Between the number and the word: quantitative methods in business history revisited
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/rhiihr.40896Palabras clave:
biliométrico, cuantitativo, historia empresarial, historia económica, métodos, citasResumen
Este artículo amplía nuestro anterior análisis de 2010 con un doble objetivo. En primer lugar, evaluar hasta qué punto se han utilizado métodos cuantitativos en la investigación reciente sobre historia de la empresa. Y, en segundo lugar, medir el impacto que los métodos cuantitativos pueden haber tenido en las citas de artículos de esta disciplina. Utilizamos datos de las dos revistas más importantes de historia de la empresa (Business History y Business History Review) en los últimos veinte años. Observamos que, en ellas, el contenido cuantitativo no ha aumentado en términos relativos durante estos años, aunque sí que lo ha hecho en términos absolutos. Al contrario que en nuestros resultados anteriores, los métodos cuantitativos ya no tienen un impacto fácilmente perceptible en los de citas, aunque el uso explícito de teorías parece haber aumentado el atractivo de este tipo de estudios. El impacto poco claro sobre las citas puede deberse, al menos en parte, a un desfase temporal en las redes de conocimiento interdisciplinar. Asimismo, sostenemos que la creciente influencia de la economía y la historia económica, la global y la comparada, y de los métodos digitales para datos masivos requerirán en el futuro de un mayor uso de métodos cuantitativos, y que el impacto sobre las citas solo será observable en las próximas décadas.
Descargas
Citas
Abb ate, Janet. 2001. ‘Government, business, and the making of the internet’, Business History Review, 75 (1): 147-176.
Adams, Stephen B., Dustin Chamb ers, and Michael Sch ultz. 2018. ‘A moving target: The geographic evolution of Silicon Valley, 1953–1990’, Business History, 60 (6): 859-883.
Alvaro-Moya, Adoración, and Pierre-Yves Donze. 2016. ‘Business history and management studies’, Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business, 1 (1): 122-151.
Amatori, Franco, and Geoffrey Jones, eds. 2003. Business history around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Balleisen, Edward J. 2020. ‘The Prospects for Collaborative Research in Business History’, Enterprise & Society, 21 (4): 824-852.
Bergquist, Ann-Kristin, and Kristina Soderh olm. 2015. ‘Transition to greener pulp: regulation, industry responses and path dependency’, Business History, 57 (6): 862-884.
Bolt, Jutta, and Jan Luiten van Zanden. 2020. ‘Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy. A new 2020 update’. Maddison-Project Working Paper WP-15, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. Available from: http://reparti.free.fr/maddi2020.pdf [cited 28 October 28 2022].
Booth, Charles, and Michael Rowlinson. 2006. ‘Management and organizational history: Prospects’, Management & Organizational History, 1 (1): 5-30.
Buckley, Peter. J. 2021. ‘The role of history in international business: Evidence, research practices, methods and theory’, British Journal of Management, 32 (3): 797-811.
Bogenhold, Dieter. 2018. ‘Economics between Insulation and Social-Scienciation: Observations by a Sociology of Economics’, Journal of Economic Issues, 52 (4): 1125-1142.
Cain, Louis P., and Robert Whaples. 2013. ‘Economic history and cliometrics.’ In Routledge Handbook of Modern Economic History, edited by Randall E. Parker and Robert Whaples, 3-13. New York: Routledge.
Calafat, Guillaume, and Éric Monnet. 2017. ‘Return to Economic History’, Books & ideas.net, 30 January. Available from: https://booksandideas.net/The-Return-of-Economic-History.html [cited 28 October 2022].
Cantoni, Davide and Noam Yuch tman. 2021. ‘Historical natural experiments: Bridging economics and economic history’. In The Handbook of Historical Economics, edited by Alberto Bisin and Giovanni Federico, 213-241. London: Academic Press.
Cioni, Martina, Giovanni Federico, and Michelangelo Vasta. 2020. ‘The long-term evolution of economic history: evidence from the top five field journals (1927–2017)’, Cliometrica, 14 (1): 1-39.
Cioni, Martina, Giovanni Federico, and Michelangelo Vasta. 2021. ‘The two revolutions in economic history’. In The Handbook of Historical Economics, edited by Alberto Bisin and Giovanni Federico, 17-40. London: Academic Press.
Cioni, Martina, Giovanni Federico, and Michelangelo Vasta. 2023. ‘Is economic History- changing its nature? Evidence from top journals’, Cliometrica, 17: 23-48.
Clark, Peter, and Michael Rowlinson. 2004. ‘The Treatment of History in Organisation Studies: Towards an ‘Historic Turn’?’, Business History, 46: 331-352.
Colli, Andrea, and Mats Larsson. 2014. ‘Family business and business history: An exemple of comparative research’, Business History, 56 (1): 37-53.
