Breast is a breast is a breast is a breast
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2021.54.36281Abstract
The Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals (BSUH) Trust, in England, recently published an inclusive language guideline for its maternity services. The guideline calls for the removal of female-only terms such as “breast milk” or “mother”, in order to accommodate transgender men who can become pregnant. Along the guideline is a “language preferences” form, on which patients can list their preferred terms for clinicians to refer to their anatomical parts and healthcare procedures. In this paper, we discuss the BSUH guideline. From this discussion, we reflect on inclusive language initiatives in specific contexts. We explain why we believe some of these initiatives to be counterproductive and to respond more to policy managers’ fear rather than to an actual demand from the groups concerned. We also believe that medical terminology is not subject to individual patients’ intimate feelings, nor to their gender identity, but is a shared scientific heritage belonging to a profession and, ultimately, to the entire community.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Lorenzo Gallego Borghini, José Juan Quilantán Cabrera, Hugo Alexander Garcés Garcés
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author retains the copyright and grants Revista de Bioética y Derecho the right of first publication of the article. All articles published in Revista de Bioética y Derecho are under Creative Commons licensing Recognition – Non Commercial – NoDerivedArtwork (by-nc-nd 4.0), which allows sharing the content with third parties, provided that they acknowledge its authorship, initial publication in this journal and the terms of the license. No commercial use of the original work or generation of derivative works is permitted.