Teaching a culture of care: Why it matters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2021.51.31130Palabras clave:
laboratory animals, care, welfare, education, wellbeing, professional responsibilityResumen
The use of animal in biomedical research remains a critical compromise. Research and higher education institutions play a major role in educating on the use of animal and such training is expected to translate into the development of a culture of care practice across all staff working with animals. But nurturing a “culture of care” and impacting in professional attitudes in the field of animal research remains challenging due to its social, ethical and different institutional frameworks. From an educational perspective, current practice remains challenged by the need for better integration of inter-cultural perceptions on animal welfare, supported by more cross disciplinary integration in educational curriculum including the relevance of the 3Rs principles and promoting reflective practice strategies. Institutional support is crucial to provide a safe, and supportive framework to promote such caring ethos. Our aim is to discuss practical actions to implement and assess culture of care, highlighting its direct impact on the professional integrity of staff which is directly linked to research and education excellence. Seeking a global welfare for all the beings involved and supporting individual and team reflective practice will provide better tools to guarantee the best care of the animals.
Citas
1. Robinson S, Sparrow S, Williams B, Decelle T, Bertelsen T, Reid K, et al. The European Federation of the Pharmaceutical Industry and Associations' Research and Animal Welfare Group: Assessing and benchmarking 'Culture of Care' in the context of using animals for scientific purpose. Laboratory animals. 2019:23677219887998.
2. Hawkins P, Bertelsen T. 3Rs-Related and Objective Indicators to Help Assess the Culture of Care. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI. 2019;9(11).
3. Brown MJ, Symonowicz C, Medina LV, Bratcher NA, Buckmaster CA, Klein H, et al. Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities. In: nd, Weichbrod RH, Thompson GAH, Norton JN, editors. Management of Animal Care and Use Programs in Research, Education, and Testing. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis (c) 2018 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.; 2018. p. 11-26.
4. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS biology. 2010;8(6):e1000412.
5. Smith AJ, Clutton RE, Lilley E, Hansen KEA, Brattelid T. Improving animal research: PREPARE before you ARRIVE. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2018;360:k760.
6. Responsibility in the use of animals in bioscience research 2014. Available from: file:///C:/Users/hmx334/Desktop/Responsibility%20in%20the%20use%20of%20animals%20in%20bioscience%20research%20-%20July%202015.pdf. (Accessed 28 March 2020)
7. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes Text with EEA relevance. Off J Eur Union. 2010;276 33-79. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32010L0063 (Accessed on 28 March 2020)
8. National Research Council (US). Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th edition. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54050/ doi: 10.17226/12910. National Academies Press (US). 2011(8th).
9. Biggs JB TC. Teaching for quality learning at university. 4th ed: Open University Press/Mc Graw-Hill Education.; 2007.
10. KolbD. Experiential Learning. Experiential Learning: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.; 1984.
11. A working document on the development of a common education and training framework to fulfil the requirements under the Directive [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/pdf/Endorsed_E-T.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2020)
12. The Brown Report: "Independent Investigation into Animal Research at Imperial College London" [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://brownreport.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/The-Brown-Report.pdf (Accessed on 28 March 2020).
13. T Boden PH. Communicating the Culture of Care – how to win friends and influence people. Animals Technology and Welfare. 2016:151-6.
14. Singer P. Animal Liberation. New York Avon Books.; 1975.
15. Animals in Science Regulation Unit Compliance Policy [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/670174/ASRU_Compliance_Policy_December_Final.pdf. (Accessed 28 March 2020).
16. Friese C, Latimer J. Entanglements in Health and Well-being: Working with Model Organisms in Biomedicine and Bioscience. Medical anthropology quarterly. 2019;33(1):120-37.
17. K Davies LD. Can caring for laboratory animals be classified as Emotional Labour? . Anim Technol Welfare 2010;9:1-6.
18. European Commission. A Working Document on Animal Welfare Bodies and National Committees to fulfil the Requirements under the Directive; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014. Available online: https: //ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/pdf/guidance/animal_welfare_bodies/en.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2020).