Cortada, James W. 2018. ‘Change and continuity at IBM: Key themes in histories of IBM’, Business History Review, 92 (1): 117-148.
Decker, Stephanie, Matthias Kipping, and R. Daniel Wadhwani. 2015. ‘New business histories! Plurality in business history research methods’, Business History, 57 (1): 30-40.
Decker, Stephanie, Ray Stokes, Andrea Colli, Abe de Jong, Paloma Fernandez Perez, and Neil Rollings. 2018. ‘Change of referencing style’, Business History, 60 (1): 1-3.
De Jong, Abe, David Michael Higgins, and Hugo van Driel. 2015. ‘Towards a new Business history?’, Business History, 57 (1): 5-29.
De Jong, Abe, David Michael Higgins, and Hugo van Driel. 2017. ‘A citation analysis of business history and related disciplines’. In The Routledge Companion to Business History, edited by John F. Wilson, Steven Toms, Abe de Jong and Emily Buchnea, 36-54. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Diebolt, Claude, and Michael Haupert, eds. 2016a. Handbook of cliometrics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands (Imprint: Springer).
Diebolt, Claude, and Michael Haupert. 2016b. ‘Clio’s contributions to economics and history’, Revue d’economie politique, 126 (5): 971-989.
Diebolt, Claude, and Michael Haupert. 2018. ‘A cliometric counterfactual: what if there had been neither Fogel nor North?’, Cliometrica, 12 (3): 407-434.
Di Vaio, Gianfranco, Daniel Waldenstrom and Jacob Weisdorf . 2012. ‘Citation success: Evidence from economic history journal publications’, Explorations in Economic History, 49 (1): 92-104.
Drayton, Richard, and David Motadel. 2018. ‘Discussion: the futures of global history’, Journal of Global History, 13 (1): 1-21.
Eloranta, Jari, Jari Ojala, and Heli Valtonen. 2010a. ‘Quantitative Methods in Business History: An Impossible Equation?’, Management & Organizational History, 5 (1): 79-107.
Eloranta, Jari, Heli Valtonen, and Jari Ojala. 2010b. ‘Methods, Topics, and Trends in Recent Business History Scholarship’, ABH Newsletter, 39 Spring: 10-14.
Eloranta, Jari, Pasi Nevalainen, and Jari Ojala. 2020. ‘Towards Big Data: Digitising Economic and Business History’. In Digital Histories: Emergent Approaches within the New Digital History, edited by Mats Friedlund, Mila Oiva and Petri Paju, 45-68. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press HUP.
Federico, Giovanni, and Antonio Tena-Junguito. 2017. ‘A tale of two globalizations: gains from trade and openness 1800–2010’, Review of World economics, 153 (3): 601-626.
Floud, Roderick. 1984. ‘Quantitative history and people’s history: Two methods in conflict?’, Social Science History, 8 (2): 151-168.
Gelderb lom, Oscar, and Francesca Trivellato. 2019. ‘The business history of the preindustrial world: Towards a comparative historical analysis’, Business History, 61 (2): 225-259.
Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gonzales. 2021. ‘Bibliometric studies outside the information science and library science field: uncontainable or uncontrollable?’, Scientometrics, 126: 6837-6870.
Gras, N. S. 1927. ‘The rise and development of economic history’, The Economic History Review, 1 (1): 12-34.
Gutmann, Myron P., Emily Klanch er Merch ant, and Evan Roberts. 2018. ‘“Big data” in economic history’, The Journal of Economic History, 78 (1): 268-299.
Hamerm esh, Daniel S. 2018. ‘Citations in economics: Measurement, uses, and impacts’, Journal of Economic Literature, 56 (1): 115-156.
Hahn, Eugene D., and Siah Hwee Ang. 2017. ‘From the editors: New directions in the reporting of statistical results in the Journal of World Business’, Journal of World Business, 52 (2): 125-126.
Hannah, Leslie. 1983. ‘New issues in British business history’, Business History Review, 57 (2), 165-174.
Hannah, Leslie. 2018. ‘Business History at LSE: An Empiricist Voice’. In The Palgrave Companion to Economics, edited by Robert A. Cord, 113-143. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Hansen, Bradley A. 2014. ‘A Failure of Regulation? Reinterpreting the Panic of 1907’, Business History Review, 88 (3): 545-569.
Harvey, Charles, and John Wilson. 2007. ‘Redefining Business History: An editorial statement’, Business History, 49 (1): 1-7.
Harvey, Mark. 2016. ‘The rise of the LP: the politics of diffusion innovation in the recording industry’, Business History, 58 (7): 1095-1117.
