Re-imagining Digital Technology in Education through Critical and Neo-materialist Insights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2021.40.154-171Paraules clau:
Critical theory, feminist new materialism, digital technologies, education, imaginariesResum
Technological determinism, techno-solutionism and instrumental perspectives on technologies have populated educational research literature in the last decades, and even more since the pandemic crisis has started. This essay offers a critique about simplistic explanations of technology adoption in pedagogy by using insights from critical philosophy of technology and feminist new materialism. It rejects the assumption of teachers’ resistance to change and proposes a frame to expand future imaginaries of education. In this sense, critical studies provide a focus on human activity as interconnected with social and situated knowledges/practices. The emphasis is on recursive relations that allow educational researchers and practitioners to take into account the considerable complexity of digital technologies pedagogical adoption. On the other hand, feminist new materialism brings about a new focus on relational ontology, which adds to the critical theoretical framework the agentic element. By overcoming a binary way of seeing technologies through utopias and dystopias, new materialist studies focus on ethics and responsibility. We argue that we need both a critical and a neo-materialist view, in order to adopt technologies in education in meaningful, productive and creative ways. Building on small narratives and possible utopias can take us to re-design and re-interprete the future of educational technologies.
Referències
Acosta Corporán, R., Martín-García, A. V. & Hernández Martín, A. (2019). Uso de las Metodologías de Aprendizaje Colaborativo con TIC: Un análisis desde las creencias del profesorado. Digital Education Review, 35, 309-323.
Aldunate, R.; Nussbaum, M. (2013). Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (3), 519-524. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.017
Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M., Pomerantz, J., Seilhamer, R. & Weber, N. (2019) EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE.
Alirezabeigi, S.; Masschelein, J.; Decuypere, M. (2020) Investigating digital doings through breakdowns: a sociomaterial ethnography of a Bring Your Own Device school. Learning, Media and Technology, 45 (2), 193-207. Doi: 10.1080/17439884.2020.1727501
Andrade, M.; Pischetola, M. (2016). O discurso de ódio nas mídias sociais: a diferença como letramento midiático e informacional na aprendizagem. Revista e-curriculum, 14 (4), 1377– 1394.
Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., and Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT Impact Report: A Review of Studies of ICT Impact on Schools in Europe. European Schoolnet (online), Brussels, Belgium.
Balsamo, A. (2011). Designing culture. The technological imagination at work. Durha, NC: Duke press.
Bannell, R. (2019). Out of our Minds? Learning beyond the brain. In: Leporace, C., Bannell, R., Rodrigues, E., Santos, E. et al. (Eds). A Mente Humana para Além do Cérebro. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2012). Intra-actions: An interview with Karen Barad by Adam Kleinman. Mousse, 34, 76–81.
Bardzell, S. (2018). Utopias of Participation: Feminism, Design, and the Futures. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25 (1), Article 6.
Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., and Antanitis, J. (2012). Critical design and critical theory: The challenge of designing for provocation. Proc. of DIS'12. ACM Press.
Bardzell, J. & Bardzell, S. (2013). What is “Critical” about Critical Design? Proceedings of the CHI 2013: Changing Perspectives, Paris, France.
Barnett, R.; Bengsten, S. (2017). Confronting the Dark Side of Higher Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51 (1), 114-131.
BECTA - British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. Retrieved December 13, 2019, from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1603/1/becta_2004_barrierstouptake_litrev.pdf
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Revised edition. Oxford: Rowman.
Biesta, G. (2010). Why “What Works” Still Won’t Work: From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education’, Stud. Philos. Educ., 29 (5), 491–503. DOI: 10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x.
Biesta, G. & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Stud. Educ. Adults, 39 (2), 132–149. DOI: 10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545.
Biesta, G., Priestley M., & Robinson S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624-640, DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325.
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science & technology education, 5 (3), 235-245.
Braga, A. & Logan, R. (2017). The Emperor of Strong AI Has No Clothes: Limits to Artificial Intelligence. Information, 8, 156-177. DOI: 10.3390/info8040156
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
Brown, M., McCormack, M., Reeves, R., Brooks, D., & Grajek, S., (2020) 2020 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report, Teaching and Learning Edition. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE.
Bødker, S. (2003). A for alternatives. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 15 (2003), 87–89.
Buckingham, D. (2020). Epilogue: Rethinking digital literacy: Media education in the age of digital capitalism. Digital Education Review, 37 (monographic), 230-239.
