The ARTificial Revolution: Challenges for Redefining Art Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2024.45.84-90Keywords:
Generative artificial intelligence, image, artistic education, educationAbstract
After years of development in the background, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has burst onto the global stage thanks to open tools for generating textual, visual, auditory, and audiovisual content. In this emerging context, AI is not only emerging as a technological phenomenon but also as a catalyst for innovation in the artistic and educational fields. Although we are only at the dawn, AI is rapidly evolving and leading us towards a revolution, opening a new field of possibilities in creative domains that will transform current aesthetic, procedural, and authorial conceptions. Its potential as a creative tool is currently limited to being a support that facilitates obtaining results of great formal quality and style quickly, but without human intervention based on clear objectives, it becomes an empty generator. Artistic Education must embrace this technology not as an intruder or rival, but as a tool to be known and integrated as another means of creation, developing skills that allow students not only to use these tools effectively but also to reflect on their implications in society and culture. Promoting a conscious, responsible, safe, and ethical use that ensures a critical stance towards generative AI. Understand that it is not a creative tool. It is for creators.
References
Aggarwal, K., Mijwil, M. M., Al-Mistarehi, A. H., Alomari, S., Gök, M., Alaabdin, A. M. Z., & Abdulrhman, S. H. (2022). Has the future start-ed? The current growth of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathe-matics, 3(1), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2022.01.01.013
Akinwalere, S. N., & Ivanov, V. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Border Crossing, 12(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.33182/bc.v12i1.2015
Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the crea-tive industries: a review. Artificial intelligence review, 1-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7
Badea, C., & Gilpin, L. (2022). Establishing meta-decision-making for AI: an ontology of relevance, representation and reasoning. arXiv pre-print arXiv:2210.00608.
Bakpayev, M., Baek, T. H., van Esch, P., & Yoon, S. (2022). Program-matic creative: AI can think but it cannot feel. Australasian Market-ing Journal, 30(1), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.04.002
Bernaschina, D. (2023). Artes mediales e inteligencia artificial: la crisis de la ética y la precariedad laboral en el campo artístico-digital. Revista Avenir, 7(1), 10-25.
Benjamin, W. (2018) La obra de arte en la era de su reproductibilidad técnica. Taurus.
Carceller, A. T. (2015). Forma y Color: La grisalla en la pintura; aproxi-mación a un procedimiento inadvertido. BRAC: Barcelona, Re-search, Art Creation, 3(2), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.17583/brac.2015.1350
Choi, S. K. (2022). The AI Laocoön: Art and the Artificial Imagination or, Survival Aesthetics in the Anthropocene. Leonardo, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02307
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2011). Fluir: Una psicología de la felicidad. Kai-rós.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisci-plinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. In-ternational Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Gangadharbatla, H. (2022). The role of AI attribution knowledge in the evaluation of artwork. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 40(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237421994697
Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036
Haraway, D. J. (2016). The cyborg manifesto. In Haraway, D. J. Manifest-ly Haraway (pp. 117-158). University of Minnesota Press.
Hill-Yardin, E. L., Hutchinson, M. R., Laycock, R., & Spencer, S. J. (2023). A Chat (GPT) about the future of scientific publishing. Brain, behavior, and immunity, S0889-1591. 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.02.022
Hunde, B. R., & Woldeyohannes, A. D. (2022). Future prospects of computer-aided design (CAD)–A review from the perspective of arti-ficial intelligence (AI), extended reality, and 3D printing. Results in Engineering, 100478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100478
Jaskot, P. B. (2019). Digital art history as the social history of art: To-wards the disciplinary relevance of digital methods. Visual Re-sources, 35(1-2), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2019.1553651
Jovanovic, M., & Campbell, M. (2022). Generative artificial intelligence: Trends and prospects. Computer, 55(10), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2022.3192720
Khalil, M., & Er, E. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of plagiarism detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04335.
Leach, N. (2022). From Deconstruction to Artificial Intelligence: The New Theoretical Paradigm. In The Contested Territory of Architectural Theory (pp. 229-241). Routledge.
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learn-ing. nature, 521(7553), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
Lee, H. K. (2022). Rethinking creativity: creative industries, AI and everyday creativity. Media, Culture & Society, 44(3), 601-612.
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?. Library hi tech news, 40(3), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221077009
Matas, C. R. (2018). El impacto de la inteligencia artificial y de la robóti-ca en el empleo público. GIGAPP Estudios Working Papers, 5(98-110), 401-421.
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Bio-physics, 5(4), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259
Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine Learning. McGraw Hill.
Radhakrishnan, A. M. (2023). Is Midjourney-ai a new anti-hero of archi-tectural imagery and creativity?. GSJ, 11(1).
Ruiz, N. B. (2022). El arte reproductivo de Joan Rabascall en el ‘tiempo de la contestación. Archivo Español de Arte, 95(377), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.3989/aearte.2022.05
Schellekens, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the re-imagination of inventive step. J. Intell. Prop. Info. Tech. & Elec. Com. L., 13, 89.
Song, B., & Koo, A. (2022). Paradigm shift: Artificial intelligence, con-temporary art, and implications for gifted arts education. Journal of Gifted Education in Arts, 8, 5-38. https://doi.org/10.22752/KRIGA.2022.08.001
Tello, A. M. (2015). El arte y la subversión del archivo. Aisthesis, (58), 125-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-71812015000200007
Torres-Carceller, A. (2022). Mentiras reveladoras: el fake como práctica artística contra la defactualización. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review/Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual, 9(Monográfico), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v9.3560
Vartiainen, H., & Tedre, M. (2024). How Text-to-Image Generative AI is Transforming Mediated Action. IEEE Computer Graphics and Appli-cations. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2024.3355808
Wellner, G. (2022). Digital Imagination, Fantasy, AI Art. Foundations of Science, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09747-0
Xiao, Y., Chatterjee, S., & Gehringer, E. (2022, November). A New Era of Plagiarism the Danger of Cheating Using AI. In 2022 20th Interna-tional Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Educa-tion and Training (ITHET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Zhuk, A. (2023). Navigating the legal landscape of AI copyright: a com-parative analysis of EU, US, and Chinese approaches. AI Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00299-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrés Torres Carceller
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- The texts published in Digital Education Review, DER, are under a license Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4,0 Spain, of Creative Commons. All the conditions of use in: Creative Commons,
- In order to mention the works, you must give credit to the authors and to this Journal.
- Digital Education Review, DER, does not accept any responsibility for the points of view and statements made by the authors in their work.
