La integridad científica en la formación universitaria en el contexto de la inteligencia artificial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2024.2%20Extraordinario.49189Palabras clave:
Integridad científica, integridad académica, ética científica, inteligencia artificial, investigación científica, educación superiorResumen
El presente artículo examina el uso e impacto de la inteligencia artificial en la educación superior, centrándose en los desafíos que esta tecnología plantea para la integridad científica, la educación profesional y la formación de nuevos investigadores. Las herramientas de inteligencia artificial ofrecen tanto enormes oportunidades como retos significativos, los cuales aún no han sido completamente asimilados por las instituciones de educación superior. La naturaleza evolutiva de estas tecnologías genera constantes interrogantes sobre su uso legítimo y equitativo en los ámbitos científico y académico. A través de una exhaustiva revisión sistemática de la literatura, los autores identifican y analizan los principales temas de discusión en este campo. El estudio proporciona conclusiones fundamentales, reconociendo la necesidad de una adaptación continua frente a los rápidos avances tecnológicos.
Citas
Abbas, N., & al. (2023). Role of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Enhancing Students' Educational Performance at Higher Levels. Journal of Artificial Intelligence,Machine Learning and Neural Network , 3(05), 36–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jaimlnn.35.36.49.
Adamsbaum, C. & Samama, M. (2024), Scientific integrity: What do we need to know and pass on?, Journal d'imagerie diagnostique et interventionnelle, 7(2), 101 - 104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jidi.2024.01.002
Agudelo-Grajales, & al. (2023). Recomendaciones para configurar un paradigma de integridad científica desde la ética de la virtud en educación superior. Revista Colombiana de Bioética, 18(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18270/rcb.v18i2.4406
Ali, M., & Abdel-Haq, M. (2021). Bibliographical Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Learning in Higher Education. 36-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4846-2.CH003.
Ananías, R. (2014). Integridad científica: principio que inspira el prestigio. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología, 16(4), 393-394. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-221X2014000400001
Andrés Aucejo, E. (2017). La evaluación de la actividad investigadora en ciencias jurídicas: hacia un impacto nacional y un impacto internacional en las ciencias jurídicas. Revista de Educación y Derecho, (16). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1344/REYD2017.16.23737
Andrés Aucejo, E. (2009). Proyecto de innovación docente sobre acción tutorial integral aplicada a los estudios de grado, másters oficiales de postgrado y programas nacionales e internacionales de movilidad. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 7(2):1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2009.6242
Ayuso, C. (2022), La integridad científica: perspectiva de un investigador. Disponible en: https://repisalud.isciii.es/bitstream/handle/20.500.12105/15311/Mesa2_JAEIB_IntegridadCientificaPerspectivaInvestigador_2022.pdf?sequence=1
Bahammam. D. (2023). Balancing Innovation and Integrity: The Role of AI in Research and Scientific Writing. Nat Sci Sleep. V. 15, 1153-1156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S455765.
Banks, G., & al. (2019). Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 257-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10869-018-9547-8
Blau, W. & al. (2024), Protecting scientific integrity in an age of generative AI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024 May 28;121(22). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2407886121
Bolaño-García, M., & Duarte-Acosta, N. (2024). Una revisión sistemática del uso de la inteligencia artificial en la educación. Revista Colombiana de Cirugía, 39(1), 51-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30944/20117582.2365
Brumback, R.A. (2012), Journal combat: Initiating a publication, competing for visibility, and assuring ethical behavior, Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine, 17, 4-8, DOI: 10.1177/2156587211428322
Carobene A. & al. (2023). Rising adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: evaluating the role, risks, and ethical implications in paper drafting and review process, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), V. 61 Issue 12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1136
Castelló-Sirvent, F., Roger-Monzó, V., & Gouveia-Rodrigues, R. (2024). Quo Vadis, University? A Roadmap for AI and Ethics in Higher Education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning. V. 22, I. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.6.3267.
Chávez, C.M., & al. (2023). Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Promoting Academic Integrity in Education: A Systematic review. Journal of Namibian Studies, 33 S1, 71–85
Chen, L., & al. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-5278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Cippitani, R. (2023), La dimensión jurídica del Espacio Europeo de la Investigación, CNR Editions, Roma, ISBN printed edition: 978-88-8080-590-8; ISBN-e: 978-88-8080-591-5
Cornejo- Plaza, I., (2023). “Libertad de investigación: un derecho distinto de la libertad de expresión y subordinado a la integridad científica”. En (Coods.) Martínez Gómez, Jesús, Cornejo Plaza, María Isabel y Fernández Pichardo, Gema. Bioética, violencia y conflictos internacionales. México, Tirant Lo Blanch, pp. 225-241.
