Distance Educational Relationship and Senses of Belonging: The voices of students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2022.42.101-117Keywords:
Digital education, Distance education, Relationality, Belonging, StudentsAbstract
In a viral society in which the social being claims the ability to maintain distance and the socially desirable representation of the body, in particular the face, claims its concealment, the distance educational relationship represents a critical area that deserves to be highlighted in the research agendas. This study aims to explore the sense of belonging of 144 students who attend a distance learning university. For this purpose, an open-ended questionnaire was applied, previously disclosed in closed groups on social networks. The students' sense of belonging was analysed through the types of connections they maintain with the campus, course, peers and teachers. The analysis of the narratives expresses a great diversity, density of experiences and expectations in the connections and senses of belonging. Attributing great importance to teachers in the appropriation of knowledge, it is essentially with their peers - other students - that the connections and sense of belonging acquire greater expression.
References
AERA (2011). Code of Ethics American Educational Research Association. Educ. Res. 40(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11410403
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. University of Texas Press.
Barnett, R. (2012). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642841
Bayne, S. (2017). From Anthropocentric Humanism to Critical Posthumanism in Digital Education. In P.Jandric´ (Ed.), Learning in the Age of Digital Reason, 197-216. Sense Publishers. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-077-6_9
Bayne, S., Gallagher, M.S., & Lamb, J. (2014). Being "at" University: The Social Topologies of Distance Students. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 67(5), 569-583. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9662-4
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2021). On the verge of a new renaissance: Care and empathy-oriented, human-centered pandemic pedagogy. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 1-7. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5070496
Castañeda, L. (2019). Debates regarding Technology and Education: contemporary pathways and pending conversations. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.23020
Castañeda, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(22). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y
Colás, P. (1992). La Metodologia Cualitativa. In P. Colás, L. Buendia (Eds.), Investigación Educativa, 249-290. Alphar.
Creswell, J. (2014). Investigação Qualitativa e Projeto de Pesquisa. Escolhendo entre cinco abordagens. Ed. Penso.
Crooks, D. (2001). The importance of symbolic interaction in grounded theory research on women’s health. Health Care for Women International, 22, 11-27. http://doi.org/0.1080/073993301300003054
Feenberg, A. (2017a). Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Harvard University Press.
Feenberg, A. (2017b). The Bursting Boiler of Digital Education: Critical Pedagogy and Philosophy of Technology. In Petar Jandric (Ed.), Learning in the Age of Digital Reason, 132-148. Educational Futures Brill. http://doi.org.10.1007/978-94-6091-734-9_1
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Sociology Press.
Gourlay, L. (2020) Posthumanism and the Digital University. Texts, Bodies and Materialities. Bloomsbury. http://doi.org.10.5040/9781350038202
Gourlay, L. (2022). Presence, Absence, and Alterity: Fire Space and Goffman’s Selves in Postdigital Education. Postdigit Sci Educ 4, 57–69. http://doi.org.10.1007/s42438-021-00265-1
Gourlay, L., Campbell, K, Clark, L, Crisan, C, Katsapi, E, Riding,K., & Warwick, I. (2021). Engagement’ Discourses and the Student Voice: Connectedness, Questioning and Inclusion in Post-Covid Digital Practices. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(15), 1–13. http://doi.org.10.5334/jime.655
Hayes, S. (2021). Postdigital Positionality. Developing Powerful Inclusive Narratives for Learning, Teaching, Research and Policy in Higher Education, 1051–1055. Koninklijke Brill NV. http://doi.org. 10.1080/00131857.2021.2012762
Ingold, T. (1993). The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology, 25(2), 152-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235
Jandric, P. (2017). Learning in the Age of Digital Reason, 211-224. Series Educational Futures. http://doi.org.10.1007/978-94-6351-077-6
Jandric, P. (2020) Postdigital research in the time of COVID-19. Postdigital Science and Education 2(2), 233–238. http://doi.org.10.1007/s42438-020-00113-8
Jandric, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Sarah Hayes, S. (2018) Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893-899, http://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000
Jandric, P., Hayes. D, Truelove, I, et al. (2020) Teaching in the age of COVID-19. Postdigital Science and Education 2(3), 1069–1230. http://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00169-6
Jandric, P., & Ford, D. (2020b) Postdigital ecopedagogies: genealogies, contradictions, and possible futures. Postdigital Science and Education 2, 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00207-3.
Jandric, P., & Hayes, S. (2021). Postdigital education in a biotech future. Policy Futures in Education, Special Issue: Educational Futures, 2. http://doi.org/ 10.1177/14782103211049915
Jonet, A., & Erstad, O. (2018). From learning contexts to learning lives: Studying learning (dis)continuities from the perspective of the learners. Digital Education Review, 33. http://doi.org/10.1344/der.2018.33.1-25
Law, J., & Mol, A. (2001). Situating technoscience: An inquiry into specialities, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(5), 609 – 621. https://doi.org/10.1068/d243t
Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology, Social Studies in Science, 24(4), 641-671. http://doi.org/10.1177/030631279402400402
Saavedra, J., Arias-Sanchez, S., & De la Mata, M. (2021). Social Positioning Analysis as a Qualitative Construction in People Diagnosed with Severe Mental Illnesses. Qualitative Health Research, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211050377
Sancho, J. (2020). Digital technology as trigger for learning: promises and realities. Digital Education, 2. Digital learning: distraction or default for the future, 195-207. http://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd edition). Sage Publications
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Digital Education Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- The texts published in Digital Education Review, DER, are under a license Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4,0 Spain, of Creative Commons. All the conditions of use in: Creative Commons,
- In order to mention the works, you must give credit to the authors and to this Journal.
- Digital Education Review, DER, does not accept any responsibility for the points of view and statements made by the authors in their work.