Carey, J. W. (1990). Technology as a totem for culture: And a defense of the oral tradition. American Journalism, 7, 242-251.
Caena, F. and Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DIGCOMPEDU), European Journal of Education, 54 (3), 356-369.
Çoban, B. (ed.) (2016). Social Media and Social Movements: The Transformation of Communication Patterns. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2011). Human development or human enhancement? A methodological reflection on capabilities and the evaluation of information technologies. Ethics Inf Technol, 13, 81–92. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-010-9231-9
Cooper, S. (2002). Technoculture and Critical Theory. In the service of the machine? London and New York: Routledge.
Covaci, A., Zou, L., Tal, I., Mntean, G., Ghinea, G. (2018). Is Multimedia Multisensorial? - A Review of Mulsemedia Systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 51 (5), Article 91.
Creanor, L. & Walker, S. (2012). Learning Technology in Context: A Case for the Sociotechnical Interaction Framework as an Analytical Lens for Networked Learning Research. In: L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, and D. McConnell, (eds.). Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning, New York, NY: Springer, 173–187.
Cuban L. (2002). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Dafoe, A. (2015). On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40 (6), 1047-1076.
Dale R., Robertson S. & Shortis T. (2004) You can’t not go with the technological flow, can you? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 456–470.
Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning Professional Ways of Being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41 (1), 34-45.
Davis, F. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions, and behavioural impacts. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 38, 475–487.
Davis, B. & Sumara, D. (2008). Complexity as a theory of education. Curriculum Inquiry, 5 (2), 33–44.
Drent, M. & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51 (1), 187-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.001
Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of Technology: an Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Embretson, S. E. (2004). Measuring Human Intelligence with Artificial Intelligence: Adaptive item generation. In: R. J. Sternberg & J. Pretz (eds.). Cognition and intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 251-267.
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Feenberg, A. (2003). Modernity Theory and Technology Studies: Reflections on Bridging the Gap. In: Misa, T., Brey, P. & Feenberg, A. (Eds.). Modernity and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Feenberg, A. (2004). Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of History. New York and London: Routledge.
Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Feenberg, A. (2019). The internet as network, world, co-construction, and mode of governance. The Information Society, 35 (4), 229–243.
Fenwick T.; Edwards, R. (2014). Networks of knowledge, matters of learning, and criticality in higher education. Higher Education, 67 (1), 35-50.
Ferdig, R.E., Baumgartner, E., Hartshorne, R., Kaplan-Rakowski, R. & Mouza, C. (Eds). (2020). Teaching, Technology, and Teacher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stories from the Field. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 15, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216903/.
Ferguson, R., Coughlan, T., Egelandsdal, K., Gaved, M., Herodotou, C., Hillaire, G., Jones, D., Jowers, I., Kukulska-Hulme, A., McAndrew, P., Misiejuk, K., Ness, I. J., Rienties, B., Scanlon, E., Sharples, M., Wasson, B., Weller, M. and Whitelock, D. (2019). Innovating Pedagogy 2019: Open University Innovation Report 7. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Ferrando, F. (2020). Posthuman Feminist Ethics: Unveiling Ontological Radical Healing. In: Thomsen, M. R., Wamberg, J. (eds.), Bloomsbury Handbook of Posthumanism, Bloomsbury: London et al.
Ferreira, G. & Lemgruber, M. (2018). Metáforas Fundamentais da Tecnologia Educacional. Educação em Foco, 23 (1), 15-38. DOI: 10.22195/2447-524620182320012
Ferreira, G. M.; Rosado A., Carvalho J. (eds.) (2017). Education and Technology: Critical Approaches. Rio de Janeiro: UNESA.
Frau-Meigs, D., O’Neill, B., Soriani, A, Tomé, V. (2017). Digital Citizenship Education, vol. 1. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Garcia, A. (Ed.). (2014). Teaching in the connected learning classroom. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Hub
Gomes, G.; Torrens, E. W.; Cunha, P. R. (2012). Motivação e Resistência ao Uso da Tecnologia da Informação: Um Estudo Entre Professores. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 13 (2), 301-324.
Goodwin, A. Lin; Low, Ee Ling; Ng, Pak Tee ;Yeung, A. S. ; Cai, Li (2015). Enhancing Playful Teachers’ Perception of the Importance of ICT Use in the Classroom: The Role of Risk Taking as a Mediator. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (4), 1–19.