19. European Commission. A Working Document on Inspections and Enforcement to fulfil the Requirements under the Directive; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/pdf/endorsed_inspection-enforcement.pdf [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/pdf/endorsed_inspection-enforcement.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2020).
20. Identification and management of patterns of low-level concerns at licensed establishments. Animals in Science Regulation Unit. 2015. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/512098/Patterns_low-level_concerns.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2020).
21. Culture of Care Network. Communication and the Culture of Care. Norecopa. Available online: https://norecopa.no/media/8159/communication-and-the-culture-of-care-from-the-culture-of-care-network.pdf [Internet]. 2018. (Accessed 28 March 2020).
22. Universities UK (2019, October). The Concordat to Support Research Integrity. Retrieved from https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2019/the-concordat-to-support-research-integrity.pdf [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2019/the-concordat-to-support-research-integrity.pdf.
23. 2017. Available from: https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
24. Concordant-UAR. Concordant on openness on animal research in the UK. http://concordatopenness.org.uk/. 2014.
25. Mill JS. "On Liberty". In: On Liberty and Other Essays. Ed. Stefan Collini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Collini S, editor: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
26. Towards a Research Integrity Culture at Universities: From Recommendations to Implementation University. League of European Research Universities. LERU publications. https://www.leru.org/files/Towards-a-Research-Integrity-Culture-at-Universities-full-paper.pdf [Internet]. 2020. (Accessed 28 March 2020).
27. The reflective practitioner. Guidance for doctors and medical students. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, the UK Conference of Postgraduate Medical Deans, the General Medical Council, and the Medical Schools Council. https://www.ficm.ac.uk/sites/default/files/reflective_practioner_guidance.pdf . 2018. (Accessed 28 March 2020).
28. Gibbs, G. (1988) Learning by doing. A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford Polytechnic: Oxford. [Internet]. Oxford Polytechnic: Oxford.1988.
29. Gibson J. The five ‘Es’ of an excellent teacher.The Clinical Teacher, 2009. Vol 6, Issue 1:3-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2008.00239.x.
30. ASPA. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. Consolidated version of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 with amendment Regulations 2012 to include the changes that were effected by those Regulations on 1 January 2013. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/619140/ConsolidatedASPA1Jan2013.pdf. 1986. (Accessed 28 March 2020).
31. Higher education: teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice; Fulfilling our Potential: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice . https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/higher-education-teaching-excellence-social-mobility-and-student-choice. 2016. (Accessed 28 March 2020).
32. Gyger M, Berdoy M, Dontas I, Kolf-Clauw M, Santos AI, Sjoquist M. FELASA accreditation of education and training courses in laboratory animal science according to the Directive 2010/63/EU. Laboratory animals. 2019;53(2):137-47.
33. Harmonisation of education, training and CPD for laboratory animal caretakers and technicians - FELASA-EFAT WG. Available from: http://www.felasa.eu/working-groups/working-groups-present/felasa-efat-wg-on-harmonisation-of-education-training-and-cpd-for-laboratory-animal-caretakers-and-technicians. (Accessed on 28 March 2020).
34. LASA 2016 Guiding Principles for Supervision and Assessment of Competence as required under EU and UK legislation 2nd Edition. A report by the LASA Education, Training and Ethics Section.(M. Jennings and M. Berdoy eds.). https://www.lasa.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/LASA_supervision_and_competence_2016.pdf . 2016. (Accessed 28 March 2020).
35. Bentham. J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation . 1780 and first published in 1789.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Las/os autoras/es conservan los derechos de autoría de los artículos y autorizan a la Universitat de Barcelona a publicarlos en su Revista de Bioética y Derecho y a incluirlos en los servicios de indexación y abstracts, bases de datos académicas y repositorios en los que participa la revista.
Los trabajos publicados en la Revista de Bioética y Derecho están bajo la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento - NoComercial - SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (by-nc-nd 4.0), que permite compartir la obra con terceros, siempre que éstos reconozcan su autoría, su publicación inicial en esta revista y las condiciones de la licencia. No se permite un uso comercial de la obra original ni la generación de obras derivadas.
