The controversial decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the Gard case and others against the United Kingdom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2019.0.21890Keywords:
European Court of Human Rights, Charlie Gard case, bioethics, dignified death, autonomy, euthanasia, child euthanasiaAbstract
The commented decision of the European Court of Human Rights refers to one of the most shocking and heartbreaking cases in recent times in the United Kingdom, which has had a great deal of media coverage. It raises some of the most important issues on Bioethics, such as dignified death, therapeutic cruelty, the judicialization of bioethical conflicts, patient’s autonomy by representation, passive euthanasia in childhood or the confrontation between two conceptions of bioethics: the utilitarian and the personalist. With this contribution, I will limit myself to reflecting on some of the aspects that can contribute to promote the debate, free of prejudices and fundamentalisms of all kinds, that will allow the formation of consensus, as bioethics requires in the scenario of a global world.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author retains the copyright and grants Revista de Bioética y Derecho the right of first publication of the article. All articles published in Revista de Bioética y Derecho are under Creative Commons licensing Recognition – Non Commercial – NoDerivedArtwork (by-nc-nd 4.0), which allows sharing the content with third parties, provided that they acknowledge its authorship, initial publication in this journal and the terms of the license. No commercial use of the original work or generation of derivative works is permitted.