Grimaldi, E. & Ball, S. (2019): The blended learner: digitalisation and regulated freedom - neoliberalism in the classroom, Journal of Education Policy, DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2019.1704066
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575–599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Haraway, D. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In: Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. London: Duke University Press.
Hasse, C. (2019). Posthuman learning: AI from novice to expert? AI & SOCIETY, 34, 355–364. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0854-4.
Hayes, S. (2018). Invisible labour: Do we need to reoccupy student engagement policy? Learning and Teaching 11 (1), 19–34.
Heinsfeld, B. D.; Pischetola, M. (2019). Discourse on technologies in public policies on education. Educação & Pesquisa, 45. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-4634201945205167
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review.
Howard, S.; Gigliotti, A. (2016). Having a go: Looking at teachers’ experience of risk-taking in technology integration. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1351–1366. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-015-9386-4.
Hitty, U. (Ed.) (2002). State‐of‐Art of Enterprise Education in Europe – Results from the Entredu project. Leonardo da Vinci – programme of the European Commission, Turku.
Hultin, L. (2019). On becoming a sociomaterial researcher: Exploring epistemological practices grounded in a relational, performative ontology. Information and Organization 29, 91–104.
Ito, M., Gutierrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Watkins, C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
Jandrić and Hayes (2020), Postdigital We-Learn. Studies in Philosophy and Education https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09711-2
Jamieson-Proctor, R. M.; Burnett, P. C.; Finger, G.& Watson, G. (2006) ICT integration and teachers’ confidence in using ICT for teaching and learning in Queensland state schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22 (4), 511-530.
Klumbyté, G., Draude, C. & Britton, L. (2019). Re-Imagining HCI: New Materialist Philosophy and Figurations as Tool for Design. Workshop “Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Exploring the Intersection of Philosophy and HCI”, ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK.
Kocsev, M., Hansen, N., Hollow, D. & Pischetola, M. (2009). Innovative Learning in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: ECBP working paper.
Korte, W. B. & Hϋsing, T. (2007). Benchmarking access and use of ICT in European schools 2006: Results from Head Teacher and A Classroom Teacher Surveys in 27 European countries. eLearning Papers, 2 (1), 1-6.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Beirne, E., Conole, G., Costello, E., Coughlan, T., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Gaved, M., Herodotou, C., Holmes, W., Mac Lochlainn, C., Nic Giollamhichil, M., Rienties, B., Sargent, J., Scanlon, E., Sharples, M. and Whitelock, D. (2020). Innovating Pedagogy 2020: Open University Innovation Report 8. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Kurzweil, R. (2006). Reinventing Humanity: The Future of Machine-Human Intelligence. The Futurist, 40 (2), 39-46.
Latour, B. (1994). On Technical Mediation. Common Knowledge, 3 (2), 29-64.
Lawrence, J. E. & Tar, U. A. (2018) Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process, Educational Media International, 55 (1), 79-105, DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712
Lenz Taguchi, H. (2011). Investigating Learning, Participation and Becoming in Early Childhood Practices with a Relational Materialist Approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1 (1). DOI 10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.36
Lin, L., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W., & Shen, S. (2020). From knowledge and skills to digital works: An application of design thinking in the information technology course, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100646.
Lindtner, S., Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J. (2016). Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making: HCI After Technosolutionism. Proceedings of the CHI Conference 2016, San Jose, CA, USA.
Mangiatordi, A., Pischetola, M. (2010). Sustainable Innovation Strategies in Education: OLPC case studies in Ethiopia and Uruguay. In: Lytras M. D. et al. (eds). Organizational, Business, and Technological Aspects of the Knowledge Society, Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 94-104.
Mansell, R. (2017). Imaginaries of the Digital: Ambiguity, Power and the Question of Agency. Communiquer. Revue de Communication Sociale et Publique, 20, 40–48. DOI: 10.4000/communiquer.2261
McCarthy, J. (1959). Programs with Common Sense. Mechanisation of Thought Processes, Proceedings of the Symposium of the National Physics Laboratory, 77-84, London UK.