Kieser, Alfred. 1994. ‘Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses - And how this should be performed’, Organization Science, 5 (4): 608-620
Kipping, Matthias, Takafumi Kurosawa, and R. Daniel Wadhwani. 2017. ‘A revisionist historiography of business history: A richer past for a richer future’. In The Routledge Companion to Business History, edited by John F. Wilson, Stevern Toms, Abe de Jong and Emily Buchnea, 10-35. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Kobrak, Christopher, and Andrea Sch neider. 2011. ‘Varieties of business history: Subject and methods for the twenty-first century’, Business History, 53 (3): 401-424.
Lamberg, Juha-Antti, Sandra Lubinaitė, Jari Ojala, and Henrikki Tikkanen. 2021. ‘The curse of agility: The Nokia Corporation and the loss of market dominance in mobile phones, 2003-2013’, Business History, 63 (4): 574-605.
Lamb erg, Juha-Antti, Jari Ojala, and Jan-Peter Gustafsson. 2022. ‘Strategy and Business history rejoined: How and why strategic management concepts took over Business history’, Business History, 64 (6): 1011-1039.
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Daniel M. G. Raff , and Peter Temin. 2008. ‘Economic Theory and Business History’. In The Oxford Handbook of Business History, edited by Geoffrey Jones and Jonathan Zeitlin, 37-66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Kenneth L. Sokoloff , and Dhanoos Sutthiphisal. 2013. ‘Patent Alchemy: The Market for Technology in US History’, Business History Review, 87 (1): 3-38.
Liang, Ting-Peng, and Yu-Hsi Liu. 2018. ‘Research landscape of business intelligence and big data analytics: A bibliometrics study’, Expert Systems with Applications, 111: 2-10.
Maclean, Mairi, Charles Harvey, and Steward R. Clegg. 2016. ‘Conceptualizing historical organization studies’, Academy of Management Review, 41 (4): 609-632.
Margo, Robert A. 2021. ‘The economic history of economic history: the evolution of a field in economics’. In The Handbook of Historical Economics, edited by Alberto Bisin and Giovanni Federico, 3-16. London: Academic Press.
Mazlish, Bruce. 1998. ‘Comparing global history to world history’, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 28 (3): 385-395.
McCloskey, Donald N. 1992. ‘Other things equal: The bankruptcy of statistical significance’, Eastern Economic Journal, 18 (3): 359-361.
Middell, Matthias, and Katja Naumann. 2010. ‘Global history and the spatial turn: From the impact of area studies to the study of critical junctures of globalization’, Journal of Global History, 5 (1): 149-170.
Minoglou, Ioanna. 2002. ‘Between Informal Networks and Formal Contracts: International Investment in Greece during the 1920s’, Business History, 44 (2): 40-64.
Moody, James, Achim Edelmann, and Ryan Light. 2022. ‘100 Years of Social Forces as Seen Through Bibliometric Publication Patterns’, Social Forces, 101 (1): 38-75.
O’Brien, Patrick. 2006. ‘Historiographical traditions and modern imperatives for the restoration of global history’, Journal of Global History, 1 (1): 3-39.
Ojala, Jari, Jari Eloranta, Anu Ojala, and Heli Valtonen. 2017. ‘Let the best story win. Evaluation of the most cited business history articles’, Management & Organizational History, 12 (4): 305-333.
Ojala, Jari. 2017. ‘Taloushistorian paluu ja liiketoimintahistorian nousu’, Historiallinen aikakauskirja, 115 (4): 446-456.
Peng, Lan, and Alistair M. Brown. 2016. ‘A decade of hybrid reporting and accountabilities of the Hanyeping Company (1909-1919)’, Business History, 58 (8): 1183-1209.
Perch ard, Andrew, Niall G. MacKenzie, Stephanie Decker, and Giovanni Favero. 2017. ‘Clio in the business school: Historical approaches in strategy, international business and entrepreneurship’, Business History, 59 (6): 904-927.
Popp, Andrew. 2009. ‘History, a Useful ‘Science’ for Management? A Response’, Enterprise & Society, 10 (4): 831-836.
Polonen, Janne, Mikael Laakso, Raf Guns, Emanuel Kulczycki, and Gunnar Sivertsen. 2020. ‘Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers’, Quantitative Science Studies, 1 (4): 1396-1428.
Reckendrees, Alfred. 2017. ‘Economic history in times of transition’, Scandinavian Economic History Review, 65 (1): 1-5.
Redlich , Fritz. 1962. ‘Approaches to business history’, Business History Review, 36 (1): 61-86.
Rinia, Ed J., Thed N. van Leeuwen, Eppo E. W. Bruins, Hendrik G. van Vuren, and Anthony F. J. van Raan. 2001. ‘Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange’, Scientometrics, 51 (1): 293-309.
Rousseau, Sandra, and Ronald Rousseau. 2021. ‘Bibliometric techniques and their use in business and economics research’. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35 (5): 1428-1451.
