, T. y Bidegain, G. (2020c). Un año más de desencuentros: participación y política institucional mapuche en 2019. Anuario del Conflicto Social, 11, 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1344/ACS2020.11.5

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Bidegain, G. ., & Tricot, V. (2021). Reserved seats for the mapuche in the Constitutional Convention: an institutional gap thanks to the revolt. Social Conflict Yearbook, (12), e–36979. https://doi.org/10.1344/ACS2021.12.1

Issue

Section

Yearbook of Social Conflict in Mapuche Territory 2020. Articles