Milan, S. (2020). Techno-solutionism and the standard human in the making of the COVID-19 pandemic. Big Data & Society, 1–7 DOI: 10.1177/2053951720966781
Miranda, L. V. T., Pischetola, M. (2020). Teaching as the emergent event of an ecological process: Complexity and choices in one-to-one programmes. Explorations in Media Ecology, 19 (4), 503–519. DOI: 10.1386/eme_00065_1
Mirra, N.; Morrell, E.; & Filipiak, D. (2018). From Digital Consumption to Digital Invention: Toward a New Critical Theory and Practice of Multiliteracies,Theory Into Practice, 57 (1), 12-19, DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2017.1390336
Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
Morozov, E. (2014). The rise of data and the death of politics. The Guardian, 20 Jul. Retrieved November 24, 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/20/rise-of-data-death-of-politics-evgeny-morozov-algorithmic-regulation.
Mosco, V., & Wasko, J. (Eds.). (1988). The political economy of information. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Murris, K. (2018). Posthuman Child and the Diffractive Teacher: Decolonizing the Nature/Culture Binary. In: A. Cutter-Mackenzie et al. (eds.), Research Handbook on Childhoodnature, Springer International Handbooks of Education, DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_7-2
Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27 (5), 373–384. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x
Ong, A. & Collier, S. J. (eds.) (2004). Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as An- thropological Problems. Wiley-Blackwell.
Peck, J. & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing Space. Antipode, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00247
Peixoto, J. (2015). Relações entre sujeitos sociais e objetos técnicos: uma reflexão necessária para investigar os processos educativos mediados por tecnologias. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 29 (61). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782015206103.
Peters, M.A., P. Jandrić, and S. Hayes (2019). The curious promise of educationalising technological unemployment: What can places of learning really do about the future of work? Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (3): 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376.
Philip, T. M. & Garcia, A. (2013). The Importance of Still Teaching the iGeneration: New Technologies and the Centrality of Pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 83 (2), 300-319.
Pischetola, M. (2014). Teaching with Laptops: A Critical Assessment of One-to-one Technologies. In: M. Stocchetti (ed.) Media and Education in the Digital Age. Concepts, Assessments, Subversions, pp. 203-214. Frankurt: Peter Lang.
Pischetola, M. (2011). Educazione e divario digitale. Idee per il capacity building. Milano: Unicopli.
Pischetola, M. (2019). Teachers and technologies in Brazilian schools: a study from the perspective of media ecology. Italian Journal of Sociology ofEducation, 11 (2), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2019-2-20.
Pischetola, M. (2020). Exploring the relationship between in-service teachers’ beliefs and technology adoption in Brazilian primary schools. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, DOI 10.1007/s10798-020-09610-0
Pischetola, M. & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2020). Enactivism and Digital Learning Platforms. Proceedings of the Networked Learning Conference.
Pischetola, M., Heinsfeld, B. D. (2018). Technologies and teacher’s motivational style: A research study in Brazilian public schools. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies 17, 163-177. DOI 10.1386/cjmc.9.2.253_1
Pischetola, M.; & Miranda, L. V. T. (2019). A sala de aula como ecossistema. Tecnologias, complexidade e novos olhares para a educação. Rio de Janeiro: Editora PUC-Rio.
Pischetola, M.; Miranda, L.V.T.; Albuquerque, P. (2020). Sociomaterialidade e digitalização da educação: reformulando a prática e a pesquisa em uma perspectiva pós-humana. In: Bannell, R., I., Mizrahi, M., Ferreira, G. M. Deseducando a educação: mentes, materialidades e metáforas. Rio de Janeiro: Editora PUC-Rio.
Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: First Vintage Books Edition.
Priestley, M. (2011). Whatever happened to curriculum theory? Critical realism and curriculum change’, Pedagogy Culture & Society, 19 (2), 221–237. DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2011.582258.
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things, Social Studies of Science, 41 (1), 85-106. DOI: 10.1177/0306312710380301
Ransom, T. G. & Gallagher, S. (2020). Institutions and other things: critical hermeneutics, postphenomenology and material engagement theory. AI & Society, 1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-00987-z
Sancho-Gil, J. M., Rivera-Vargas, P. & Miño-Puigcercós, R. (2019): Moving beyond the predictable failure of Ed-Tech initiatives. Learning, Media and Technology, 45 (1), 61-75. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2019.1666873
Schoepp, K. (2005). Barriers to technology integration in a technology-rich environment. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 2 (1), 1–24.
