Empatía para una ciencia sin sufrimiento animal: un enfoque desde Lori Gruen
Resumen
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Akhtar, A. (2012). Animals and Public Health: Why Treating Animals Better is Critical to Human Welfare. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Akhtar, A. (2015). The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 24(4), 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180115000079
Almiron, N., y Khazaal, N. (2016). Lobbying Against Compassion: Speciesist Discourse in the Vivisection Industrial Complex. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(3), 256-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215613402
Bailey, J., Thew, M., y Balls, M. (2013). An Analysis of the Use of Dogs in Predicting Human Toxicology and Drug Safety. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 41(5), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291304100504
Bailey, J., Thew, M., y Balls, M. (2014). An Analysis of the Use of Animal Models in Predicting Human Toxicology and Drug Safety. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 42(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291404200306
Balls, M., y Combes, R. D. (2016). Animal Experimentation: The Statistics Speak for Themselves. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 44(6), 511-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291604400605
Balls, M., y Combes, R. D. (2017). Animal Experimentation and Alternatives: Revealed Preferences. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 45(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291704500103
Barnes, D. J. (1987). The Case Against the Use of Animals in Science. En M. W. Fox y L. D. Mickley (Eds.), Advances in Animal Welfare Science 1986/87 (215-226). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Bekoff, M., Gruen, L., Townsend, S. E., y Rollin, B. E. (1992). Animals in science: some areas revisited. Animal Behaviour, 44(3), 473-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(92)90057-G
Biller-Andorno, N., Grimm, H., y Walker, R. L. (2015). Professionalism and ethics in animal research. Nature Biotechnology, 33(10), 1027-1028.
Bowles, E. (2018). The Myth of Replacement and the Legal Reality. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 46(1), 39-41.
Comisión Europea (2020). Informe de 2019 sobre las estadísticas relativas al uso de animales con fines científicos en los Estados miembros de la Unión Europea en 2015-2017. COM/2020/16 final. Recuperado de https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0016
Corporate Europe Observatory (2012). Divide & Conquer: A look behind the scenes of the EU pharmaceutical industry lobby. Recuperado de https://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/28_march_2012_divideconquer.pdf
Corporate Europe Observatory (2015). Policy prescriptions: The firepower of the EU pharmaceutical lobby and implications for public health. Recuperado de https://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/20150904_bigpharma_web.pdf
Cuomo, C. J., y Gruen, L. (1998). On Puppies and Pussies: Animals, Intimacy, and Moral Distance. En B-A. Bar On y A. Ferguson (Eds.), Daring to be good: essays in feminist ethico-politics (p. 129-142). New York: Routledge.
Donovan, J. (1996). Attention to Suffering: A feminist caring ethic for the treatment of animals. Journal of Social Philosophy 27(1), 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.1996.tb00228.x
Donovan, J. (2006). Feminism and the Treatment of Animals: From Care to Dialogue. Signs 31(2), 305-329.
European Patient’s Academy (2015). Key principles of pharmacology. Recuperado de https://www.eupati.eu/non-clinical-studies/key-principles-pharmacology/
Gruen, L. (2009). Attending to Nature: Empathetic Engagement with the More than Human World. Ethics and the Environment, 14(2), 23-38.
Gruen, L. (2011). Ethics and Animals: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gruen, L. (2012). Navigating Difference (again): Animal Ethics and Entangled Empathy. En G. R. Smulewicz-Zucker (Ed.), Strangers to Nature: Animal Lives and Human Ethics (p. 213-234). Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
Gruen, L. (2013). Entangled empathy: an alternative approach to animal ethics. En R. Corbey y A. Lanjouw (Eds.), The Politics of Species: Reshaping our Relationships with Other Animals (p. 223-231). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gruen, L. (2015). Entangled Empathy: An Alternative Ethic for Our Relationships with Animals. New York: Lantern Books.
Gruen, L. (2017). Expressing Entangled Empathy: A Reply. Hypatia, 32(2), 452-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12326
Gruen, L. (2018). Empathy in mind. En K. Andrews y J. Beck (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of animal minds (p. 485-490). New York: Routledge.
Herrmann, K. (2019). Refinement on the Way Towards Replacement: Are We Doing What We Can? En K. Herrmann y K. Jayne (Eds.), Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change (p. 3-64). Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Knight, A. (2019). Critically Evaluating Animal Research. En K. Herrmann y K. Jayne (Eds.), Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change (p. 321-340). Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Kolar, R. (2006). Animal Experimentation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 111-122.
Kolar, R. (2015). How Long Must They Suffer? Success and Failure of our Efforts to End the Animal Tragedy in Laboratories. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 43(2), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291504300206
Leyton, F. (2010). Problemas Bioéticos de la experimentación con Animales no-Humanos. dA. Derecho Animal: Forum of Animal Law Studies, 1(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.203
Leyton, F. (2014). Bioética frente a los derechos animales: tensión en las fronteras de la filosofía moral (Tesis doctoral, Universitat de Barcelona). http://hdl.handle.net/10803/292240
Leyton, F. (2019). Los animales en la bioética: Tensión en las fronteras del antropocentrismo. Barcelona: Herder Editorial.
Parlamento Europeo (2010). Directiva 2010/63/UE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 22 de septiembre de 2010, relativa a la protección de los animales utilizados para fines científicos. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea, L 276, 33-79.
Rollin, B. E. (2006). Animal Rights and Human Morality (3a ed.). New York: Prometheus Books.
Rollin, B. E. (2012). Ethics and Animal Research. En J. R. Garrett (Ed.), The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy (p. 19-30). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Taylor, K. (2019). Recent Developments in Alternatives to Animal Testing. En K. Herrmann y K. Jayne (Eds.), Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change (p. 585-609). Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Téllez Ballesteros, E. E., y Vanda Cantón, B. (2019). La enseñanza con animales en las ciencias biomédicas: un modelo injusto que se perpetúa. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Críticos Animales, VI(II), 139-153. http://revistaleca.org/journal/index.php/RLECA/article/view/241
Walker, M. U. (1989). Moral Understandings: Alternative “Epistemology” for a Feminist Ethics. Hypatia, 4(2), 15-28.
Wellcome (2020). What researchers think about the culture they work in. Recuperado de https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/what-researchers-think-about-the-culture-they-work-in.pdfDOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2021.51.31257
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Copyright (c) 2021 Pablo Serra Palao

Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
© 2004-2019 Máster en Bioética y Derecho - Observatori de Bioètica i Dret - Cátedra UNESCO de Bioética - Universitat de Barcelona