Women transforming Sant Roc’s public space.
What does community Social Work provide?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/its.i2.37059Keywords:
community Social Work, participation, women, emancipation, public spaceAbstract
A unique case study is presented on a community social work experience around the improvement of their local environment by organized women named ‘Dones i Barri’ in a multicultural peripheral neighborhood with a weak social links, and an intensive and conflictive use of public space. This practice, accompanied by a social worker, is comissioned to support a process of collective strengthening to activate the neighborhood participation. To this end, techniques linked to research-Action-Participatory methodologies are applied, such as, for example, collective mapping and participatory surveying; collaborative artistic methodologies, with ephemeral and ‘Arpilleras’ public art techniques. And the methodologies of popular education as the circles of collective learning and the historical-temporal lines. This text describes these techniques that in different degrees, modes and intensities allow an integrated, dynamic and fluid development between the educational, social and political dimension in the core development of an emancipatory Community Social Work. Among the main contributions we find: 1. An educational approach that provides self-confidence and a greater centrality in themselves. 2. A greater social organization of the group, which favors co-leadership and the appropriation of action-reflection, which allows them to move from indignation to the construction of a collective action project 3. Increases the public visibility of women favoring a more situated political position that impacts both its close networks and the community role of the neighborhood’s commitment to the neighborhood.
References
Addams, J., y Maurandi, R. (com.) (2014). Veinte años en Hull House. Universidad de Murcia.
Akesson, B., Burns, V., & Hordyk, S. R. (2017). The Place of Place in Social Work: Rethinking the Person-in Environment Model in Social Work Education and Practice. Journal of Social Work Education,53(3), 372-383. https://doi.org/g9f4
Alcázar-Campos, A. (2014). Miradas feministas y/o de género al Trabajo Social, un análisis crítico. Portularia, 14(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/g36w
Augé, M. (2020). Los no lugares. Gedisa Editorial. Biggs, S., & Carr, A. (2015). Age and Child Friendly Cities and the Promise of intergenerational. Space Journal of Social Work Practice, 29(1), 99-112. https://doi.org/g9f3
Blanco, I., Nel·lo, O., Barbieri, N., y Al., E. (2018). Barrios y crisis crisis económica, segregación urbana e innovación social en Cataluña. Tirant humanidades.
Bryant, L., & Livholts, M. (2007). Exploring the Gendering of Space by Using Memory Work as a Reflexive Research Method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(3),29-44. https://doi.org/gcdtt5
Bryant, L., & Williams, C. (2020). Place and space in social work. Qualitative Social Work, 19(3),321-336. https://doi.org/gcdtt5
Capous-Desyllas, M., & Morgaine, K. (2018). Creating Social Change Through Creativity Anti-Oppressive Arts-Based Research Methodologies. Springer Publishing. https://doi.org/g366
Chinchilla, I. (2021). La ciudad de los cuidados. Catarata. Col·lectiu Punt 6, Ciocoletto, A., Casanovas, R., Fonseca, M., Ortíz, S., y Valdivia, B. (2019). Urbanismo feminista. Por una transformación radical de los espacios de vida. Virus Editorial.
Dalsoto, M. P. B., y Luchese, T. Â. (2019). Círculos de Cultura: história de uma prática de educação popular. Reflexão e Ação, 27(3), 72-90. https://doi.org/g368h
De Robertis, C. (2012). Evoluciones metodológicas del trabajo social en los nuevos contextos. Azarbe: Revista Internacional de Trabajo Social y Bienestar, 1, 39-48.
Delgado, M., y Miranda, A. (2015). El espacio público como ideología. Catarata.
Dominelli, L., y MacLeod, E. (1999). Trabajo social feminista. Universitat de València.
Filigrana, P. (2020). El pueblo gitano contra el sistema-mundo: reflexiones desde una militancia feminista y anticapitalista. Akal.
Fombuena, J. (2019). Convertir el Trabajo Social en una profesión posible. Cambiar para permanecer. En E. Sobremonte de Mendicuti y A. Rodríguez (Ed.), El trabajo social en un mundo en transformación: ¿Distintas realidades o nuevos relatos para la intervención? (p. 115-156).
Fook, J. (2017). «Being Accepted» and «Being Accepted»?, Social Work with Groups, 40 (1-2),161-167. https://doi.org/g37b
Forde, C., & Lynch, D. (2014). Critical practice for challenging times: Social workers’ engagement with community work. British Journal of Social Work, 44(8), 2078-2094. https://doi.org/f6r2gt
Freire, P. (1968/1987). Pedagogia del Oprimido. Siglo XXI.
Freire, P., & Moch, M. (1990). A Critical Understanding of Social Work. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 1(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/chf5gm
Garcés, M. (2019). Emancipació. En Humanitats en acció (p. 235-240). Raig Verd Editorial.
Gehl, J. (2015). Ciudades para la gente. Ediciones Infinito.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Thepry Revisited, 1, 201-233.
Guevara, C. A. (2000). La educación popular: campo de acción profesional del trabajador social. Telos: Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales, 17(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/fgnd33
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575. https://doi.org/bvtwq4
Harvey, D. (2013). Ciudades rebeldes: del derecho de la ciudad a la revolución urbana. Akal.