Seikkula-Leino, J.; Ruskovaara, El; Ikavalko, M.; Mattila, J.; Rytkola, T. (2010). Promoting entrepreneurship education: the role of the teacher? Education + Training, 52 (2), 117-127. DOI: 10.1108/00400911011027716
Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26 (1), 65-73, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x
Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: critical questions. In: Ferreira, G. M.; Rosado A., Carvalho J. (eds.). Education and Technology: Critical Approaches. Rio de Janeiro: UNESA.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should Robots Replace Teachers?: AI and the Future of Education. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Eynon, R., Ferreira, G., Knox, J., Macgilchrist, F. & Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2019): What’s next for Ed-Tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s, Learning, Media and Technology, DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2020.1694945
Selwyn, N., (2020). Digital Education in the Aftermath of COVID-19: Critical Concerns and Hopes. In: Selwyn, N., Macgilchrist, F., Williamson, B. Digital Education after COVID-19. TECHLASH – issue #0
Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Eynon, R., Ferreira, G., Knox, J., Macgilchrist, F. & Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2020) What’s next for Ed-Tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s. Learning, Media and Technology, 45 (1), 1-6, DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2020.1694945
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.Y., Huang, Y. M., & Liu, T. Y. (2017). Facilitating application of language skills in authentic environments with a mobile learning system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34 (1), 42-52. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12212
Silva, E., Loureiro, M. J. & Pischetola, M. (2019) Competências digitais de professores do estado do Paraná (Brasil). Eduser-Revista de Educação, 11 (1), 61-75.
Singh, T. K. R. & Chan, S. (2014). Teacher Readiness on ICT Integration in Teaching-Learning: a Malaysian Case Study. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 4 (7), 874-885.
Shadiev, R. & Yang, M. (2020). Review of Studies on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning and Teaching. Sustainability, 12(2), 524. DOI: 10.3390/su12020524
Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 217‐26.
Smith, B. (2019). The Promise of Artificial Intelligence: Reckoning and Judgment. Boston: MIT Press.
Smith, M. & Marx, L. (1994). Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press.
Somekh B. (2008) Factors Affecting Teachers’ Pedagogical Adoption of ICT. In: Voogt J., Knezek G. (eds) International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. Springer International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, vol 20. Springer, Boston, MA. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_27
Swartz, J. (2016). Communication and curation: Embodied meaning and praxis (Doctoral dis- sertation). Eugene: University of Oregon.
Taylor, C. A. (2019), Diffracting the Curriculum: Putting “New” Material Feminism to Work to Reconfigure Knowledge-Making Practices in Undergraduate Higher Education", Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, 5, 37-52. DOI: 10.1108/S2056-375220190000005004
Tearle, P. & Golder, G. (2008). The use of ICT in the teaching and learning of physical education in compulsory education: how do we prepare the workforce of the future?, European Journal of Teacher Education, 31 (1), 55-72, DOI: 10.1080/02619760701845016
Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs H., Curcher, M. (2020). Post-Covid-19 Education and Education Technology ‘Solutionism’: a Seller’s Market, Postdigital Science and Education, 2 (3), 863–878. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-020-00164-x.
Thiele, K. (2014). Ethos of Diffraction: New Paradigms for a (Post)humanist Ethics, Parallax, 20 (3), 202-216, DOI: 10.1080/13534645.2014.927627
Tondeur, J. (2020). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of teacher education. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_111-1.
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gate- keepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Educational Research Association, 50 (3), 1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12748.
Watson, G. (2006). Technology professional development: Long-term effects on teacher self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14 (1), 151–166.
Williamson, B. (2019). New power networks in educational technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 44 (4), 395-398, DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2019.1672724
Williamson, B. (2020). Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e)valuation of higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 62 (1), 50-66, DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2020.1737556
Williamson, B; Eynon, R. & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45 (2), 107-114, DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
Williamson, B., Bayne, S. & Shay, S. (2020b). The datafication of teaching in Higher Education: critical issues and perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 25 (4), 351-365.
Williamson, B. & Hogan, A. (2020). Commercialisation and privatization in/of education in the context of Covid-19. London: Education International.
Descàrregues
Publicades
Número
Secció
Llicència
Drets d'autor (c) 2021 Digital Education Review
Aquesta obra està sota una llicència internacional Creative Commons Reconeixement-NoComercial-SenseObraDerivada 4.0.
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- The texts published in Digital Education Review, DER, are under a license Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4,0 Spain, of Creative Commons. All the conditions of use in: Creative Commons,
- In order to mention the works, you must give credit to the authors and to this Journal.
- Digital Education Review, DER, does not accept any responsibility for the points of view and statements made by the authors in their work.
