Solutions or compositional processes and alternative outcomes in response to growing punitiveness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/cpyp.2022.23.40970Abstract
I will start my argument by adopting the framework set by Professor Jesús Silva Sánchez in his introductory conference to the 28th International Seminar of IBCCRIM, highlighting the role of criminal dogmatics as a not only descriptive nor a functional discipline, but an evaluative and practical one that tries to provide solutions to judicial decisions in specific cases. However, I will do it by clarifying that, in this task, criminal dogmatics should not be limited to the analysis of strictly criminal regulations in a substantial sense. On the contrary, it must incorporate the national, procedural and constitutional norms, but also the conventional ones - especially Human Rights – which frame the application of these provisions to specific cases.
Keywords: compositional processes, punitivism, gender violence.
References
- Bovino, A. (2009) “Instrumentos internacionales de derechos humanos no contractuales. Valor jurídico”, artículo digital disponible en: https://nohuboderecho.blogspot.com/search?q=instrumentos+internacionales+de+derechos+humanos
- Christie, N. (1981) Limits to Pain, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
- Christie, N. (1986) “Suitable Enemies”, in H. Bianchi and R. van Swaaningen (coordinadores) Abolitionism. Towards a Non-Repressive Approach to Crime. Amsterdam: Free University Press, pp 42-54.
- Díaz Ripollés, J. (2013) “La política Criminal en la encrucijada” en J. M. Silva Sanchéz (ed.), Estudios y debates en derecho Penal, nº 3. Editorial BdeF, Buenos Aires- Montevideo.
- Hulsman, L. (1993) “El enfoque abolicionista: políticas criminales alternativas”, págs. 75 a 104 en Sagarduy, Ramiro; Font, Enrique Andrés & Rodenas, Alejandra (coordinadores) Criminología crítica y control social: "El poder punitivo del estado". Editorial Juris, Rosario, Provincia de Santa Fe, República Argentina.
- Juliano, M. (2013) “La convención de Belém do Pará, la violencia de género y los derechos y garantías”, disponible en:
https://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/system/files/2014/12/doctrina36551.pdf
- Lopardo, M. & Rovatti, P. (2020) “Antes y después de Góngora” pags. 55 a 80 en Juliano, Mario & Vitale, Gustavo (coordinadores) Suspensión de juicio a prueba para delitos de género. Editorial Hammurabi. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Mathiesen, T. (1986) “The Politics of Abolition”, Contemporary Crises, 10, pp. 81-94.
- Mathiesen, T. (2015) The Politics of Abolition Revisited, Milton Park: Routledge.
- Rivera Beiras, I. (2012) “Tradiciones abolicionistas y escenarios (penales) contemporáneos” pgs. 42 a 44 en Bergalli, R., & Rivera Beiras, I. (coordinadores) Louk Hulsman:¿ qué queda de los abolicionismos? Barcelona: Ed. Anthropos, Observatori del sistema penal i els drets humans; Huellas, Desafío(s) 9.
- Walker, L. (2013) Amar bajo el terror. Ediciones Queimada. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carmen-Delgado-Alvarez/publication/337681645_Lenore_E_Walker_AMAR_BAJO_EL_TERROR/links/5de54577299bf10bc33a5d26/Lenore-E-Walker-AMAR-BAJO-EL-TERROR.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Crítica Penal y Poder
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
The author retains the rights of authorship and grants the journal the right of first publication.
The articles will be published under a license of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International which will appear in each of them.
The licence allows the work to be shared with third parties, provided that they acknowledge authorship, initial publication in this journal and the terms of the licence. No commercial use or derivative works may be created without the permission of the copyright holder.
In the case that the article has already been published, the original rights will be respected and they will be mentioned in a footnote.
