Proposal for bioethics education in Animal Ethics

Authors

  • Anamaria Gonçalves dos Santos Feijó PUCRS
  • Anelise Crippa PUCRS
  • Jéssica Lauren Steffen PUCRS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2016.36.15379

Keywords:

education, bioethics, animal ethics, brazilian legislation

Abstract

This study proposes the continuous bioethics education in university health and biology courses. A field study was conducted with matriculating students at a university in southern Brazil about the ethics and legal questions regarding the use of animals in research and teaching. It was found that almost half of the students were unaware of important animal ethics issues, showing that these themes are merely incipient in the education provided within this particular university. Considering this reality, the inclusion of bioethics only as a discipline and isolated from the formal curriculum has not been effective and that bioethics education, incorporating polemic subjects such as animal ethics, should be included in an all-encompassing and constant approach throughout the training of students in biomedical fields.

Author Biographies

Anamaria Gonçalves dos Santos Feijó, PUCRS

Biologist, Ph.D. in Philosophy with emphasis in bioethics. Lecturer and coordinator of the Bioethics and Applied Animal Ethics Laboratory of the Bioethics Institute (IB) at PUCRS.

Anelise Crippa, PUCRS

Lawyer. Ph.D. student in the Biomedical Gerontology post-graduation program at the Institute of Geriatrics and Gerontology. Researcher at the Bioethics and Applied Animal Ethics Laboratory of the Bioethics Institute IB/PUCRS.

Jéssica Lauren Steffen, PUCRS

Law school graduate. Master’s student in the Animal Law and Society post-graduation program at the Autonomous University of Barcelona. Researcher at the Bioethics and Applied Animal Ethics Laboratory of the Bioethics Institute IB/PUCRS.

Downloads

How to Cite

Gonçalves dos Santos Feijó, A., Crippa, A., & Steffen, J. L. (2016). Proposal for bioethics education in Animal Ethics. Revista De Bioética Y Derecho, (36), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2016.36.15379

Issue

Section

Animal Bioethics