Cornejo- Plaza, I., & Cippitani, R. (2023a). Consideraciones éticas y jurídicas de la Inteligencia Artificial en Educación Superior: desafíos y perspectivas. Revista de Educación y Derecho, (28). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2023.28.43935
Cornejo- Plaza, I., & Cippitani, R. (2023 b). La libertad de Investigación en el proceso de propuestas de nueva constitución en Chile. Estudios Constitucionales, 21 (especial), 88-119. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002023000300088
Cotton, D., & al. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.
Crawford, J. & al. (2008), The publishing game: reflections of an editorial team. Lab Invest 88, 1258–1263 (2008). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.2008.113.
Currie, G.M. (2023), Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy?, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 53(5), 719-730, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008
Davies, S. (2019) An ethics of the system: talking to scientists about research integrity. Sci Eng Ethics 25(4):1235–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0064-y
De Lecuona, I. (2020), “La integridad científica en las instituciones de educación superior en el siglo XXI”, Ilemata, Revista Internacional de Éticas Aplicadas, Nº31, 95-107
Dempere, J., & al. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936
Donnell, F., Porter, M., & Fitzgerald, S. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning. V. 8 Nº1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22554/szwjfy54.
Elgueta Rosas, M.F., & Palma-González, E. (2022). Desarrollo sostenible, cuarta revolución industrial y desafíos de la Educación Jurídica para el siglo XXI. Revista de Educación y Derecho, (25). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2022.25.39419
Edwards, M. & Roy, S. (2017). Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science. Jan 2017.51-61. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0223
Fanelli, D. (2009) How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE 4(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
Fang, F. & al., (2012), Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications, PNAS, 109 (2012), 16751-16752, DOI: 10.1073/iti4212109
Fardim, K. & al. (2023), Scientific writing with artificial intelligence: key considerations and alerts, Brazilian Dental Science, 26 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3988
Fernández-Samos-Gutiérrez, R. (2023). La inteligencia artificial en la redacción y autoría de publicaciones científicas. Angiología, 75(5), 281-283. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/angiologia.00512
Foucault, Michel. 2010. ¿Qué es un autor? . Córdoba: Ediciones Literales.
Flanagin A. & al. (2023), “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge. JAMA. 2023;329(8):637–639. DOI: doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1344.
Font Ribas, A. & All. (2012). Las competencias genéricas en el Grado de Derecho y su evaluación. Revista de Educación y Derecho, (6), 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/re&d.v0i06.5162
Font Ribas, A. & All. (2021). Hacia un entorno de aprendizaje personal a través del portafolios digital y sus aplicaciones en un entorno profesionalizador en derecho. Revista Pedagogía Universitaria y Didáctica del Derecho. Revista de Educación y Derecho, (8), 2, 39-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5885.2021.65858
Fontanilla, N. & Mercado, Z. (2021) "Competencias investigativas procedimentales que promueven los docentes universitarios en su acción didáctica", Educere, 25(81), 567-577
Forsberg, Em. & al. (2018) Working with research integrity-guidance for research performing organisations: the Bonn PRINTEGER statement. Sci Eng Ethics 24(4):1023–1034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4
Fowler, D. (2023). AI in Higher Education: Academic Integrity, Harmony of Insights, and Recommendations. Journal of Ethics in Higher Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26034/fr.jehe.2023.4657.
Frías, M. & al. (2017), "Las habilidades cognitivas en el profesional de la Información desde la perspectiva de proyectos y asociaciones internacionales", Investigación bibliotecológica, 31 (71), enero/abril, México. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2017.71.57816
Gawlik-Kobylińska, M. (2024). Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Scientific Collaboration: Insights from Students and Educational Implications. Education Sciences. 14(10), 1132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101132.
George, B., & Wooden, O. (2023). Managing the Strategic Transformation of Higher Education through Artificial Intelligence. Administrative Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13090196.
Gilat, R. & Cole, B.J. (2023), How will artificial intelligence affect scientific writing, reviewing and editing? The future is here, Arthroscopy, Vol 39 Issue 5 pp 1119-1120 (letter to the editor). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.01.014
Global Research Council (2013). Statement on principles on research integrity. Disponible en: https://globalresearchcouncil.org/
Gonzalez, L., & Marín, A. (2023). Advances and ethical challenges in the integration of AI in scientific production. Journal of Scientific Metrics and Evaluation. V.1 Nº1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.69821/josme.v1ii.2.
