Technology adoption in Malaysian schools: An analysis of national ICT in education policy initiatives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.172-194Keywords:
Technology, Education policy, Discourse analysisAbstract
Educational change, particularly change involving the adoption of educational innovations, is a complex process. In Malaysia, the significant role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in promoting digital education is reflected in the national ICT in education policy. Nevertheless, studies in the Malaysian educational context have shown that the policy implementation resulted in varying degrees of success. Through a discourse analysis approach, this paper aims to examine the evaluation studies on large scale initiatives introduced to digitize the Malaysian education system, from the Smart Schools programme to the incorporation of the Frog Virtual Learning Environment in classroom. The rationale behind these top-down initiatives and how they affected the stakeholders at the micro level, namely, teachers and students, are reviewed and analysed. The analysis informs our understanding of the factors that contribute to the successful and unsuccessful implementation of these initiatives and guide the planning of future policies.
References
Awang, H., Aji, Z. M., Yaakob, M. F. M., Osman, W. R. S., Mukminin, A., & Habibi, A. (2018). Teachers’ intention to continue using Virtual Learning Environment (VLE): Malaysian context. JOTSE, 8(4), 439-452.
Chan, F. M. (2002, October). ICT in Malaysian schools: Policy and strategies. In a Workshop on the Promotion of ICT in Education to Narrow the Digital Divide (pp. 15-22).
Cheok, M. L., & Wong, S. L. (2016). Frog virtual learning environment for malaysian schools: Exploring teachers’ experience. In ICT in education in global context (pp. 201-209). Springer, Singapore.
Coppola, E. M. (2004). Powering up: Learning to teach well with technology. Teachers College Press.
Eickelmann, B., & Vennemann, M. (2017). Teachers ‘attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 733-761.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational technology research and development, 47(4), 47-61.
Eteokleous, N. (2008). Evaluating computer technology integration in a centralized school system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 669-686.
Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge.
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry (Vol. 9). John Wiley & Sons.
Hamilton, J., & Feldman, J. (2014). Planning a program evaluation: Matching methodology to program status. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 249-256). Springer, New York, NY.
Hawkey, R. (2006). Impact theory and practice. Studies in language testing, 24, 1-135.
Hew, T. S., & Kadir, S. L. S. A. (2016). Behavioural intention in cloud-based VLE: An extension to Channel Expansion Theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 9-20.
Howley, A., Wood, L., & Hough, B. (2011). Rural elementary school teachers' technology integration. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26.
Ibrahim, M. S. (2009). An Evaluation of the Smart School Teacher Training Programme and its Impact on Integrating Technology into Teaching and Learning Processes in Malaysia. SOSIOHUMANIKA, 2(2).
Kale, U., & Goh, D. (2014). Teaching style, ICT experience and teachers’ attitudes toward teaching with Web 2.0. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 41-60.
Kaur, T., & Hussein, N. (2015). Teachers’ readiness to utilize Frog VLE: A case study of a Malaysian secondary school. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 20-29.
Kormos, E. M. (2018). The unseen digital divide: Urban, suburban, and rural teacher use and perceptions of web-based classroom technologies. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 19-31.
Lam, Y. (2000). Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56. 389-410.
Miles, M. A. (1994). Miles and Huberman (1994)-Chapter 4. pdf. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 50-72.
Moses, P., Wong, S. L., Bakar, K. A., & Mahmud, R. (2013). Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use: antecedents of attitude towards laptop use among science and mathematics teachers in Malaysia. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(3), 293-299.
Multimedia Development Corporation (2005). Malaysian Smartschool Roadmap 2005-2020:An Educational Odyssey. Putrajaya. Government of Malaysia.
Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. Journal of information technology for teacher education, 9(3), 319-342.
Ong, E. T., & Ruthven, K. (2010). The distinctiveness and effectiveness of science teaching in the Malaysian ‘Smart school’. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(1), 25-41.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Frels, R. K. (2014). A framework for using discourse analysis for the review of the literature in counseling research. Counseling outcome research and evaluation, 5(1), 52-63.
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & education, 55(3), 1321-1335.
Ozga, J. (2000). 13 Education: New Labour, New Teachers. New managerialism, new welfare?, 222.
Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & education, 37(2), 163-178.
Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts–a review of literature. Education and information technologies, 23(3), 1005-1021.
Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction (Vol. 50). Sage Publications.
Plomp, T., Anderson, R. E., Law, N., & Quale, A. (Eds.). (2009). CrossNational Information and Communication Technology Policies and Practices in Education:(Revised Second Edition). IAP.
Raman, A., & Rathakrishnan, M. (2018). FROG VLE: Teachers’ technology acceptance using utaut model. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 529-538.
Ramasamy, R. M. M., & Aziz, A. B. A. (2018). Peer Assessment in Writing Using Frog VLE in a Secondary School ESL Classroom. Creative Education, 9(14), 2265.
Samuel, R., & Bakar, Z. (2006). The utilization and integration of ICT tools in promoting English language teaching and learning: Reflections from English option teachers in Kuala Langat District, Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 2(2), 4-14.
Snoeyink, R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2001). Thrust into technology: How veteran teachers respond. Journal of educational technology systems, 30(1), 85-111.
Thah, S. S. (2014). Leveraging virtual learning environment to scale up quality teaching and learning in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Collaborative education Journal, 10(1), 1-17.
Taylor, S., Risv I, F., Lingard, B. & Henry, M. (1997) Educational Policy and the Politics of Change (London, Routledge)
Tolani-Brown, N., McCormac, M., & Zimmermann, R. (2011). An analysis of the research and impact of ICT in education in developing country contexts. In ICTs and Sustainable Solutions for the Digital Divide: Theory and Perspectives (pp. 218-242). IGI Global.
Lim, W. K., Said, M. N. H. M., Atan, N. A., & Ler, S. Y. (2018). Students’ Perception towards the Use of Frog VLE Based on Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal (ITLJ), 2(1), 51-57.
Wood, L., & Howley, A. (2012). Dividing at an early age: the hidden digital divide in Ohio elementary schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(1), 20-39.
Yim, J. S. C., Moses, P., & Azalea, A. (2018). Effects of psychological ownership on teachers’ beliefs about a cloud-based virtual learning environment. Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, 13(1), 13.
Younie, S. (2006). Implementing government policy on ICT in education: Lessons learnt. Education and Information technologies, 11(3-4), 385-400.
Yunus, N. K. Y., Kamarudin, M. H., Zachariah, T. Z., & Zabit, M. N. M. (2016). Service Quality, Organisational Culture, and Technology Acceptance Towards 1BestariNet Application In Northern Malaysia. International Business Education Journal (IBEJ), 9(1), 16-26.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers college record, 104(3), 482-515
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- The texts published in Digital Education Review, DER, are under a license Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4,0 Spain, of Creative Commons. All the conditions of use in: Creative Commons,
- In order to mention the works, you must give credit to the authors and to this Journal.
- Digital Education Review, DER, does not accept any responsibility for the points of view and statements made by the authors in their work.
