Photography and everyday life as a construction of contemporary image and time. Reflection in contemporary art
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/Materia2018.13.5Keywords:
photography, everyday life, time, image, construction, realityAbstract
Everyday life and photography are, respectively, a new philosophical concept, for a new tempo- spatial state from Modernity, and a new technology, for a new representation / construction of reality. The strategies and changing formats in photography, reflect changes and social evolutions that, in turn, involve conceptualizations and parallel philosophical modes. The history of everyday life and that of photography / image follow paths intermingled as the culture that we live becomes more and more marked by the visual. Theorizations about everyday life (about time in the present) have gone hand in hand with artistic theorizations about image. The artistic productions reflect and at the same time illustrate this connection. We will base ourselves on the ideas of some authors like Benjamin, Lefebvre, Debord, Baudrillard, Boris Groys or Hito Steyerl, among others.
References
APPADURAI,A.,«Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy», Public Culture, vol. 2, nº 2, primavera de 1990, p. 5.
APPADURAI,A.,Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis, Minnesota University Press, 1997.
BAUDRILLARD, J., «The Precession of Simulacra», Brian Wallis (comp.) Art After Modernism: Rethinking Representation, Nueva York, New Museum of Contemporary Art, 1984.
BENJAMIN, W., Sobre el concepto de historia, Obras I, 2, Madrid, Abada, 2008.
DEBORD, G., La sociedad del espectáculo, Valencia, Pre-textos, 2000.
DURAND, R., El tiempo de la Imagen, Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca, 1998.
FONTCUBERTA,J.(ed.),Estética Fotográfica, Barcelona, Gustavo Gili, 2003.
FOSTER,H.,Elretorno de lo real, Madrid, Akal, 2001.
GROYS,B.,Volverse público. La transformación del arte en el ágora contemporánea, Buenos Aires, Caja Negra Editora, 2014.
HERNÁNDEZ NAVARRO, M. A.,«Hacer visible el pasado. El artista como historiador (benjaminiano)», Sociedades en Crisis. Europa y el concepto de estética. Actas Congreso, Madrid, Ministerio de Cultura, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 2010, p. 238-249.
MARTÍ MARÍ,S.,«Territorios del desuso: El potencial del arte para su reactivación crítica»,Territorios del desuso. 4as. Jornadas (los) Usos del arte, Valencia, La Imprenta CG, 2016, p. 1-6.
MIRZOEFF,N.,Una introducción a la cultura visual, Barcelona, Paidós, 1999.
PIERCE,Ch. S.,Écrits sur le signe(recopilados, traducidos y presentados por Gérard Deledalle), París, Seuil, col. L’ordre philosophique, 1978.
ROGOFF,I., «Studying Visual Culture», Nicholas Mirzoeff (comp.), The Visual Culture Reader, Londres, Routledge, 1998.
STEYERL,H,Los condenados de la pantalla, Buenos Aires, Caja Negra Editora, 2014.
TORRES,A., «La post-truthes un contexto en el que no importa si los hechos son verdadero o falsos».[Consulta el 2 dic. 2018] Disponible en:https://psicologiaymente.net/social/posverdad.
ZUNZUNEGUI,S.,Pensar la imagen, Madrid, Cátedra, 1998.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
|  |