Hamed Golzar, N & al. (2024), A framework for assessing a country’s scientific productivity based on published articles by scientists affiliated with that country, Information Discovery and Delivery, 52 (1), 23-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-08-2021-0082
Hassani, H., & Silva, E. S. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in data science: how ai-assisted conversational interfaces are revolutionising the field. Big data and cognitive computing, 7(2), 62; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020062
Hernández, J.J. (2023). Contenidos de las publicaciones: calidad, colaboración e integridad científica (Editorial). Jurídicas CUC, 19(1), 1–8.
Hirsch, A. (2022), La integridad científica en la formación académica". Gaceta Conbioetica, Año XI Nº 45 Julio - septiembre 2022, 15-20
Holmes, W., & al. (2021). Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 504 - 526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Hooda, M. & al. (2022), Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722
Hosseini M. & al. (2023), Using AI to write scholarly publications. Account Res. 2023;1-9. DOI:10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535
Howard, J. (2019), Artificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 62 (11), November, 917-926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23037
Hua, J. (2023). Beyond Exams: Investigating AI Tool Impact on Student Attitudes, Ethical Awareness, and Academic Dishonesty in Online College Assessments. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/353030.
Hutson, C.M. (2022), AI help you to write your next paper?, Nature, 2022 Nov; 611(7934):192-193. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-03479-w.
ICAI (2021), International Center for Academy Integrity, The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity, Third Edition (2021). Disponible en: https://academicintegrity.org/images/pdfs/20019_ICAI-Fundamental-Values_R12.pdf].
Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2(8):e124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Imran, M. & Almusharraf, N. (2023), Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature, Contemporary educational technology, 2023-10, 15(4), DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/13605
Kasneci, E., & al. (2023) ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education, in Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 103, April, 102274, DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Katsamakas, E., Pavlov, O., & Saklad, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions. ArXiv, abs/2402.08143. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.08143.
Khlaif, Z. & al. (2023). The Potential and Concerns of Using AI in Scientific Research: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation. JMIR Medical Education, 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/47049.
Khatri, B., & Karki, P. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Higher Education: Growing Academic Integrity and Ethical Concerns. Nepalese Journal of Development and Rural Studies. V. 20 N1. DOI: 1 https://doi.org/10.3126/njdrs.v20i01.64134.
Kleebayoon, A. & Wiwanitkit, V. (2023). "ChatGPT, critical thing and ethical practice", Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 61 (11), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0495
Köbis, L., & Mehner, C. (2021). Ethical Questions Raised by AI-Supported Mentoring in Higher Education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.624050.
Koçak, Z. (2024). Publication ethics in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 39(33). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249.
Kretser, A., & al. (2019), Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium. Sci Eng Ethics 25, 327–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3
Kuleto, V., & al. (2021). Exploring Opportunities and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Higher Education Institutions. Sustainability, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810424
Kwasnicka, D. & al. (2021). Promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology: results of the Synergy Expert Meeting of the European health psychology society, Health Psychology Review, 15:3, 333-349, DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1844037
Laine, H. (2018). Open science and codes of conduct on research integrity. Informaatiotutkimus. 37(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23978/INF.77414
Labib K, & al. (2021 a). Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/p38nw
Labib, K. & al. (2021 b). Important topics for fostering research integrity by research performing and research funding organizations: a delphi consensus study. Sci Eng Ethics 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00322-9
Lerouge, I. & Hol, A. (2020) Towards a research integrity culture at universities: From recommendations to implementation. League of European Universities, 2020. Disponible en: https://www.leru.org/publications.
Limongi, R. (2024). The use of artificial intelligence in scientific research with integrity and ethics. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, V. 16 Nº1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24023/futurejournal/2175-5825/2024.v16i1.845.