Rowlinson, Michael. 2015. ‘Historiography and the ‘historic turn’ in organization theory’. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy in Organization Studies, edited by Raza Mir, Hugh Willmot and Michelle Greenwood, 412-420. London: Routledge.
Ruggles, Steven. 2021. ‘The revival of quantification: Reflections on old new histories’, Social Science History, 45 (1): 1-25.
Scranton, Philip. 2008. ‘Beyond Chandler?’, Enterprise & Society, 9 (3): 426-429.
Seltzer, Andrew J. 2018. ‘Publication Trends and Future Challenges for the Australian Economic History Review: A Bibliometric Analysis’, Australian Economic History Review, 58 (2): 112-133.
Smith, Andrew, and Maki Umemura. 2019. ‘Prospects for a transparency revolution in the field of business history’, Business History, 61 (6): 919-941.
Steckel, Richard H. 2007. ‘Big social science history’, Social Science History, 31 (1): 1-34.
Toms, Steven, and John Wilson. 2016. ‘Business history: agendas, historiography and debates’. In The Routledge companion to business history, edited by John F. Wilson, Steven Toms, Abe de Jong and Emily Buchnea, 9-18. London: Routledge.
Usdiken, Behlül, and Alfred Kieser. 2004. ‘Introduction: History in organisation studies’, Business History, 46 (2004): 321-330.
Usdiken, Behlül, Alfred Kieser, and Peter Kjaer. 2004. ‘Academy, Economy and Polity: Betriebswirtschaftslehre in Germany, Denmark and Turkey before 1945’, Business History, 46 (3): 381-406.
Vaara, Eero, and Juha-Antti Lamb erg. 2016. ‘Taking historical embeddedness seriously: Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research’, Academy of Management Review, 41 (4): 633-657.
Van der Wel, K. A., O. Ostergren, O. Lundberg, K. Korh onen, P. Martikainen, A. M. N. Andersen, and S. K. Urh oj, 2019. ‘A gold mine, but still no Klondike: Nordic register data in health inequalities research’, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 47 (6): 618-630.
Veluwenkamp, Jan Willem, Werner Sch eltjens, and Siem Van der Woude. 2021. ‘Sound Toll Registers Online’, TSEG-The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History, 18 (1): 147-160.
Waldenstrom, Daniel. 2005. ‘Increased international integration is a prerequisite for more and better research in economic history’, Scandinavian Economic History Review, 53 (3): 85-92.
Walton, Clarence C. 1962. ‘Business history: Some major challenges’, Business History Review, 36 (1): 21-43.
Whaples, Robert. 1991. ‘A Quantitative History of the Journal of Economc History and the Cliometric Revolution’, The Journal of Economic History, 51 (2): 289-301.
Whaples, Robert. 2002. ‘The supply and demand of economic history: Recent trends in the Journal of Economic History’, The Journal of Economic History, 62 (2): 524-532.
Whaples, Robert. 2010. ‘Is economic history a neglected field of study?’, Historically Speaking, 11 (2): 17-20.
Wilson, John F., Stephen Toms, Abe de Jong, and Emily Buch nea. 2016. ‘A revisionist historiography of business history: A richer past for a richer future’. In The Routledge companion to business history, edited by John F. Wilson, and Steven Toms, Abe de Jong and Emily Buchnea, 33-49. London: Routledge.
Wilson, John F., Ian G. Jones, Steven Toms, Emily Buch nea, Anna Tilba, and Nicholas Wong, 2022. Business History: A Research Overview. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Wilson, John F., and Anna Tilba. 2023. ‘Business history and the ‘practical turn’’, Management & Organizational History, 18 (1): 111-118.
Yacob, Shakila. 2009. ‘Ford’s Investment in Colonial Malaya, 1926–1957’, Business History Review, 83 (4): 789-812.
Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2003. ‘Productive alternatives: Flexibility. Governance, and strategic choice in industrial history’. In Business history around the world, edited by Franco Amatori and Geoffrey Jones, 62-80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zeng, Z., and J. Tao (2023). ‘Business history and social media: A concise review’, Management & Organizational History, 18 (1): 24-30.
Ziliak, Stephen, and Deirdre N. McCloskey. 2008. The cult of statistical significance: How the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista de Historia Industrial — Industrial History Review
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
El/la autor/a cede los derechos al/la editor/a. Creative Commons
El/la autor/a que publica en esta revista está de acuerdo con los términos siguientes:
- El/la autor/a cede en exclusiva todos los derechos de propiedad intelectual al/la editor/a para todo el mundo y toda la duración de los derechos de propiedad intelectual vigentes aplicables.
- El/la editor/a difundirá los textos con la licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite compartir la obra con terceros, siempre que éstos reconozcan su autoría, su publicación inicial en esta revista y las condiciones de la licencia.