Healy, K. (2020). Doing Critical Social Work: Transforming Practices for Social Justice. Australian Social Work, 73(3), 7-8. https://doi.org/g363
Jacobs, J. (1961/2011). Muerte y vida de las grandes ciudades. Capitan Swing.
Lefebvre, H. (1974/2014). La producción del espacio. Capitán Swing.
Martínez, J. (2020). La interseccionalidad como herramienta analítica para la praxis crítica del Trabajo Social. Reflexiones en torno a la soledad no deseada. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 33(2), 379-390. https://doi.org/gmgz8b
Massey, D. (2012). Espacio, lugar y política en la coyuntura actual. Urban, 4, 7-12.
Massey, D. B. (1994). Space, place and gender. Polity Press.
Morley, C., & O’bree, C. (2021). Critical Reflection: An Imperative Skill for Social Work Practice in Neoliberal Organisations? Social sciences, 97(10), 2-17. https://doi.org/f55s
Nel·lo, O., Cruz, H., i Ismael, B. (2020). Les polítiques de rehabilitació enfront la segregació: El Pla de Barris de Barcelona. Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 63, 118-132. https://raco.cat/index.php/PapersIERMB/article/view/381017
Nussbaum, M. C. (2012). Crear capacidades: propuesta para el desarrollo humano. Paidós.
Pallasmaa, J. (2016). Habitar. Gustavo Gili.
Parra, B. (2018). El trabajo social de grupo en la actualidad: la utilización de los vínculos para la promoción del cambio social [Tesis Doctoral, Universitat de Barcelona]. Dipòsit Digital Universitat de Barcelona. https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/482214
Pelegrí, X. (2004). El poder del trabajo social: una aproximación de Focault. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 17, 21-43.
Planas, F., y Prat, N. (2004). Sant Roc: generando vínculos comunitarios para la transformación de un barrio en desventaja. Servicios Sociales y Política Social, 2(63), 111-133.
Planas, F., i Rodríguez, F. (2012). Bases per a un planejament global del reallotjament de población barraquista gitana. Generalitat de Catalunya.
Pombo, G. (2019). La interseccionalidad y el campo disciplinario del trabajo social: topografías en diálogo. En L. Riveiro (Ed.) Trabajo social y feminismos: perspectivas y estrategias en debate (p. 149-177). CATSPBA.
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57-83. https://doi.org/ccxt62
Ramsay, S., & Boddy, J. (2017). Environmental social work: A concept analysis. British Journal of Social Work, 47(1), 68-86. https://doi.org/gkth4t
Ríos, P. (2020). Aportaciones de las teorías relacionales y feministas al Trabajo Social. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 33(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.5209/cuts.62991
Rodríguez, M. D., y Ferreira, J. M. (2018). La dimensión política e institucional del Trabajo Social Comunitario en el ámbito local. Revista ibero-americana de estudos em educação, 13(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/g37c
Sassen, S. (2003). Contrageografías de la globalización. Género y ciudadanía en los circuitos transfronterizos. Traficantes de sueños.
Segal-Engelchin, D., Huss, E., & Massry, N. (2020). Arts Based Methodology for Knowledge Co-Production in Social Work. The British journal of Social Work, 50(4), 1277-1294. https://doi.org/g367
Tatjer, M., y Larrea, C. (2011). Barracas: la Barcelona informal del siglo XX. Ajuntament de Barcelona. Institut de Cultura.
Toolis, E. E. (2017). Theorizing Critical Placemaking as a Tool for Reclaiming Public Space. American Journal of Community Psychology, 59(1-2), 184-199. https://doi.org/gk42xg
Zamanillo, T. (2018). Entrevista con Berta Lago. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 31(2). https://doi.org/g36x
Zapf, M. K. (2010). Social Work and the Environment: Understanding People and Place. Australian Social Work, 11(3), 366-367. https://doi.org/b2gct9
Zapf, M. K. (2019). Social Work and the Environment. Critical Social Work, 11(3), 30-46. https://doi.org/g9gc
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Núria Prat Bau Prat, Núria Simó Gil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author who publishes in this journal agrees to the following terms: (1) The author retains the rights of authorship and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work, (2) The texts will be disseminated under the Creative Commons recognition license detailed in this section.
The authors certify that the submissions have not been presented and will not be presented in other scientific publications, transferring non-exclusively the exploitation rights to the journal for the dissemination of the article in any of the possible formats (print, electronic, media dissemination, social networks or any other). In the case of having been previously submitted, but not published, it is necessary to make this clarification.
The journal is published under Creative Commons Attribution-NONCOMMERCIAL 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. Immediate and free access is permitted and any user is allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full texts of the articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software or use them for any other lawful purpose as long as no commercial use is made. Manuscripts in the journal may be reproduced in whole or in part provided that the source is properly cited. Authors may deposit the final version of their accepted articles in institutional repositories or repositories of their choice.
The journal will exercise this right beyond its own media (web or print) provided that it helps the dissemination of the contents (inclusion in databases, repositories or similar of external institutions).
Dissemination of content
The journal reserves the right to disseminate in print or electronic channels the content of the articles, including social networks and media, among others.