Lindemann, T., & Häberlein, L. (2023). Contours of a research ethics and integrity perspective on open science. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1052353
López, J.F. & al. (2022), La inteligencia artificial en las publicaciones científicas (Editorial), Cirugía de Mano y Microcirugía, Disponible en: https://latinjournal.org/index.php/rcmm/article/download/1653/1342
Lövestam, G., & al. (2024). Fostering scientific integrity and research ethics in a science-for-policy research organisation. Research Ethics, 0(0). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241243001
Lüscher, T. & al. (2020), Scientific integrity: what a journal can and cannot do, European Heart Journal, 41 (48), December, 4552-4555, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa963
Mahama, I., & al. (2023). ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Threat to Human Creativity and Academic Integrity? An Exploratory Study. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), 3(3), 228-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v3i3.1005
Maral, M. (2024), A Bibliometric Analysis on Academic Integrity. J Acad Ethics (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09519-6
Marušić, A. & al. (2016) Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):MR000038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2
McGuinness, N. (2023), Retracted Article: A threat to scientific integrity. Br Dent J, 235, 162–163 (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6165-2
MacFarlane, B & al. (2014), Academic integrity: a review of the literature, Studies in Higher Education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2014-02, Vol. 39 (2), 339-358. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709495
McGowan, F. & al. (2023), Maintaining scientific integrity and high research standards against the backdrop of rising artificial intelligence use across fields. Journal of Medical Artificial Intelligence, 6 (24). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jmai-23-6
Mejlgaard, N, & al. (2020) Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk. Nature 586(7829):358–360
Moher, D., & al. (2019). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
Moya, B., & Eaton, S. (2023). Examining Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Use with Integrity from a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Lens. RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v29i2.29295.
Munafo, M. (2016). Open Science and Research Reproducibility, Ecancer Medical Science, 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56.
Nature (2023), Editorial, Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature. 2023; 613(7945):612. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
Nelson, A. & Lubchenco, J. (2022), Editorial: Strengthening scientific integrity, Science, 11 Jan 2022, Vol 375, Issue 6578, DOI: 10.1126/SCIENCE.ABO0036
Neves, J., & al. (2024). Technological innovations in education: a scoping review on the impact of AI on academic integrity. Observatório de Economía Latinoamericana. V. 22, Nº7, 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55905/oelv22n7-153.
Nykonenko, A. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on modern education: prospects and challenges. Artificial Intelligence, Scientific Journal. 28(2):10-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/jai2023.02.010.
Oduoye, M., Javed, B., Gupta, N., & Sih, C. (2023). Algorithmic bias and research integrity; the role of nonhuman authors in shaping scientific knowledge with respect to artificial intelligence: a perspective. International Journal of Surgery, 109(10), 2987-2990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000552.
Okulicz-Kozaryn, W. (2023). Is artificial intelligence a threat to the quality of higher educational services?, Scientific journal of Khortytsia National Academy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51706/2707-3076-2023-8-16.
Pabon, G.C. (2021). Competencias cognitivas, procedimentales y actitudinales en ciencias naturales de los estudiantes de grado 4to y 5to de primaria. Mérito - Revista de Educación, 3(8), 115-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33996/merito.v3i8.594
Patrão Neves, M.C. (2018). On (scientific) integrity: conceptual clarification. Med Health Care and Philos, 21, 181–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9796-8
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Piller, C. & Servick, K. (2020), Two elite medical journals retract coronavirus papers over data integrity questions, ScienceInsider, DOI: 10.1126/science.abd1697
Pisica, A., & al. (2023). Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Pros and Cons from the Perspectives of Academics. Societies , 13, 118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13050118
Pols, J. & al. (2024). Achieving good science: The integrity of scientific institutions. Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 24-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2024.170103
Polonevych, O. (2024). Use of artificial intelligence in the organization of scientific research. Connectivity. 169(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31673/2412-9070.2024.030306.
Ravn, T. & Sørensen, M. (2021) Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research. Sci Eng Ethics, 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00310-z
Resnik, DB & Shamoo, AE (2017) Reproducibility and research integrity. Account Res 24(2):116–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1257387
Rincón, M. & al. (2021), "Diagnóstico de necesidades de formación en ética de la investigación, bioética e integridad científica en Colombia", Minciencias, Bogotá
Rivera, H. (2023), La integridad científica ante los plagios fabricados con el ChatGPT. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Nov 6;61(6): 857-862. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10064458
Roberts, LL. & al. (2020) Integrating the history of science into broader discussions of research integrity and fraud. Hist Sci 58(4): 354–368, DOI: 10.1177/0073275320952268
Roy, S. & Edwards, M.A. (2023), NSF Fellows’ perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academia. Sci Rep 13, 5701 (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32445-3
Saltelli, A. (2023), Teaching scientific research integrity: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, (julio) 1-14, DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2237949
Saúde, S., Barros, J., & Almeida, I. (2024). Impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Research Trends and Students’ Perceptions. Social Sciences, 13(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13080410.
