Public Health Measures and Stigma
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2019.0.27795Keywords:
public health, social class, stigma, discrimination, democratic deliberation, ethical surveillance, public health ethics, smokingAbstract
Many public health measures can have a greater impact on certain disadvantage classes or social groups. This may attenuate, at least temporarily, the social inequalities in health as these groups have a higher prevalence of the conditions that public health measures want to address, but it can also stigmatize them, which in turn will exacerbate again health inequities. We describe the concepts of social class, classism and stigma, and analyse different currents of thought that have conceived the role of stigma within public health. It is accepted that in exceptional conditions some public health measures with certain stigmatising effects as an unintended consequence, but never deliberately, as a nuclear or exclusive component of the intervention, can be supported. Finally, we propose several conditions that must be met to avoid or minimize the stigma in public health actions: the participation of the classes and social groups involved in the decision making; independent ethical surveillance; to avoid the individualization of public health problems, which blames the victim, and emphasise that they are predominantly collective problems; sufficient compensation for the individuals and groups harmed; and the effort to confront and correct the deep and structural causes of health inequalities.References
Adler NE, Stewart J (2009) Reducing obesity: motivating action while not blaming the victim. Milbank Q 87:49–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00547.x
Amonini C, Pettigrew S, Clayforth C (2015) The potential of shame as a message appeal in antismoking television advertisements. Tob Control 24:436–441. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051737.
Bayer R (2008a) Stigma and the ethics of public health: not can we but should we. Soc Sci Med 67:463–472. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.017.
Bayer R (2008b) What means this thing called stigma? A response to Burris. Soc Sci Med 67:476–477. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.024.
Bayer R, Fairchild AL (2015) Stigma: Time for a hard conversation. Int J Drug Policy 26:613–614. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.01.017.
Bell K, Salmon A, Bowers M, et al (2010) Smoking, stigma and tobacco “denormalization”: Further reflections on the use of stigma as a public health tool. A commentary on Social Science & Medicine’s Stigma, Prejudice, Discrimination and Health Special Issue (67: 3). Soc Sci Med 70:795–799. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.060.
Burris S (2002) Disease stigma in U.S. public health law. J Law Med Ethics 30:179–190.
Burris S (2008) Stigma, ethics and policy: a commentary on Bayer’s “Stigma and the ethics of public health: Not can we but should we.” Soc Sci Med 67:473–475. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.020.
Clifford D, Hill S, Collin J (2014) Seeking out “easy targets”? Tobacco companies, health inequalities and public policy. Tob Control 23:479–483. doi:
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051050.
Courtwright A (2013) Stigmatization and public health ethics. Bioethics 27:74–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01904.x
Dean R (2014) Stigmatization and denormalization as public health policies: some Kantian thoughts. Bioethics 28:414–419. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12019.
Durante F, Fiske ST (2017) How social-class stereotypes maintain inequality. Curr Opin Psychol 18:43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.033.
Faden R, Shebaya S (2010) Public health ethics. In: Zalta IN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, First. The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Galán I, Simón L, Boldo E, et al (2017) Changes in hospitalizations for chronic respiratory diseases after two successive smoking bans in Spain. PLoS One 12:e0177979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177979.
Goffman E (1963) Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon and Schuster, New York.
Jeffrey J, Thomson M (2018) Integrating negative social cues in tobacco packaging: A novel approach to discouraging smokers. J Consum Aff. doi: 10.1111/joca.12232.
Krieger N (2001) A glossary for social epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 55:693-700.
Link BG, Phelan JC (2001) Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol 27:363–385. doi: doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363.
Mann JM (1996) Health and human rights. BMJ 312:924–925.
Mann JM, Gostin L, Gruskin S, et al (1994) Health and human rights. Health Hum Rights 1:6–23.
McCartney G, Bartley M, Dundas R, et al (2018) Theorising social class and its application to the study of health inequalities. SSM - Popul Health. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.10.015.
Ploug T, Holm S, Gjerris M (2015) The stigmatization dilemma in public health policy–the case of MRSA in Denmark. BMC Public Health 15:640. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2004-y.
Puhl RM, Heuer CA (2010) Obesity stigma: important considerations for public health. Am J Public Health 100:1019–1028. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.159491.
Rothstein MA (2015) From SARS to Ebola: Legal and ethical considerations for modern quarantine. Indian Health Law Rev 12:227–280.
Simons AMW, Houkes I, Koster A, et al (2018) The silent burden of stigmatisation: a qualitative study among Dutch people with a low socioeconomic position. BMC Public Health 18:443. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5210-6.
Simons AMW, Koster A, Groffen DAI, Bosma H (2017) Perceived classism and its relation with socioeconomic status, health, health behaviours and perceived inferiority: the Dutch Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences (LISS) panel. Int J Public Health 62:433–440. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0880-2.
Skrabanek P (1990) Why is preventive medicine exempted from ethical constraints? J Med Ethics 16:187–190.
The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (2016a) Bioethics for Every Generation. Deliberation and Education in Health, Science, and Technology. Washington,D.C. Disponible en: https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcsbi/sites/default/files/PCSBI_Bioethics-Deliberation_0.pdf. Consultado el 9 de enero de 2019.
The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (2016b) Guide to Democratic Deliberation for Public Health Ethics Professionals. Washington,D.C. Disponible en https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcsbi/sites/default/files/3%20Guide%20to%20Deliberation%20for%20Public%20Health%20Professionals%2010.30.16.pdf. Consultado el 9 de enero de 2019.
Thomas S, Fayter D, Misso K, et al (2008) Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review. Tob Control 17:230–237. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.023911.
Tognotti E (2013) Lessons from the history of quarantine, from plague to influenza A. Emerg Infect Dis 19:254–259. doi: 10.3201/eid1902.120312.
Underwood MJ, Bailey JS (1993) Coronary bypass surgery should not be offered to smokers. BMJ 306:1047–1048.
Wang TW, Asman K, Gentzke AS, et al (2018) Tobacco product use among adults - United States, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 67:1225–1232. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6744a2
Willison DJ, Ondrusek N, Dawson A, et al (2014) What makes public health studies ethical? Dissolving the boundary between research and practice. BMC Med Ethics 15:61. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-61.
Wright EO (2015) Understanding class. Verso, London.
(2017) Pautas de la OMS sobre la ética en la vigilancia de la salud pública. Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Washington, D.C. Disponible en:
http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/34499/9789275319840-spa.pdf?sequence=6. Consultado el 9 de enero de 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author retains the copyright and grants Revista de Bioética y Derecho the right of first publication of the article. All articles published in Revista de Bioética y Derecho are under Creative Commons licensing Recognition – Non Commercial – NoDerivedArtwork (by-nc-nd 4.0), which allows sharing the content with third parties, provided that they acknowledge its authorship, initial publication in this journal and the terms of the license. No commercial use of the original work or generation of derivative works is permitted.