Distinguish Patients in a Vegetative State from the Minimally Conscious state: moral and legal dilemmas

Autores/as

  • Silvia Zullo School of Law of the University of Bologna.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2013.27.7515

Palabras clave:

vegetative state, minimally conscious state, right to self-determination, best interest, neuroimaging

Resumen

Research done using current neuroimaging techniques specifically, positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (functional MRI)—have provided evidence that vegetative patients may have fragments of consciousness. These findings make all the more urgent the familiar moral and legal dilemmas arising in connection with persons in these "reduced" states, because in debating whether these persons have a will, we have to take into account the possibility that they may have "glimpses of consciousness". In other words, we have to revisit that principle in light of scientific advances enabling us to more accurately detect signs that a patient is expressing a will to be taken off life support.

Biografía del autor/a

Silvia Zullo, School of Law of the University of Bologna.

Investigador de Bioética de la CIRSFID - Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Bolonia.

Descargas

Publicado

2013-01-02

Número

Sección

Sección General