Ščepanović, R & al. (2021) Practices for research integrity promotion in research performing organisations and research funding organisations: a scoping review. Sci Eng Ethics 27(4); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1
Shi, J., & Xuwei, Z. (2023). Integration of AI with Higher Education Innovation: Reforming Future Educational Directions. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/sr231023183401
Sira, N., & al. (2024). Teaching Scientific Integrity in Academia: What and How Students Want to Learn?. J Acad Ethics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09527-6
Slimi, Z. (2021). The impact of AI implementation in higher education on educational process future: A systematic review (PrePrint). WWW: https://www.researchsquare.com/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1081043/v1
Soehartono, A.M. & al. (2022) Essential signals in publication trends and collaboration patterns in global Research Integrity and Research Ethics. Scientometrics 127, 7487–7497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04400-y
Solanes-Puchol, A. & al. (2022). Competencias transversales en la universidad: validación de un cuestionario para su evaluación. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 16(2), e1538. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2022.1538
Sørensen, M.P., & al. (2021). Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on? Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8, 198 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00874-y
Sponholz, G (2000), Teaching scientific integrity and research ethics. Forensic Science International, 113(1–3), 511-514, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00267-X
Steneck, N.H. (2006), Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Sci Eng Ethics 12(1):53–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022268
Stokel-Walker C. (2023), ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature. 2023;613(7945):620-621. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
Schuyt, K. (2019). Scientific Integrity : the rules of academic research. Leiden University Press (LUP). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/79152
Suazo, I. (2023). Inteligencia artificial en investigación científica. SciComm Report, 3(1), 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32457/scr.v3i1.2149
Sullivan, I., & al. (2019). Open and Reproducible Research on Open Science Framework. Current Protocols, Essential Laboratory Techniques, 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpet.32.
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?. ArXiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
Sutrop, M. & al. (2020). Research Ethics Codes and Guidelines. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_2
Tambuskar, S. (2022). Challenges and Benefits of 7 ways Artificial Intelligence in Education Sector. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, V. 3 e3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.education.v3i00.3.
Thorp, HH. (2023), ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 2023;379(6630):313. DOI:10.1126/science.adg7879
Tonko, P. (2017), Time to codify scientific integrity, Science, 23 Jun 2017, Vol 356, Issue 6344, 1241-1242, DOI: 10.1126/science.aan6163
Tzoneva, I. (2023). Benefits and challenges in using ai-powered educational tools. Education and New Developments, V. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v2end079.
UK Parliament (2019), Science and Technology Committee, Concordat to Support Research Integrity. En: https://www.ukri.org; https://publications.parliament.uk/
Ventura, M., & Oliveira, S. (2022). Integrity and ethics in research and science publication. Cadernos de saude publica, 38(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00283521
Walters, W.H. & Wilder, E.I. (2023), Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Sci Rep, 13, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5
Wong, S. & al. (2016) Integrity in and Beyond Contemporary Higher Education: What Does it Mean to University Students?, Front. Psychol. 7:1094. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01094
Xie, Y., & al. (2023). AI meets AI: Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity - A Survey on Mitigating AI-Assisted Cheating in Computing Education. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3585059.3611449
Yeagle, P. (2018), Editorial, Watch dogs: Scientific integrity at Science Advances, Science Advances, Oct 2018, Vol 4, Issue 10, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav570
Zawacki-Richter, O. & al. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zekaj, R. (2023). AI Language Models as Educational Allies: Enhancing Instructional Support in Higher Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.8.7
Zielinski, C. & al. (2023); WAME Board. Chatbots, ChatGPT, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on ChatGPT and chatbots in relation to scholarly publications. January 20, 2023. Disponible en: https://wame.org/page3.php?id=106
Zompero, A., & al. (2022). Competencias científicas en los currículos de Ciencias Naturales: estudio comparativo entre Brasil, Chile y Colombia. Praxis & Saber, 13(34), e13401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.v13.n34.2022.13401
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Patricio Masbernat, A.C., Isabel Cornejo- Plaza, Roberto Cippitani
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
El/la autor/a que publica en esta revista está de acuerdo con los términos siguientes:
- El/la autor/a conserva los derechos de autoría y otorga a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de la obra.
- Los textos se difundirán con la licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite compartir la obra con terceros, siempre que éstos reconozcan su autoría, su publicación inicial en esta revista y las condiciones de la licencia.
Síguenos en LinkedIn
Síguenos en Facebook 
Síguenos en Twitter
