Neuroeducar en la divergencia a través del análisis genérico del perfil neurocognitivo: ejemplificación a través del Síndrome de Turner
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/joned.v2i1.34532Keywords:
neuroeducación, diversidad, neuroatípico, cromosomosopatíasAbstract
El siguiente trabajo tiene como objetivo mostrar la importancia de la neuroeducación divergente y evidenciar que no es estrictamente necesario tener un conocimiento altamente especializado para llevar a cabo cambios funcionales y relevantes en el aula. Con esa finalidad, se propone un esquema de trabajo simple y estructurado para que su repetibilidad sea fácilmente transferible a cualquier etapa educativa y a cualquier condición divergente. El modelo aquí propuesto consiste en realizar un mapa conceptual con la ayuda de buscadores científicos con la intención de dar herramientas a los educadores para que planifiquen y fundamenten sus prácticas diarias en la evidencia científica, enmarcada siempre dentro de un contexto pedagógico de reflexión. También pretende evidenciar que el conocimiento científico puede y debe ser transferible a cualquier ámbito social con los ajustes y adaptaciones pertinentes, sin implicar esa transferencia, necesariamente, una pérdida de rigor intelectual. A lo largo de este escrito se considera que dar herramientas a los educadores, para comprender el perfil neurocognitivo de los alumnos neurodivergentes que pueden llegar a encontrarse en el aula, no sólo es positivo para el trabajo de las dificultades de aprendizaje específicas del alumnado, sino que abre un abanico de posibilidades para el crecimiento personal y profesional de dichos educadores.
La neuroeducación lleva evidenciando desde su creación como disciplina, que enseñar a las personas cómo funciona su propio cerebro genera cambios: en su forma de entender el mundo, en su proceso de aprendizaje y en su forma de educar. Por ello, la educación en las particularidades del cerebro neuroatípico puede generar un cambio de paradigma en el contexto educativo, ya que educar en base a la forma en la que aprende un cerebro diferente puede condicionar por un lado su aprendizaje y por otro puede paliar los problemas de adaptación de lo diferente a un mundo tan estandarizado como el nuestro.
References
Howard-Jones P, Varma S, Ansari D, Butterworth B, De Smedt B, Goswami U, Laurillard D, Thomas MS. The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers. Psychol. Rev. 2016; 123(5), 620-627. doi: 10.1037/rev0000036
Ansari D, Smedt B, Grabner RH. Neuroeducation – A Critical Overview of An Emerging Field. Neuroethics. 2012; 5(2), 105-117. doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3
Hayes AM, Bulat J. Disabilities Inclusive Education Systems and Policies Guide for Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Research Triangle Park (NC): RTI Press; 2017. doi: 10.3768/rtipress.2017.op.0043.1707
Sybert VP, McCauley E. Turner's Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004; 351, 1227-1238. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra030360
Bonnard Å, Bark R, Hederstierna C. Clinical update on sensorineural hearing loss in Turner syndrome and the X-chromosome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2019; 181(C), 67-73. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31673
Sagi L, Zuckerman-Levin N, Gawlik A, Ghizzoni L, Buyukgebiz A, Rakover Y, Hochberg Z. (2007). Clinical significance of the parental origin of the X chromosome in Turner syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007; 92(3), 846–852. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0158
Vorsanova SG, Kolotii AD, Kurinnaia OS, Kravets VS, Demidova IA, Soloviev IV, Iourov IY. Turner’s syndrome mosaicism in girls with neurodevelopmental disorders: a cohort study and hypothesis. Mol. Cytogenet. 2021; 14(9). doi: 10.1186/s13039-021-00529-2
Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB, Kutsev SI. Ontogenetic and pathogenetic views on somatic chromosomal mosaicism. Genes (Basel). 2019; 10(5), 379. doi: 10.3390/genes10050379
Casado A. Explorando la discalculia. Trabajo Final de Posgrado «Dificultades de Aprendizaje y Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo» (Curso académico 2019/2020). Inédito; 2020.
Mazzocco MMM, Thompson L, Sudhalter V, Belser RC, Lesniak-Karpiak K, Ross JL. Language use in females with Fragile X or Turner syndrome during brief initial social interactions. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 2006; 27(4), 319-328. doi: 10.1097/00004703-20060 8000-00007
Rovet J. Turner syndrome: a review of genetic and hormonal influences on neuropsychological functioning. Child Neuropsychol. 2004; 10, 262-279. doi: 10.1080/09297040490909297
Mazzocco MMM. Mathematical learning disability in girls with turner syndrome: a challenge to defining MLD and its subtypes. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2009; 15, 35-44. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.50
Wolstencroft J, Skuse D. Social skills and relationships in Turner syndrome. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry. 2019; 32(2), 85-91. doi: 10.1097/YCO.00000 00000 00047 2
Hall SS, Riley MJ, Weston RN, Lepage JF, Hong DS, Jo B, Hallmayer J, Reiss AL. Effects of X Chromosome Monosomy and Genomic Imprinting on Observational Markers of Social Anxiety in Prepubertal Girls with Turner Syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord. 2021. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04896-y
Bruandet M, Molko N, Cohen L, Dehaene S. A cognitive characterization of dyscalculia in Turner syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 2004; 42, 288-298. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.007
Murphy MM, Mazzocco MMM, Gerner G, Henry AE. Mathematics learning disability in girls with Turner syndrome or fragile X syndrome. Brain Cogn. 2006; 61, 195-210. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.12.014
Simon TJ, Takarae Y, De Boer T, McDonald-McGinn DM, Zackai EH, Ross JL. Overlapping numerical cognition impairments in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion or Turner syndromes. Neuropsychologica. 2008; 46, 82-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.016
Li M, Zhao C, Xie S, Liu Z, Zhao Q, Zhang Z, Gong G. Effects of hypogonadism on brain development during adolescence in girls with Turner syndrome. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2019; 40, 4901-4911. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24745
Molko N, Cachia A, Rivière D, Mangin J, Bruandet M, Le Bihan D, Cohen L, Dehaene S. Functional and Structural Alterations of the Intraparietal Sulcus in a Developmental Dyscalculia of Genetic Origin. Neuron. 2003; 40(13), 847-858. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00670-6
Menon V. Arithmetic in the child and adult brain. In: R. Kadosh C, Dowker A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 502-530). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Brankaer C, Ghesquiere P, De Wel A, Swillen A, De Smedt B. Numerical magnitude processing impairments in genetic syndromes: a cross-syndrome comparison of Turner and 22q11.2 deletion syndromes. Dev. Sci. 2017; 20(6), 1-14. doi: 10.1111/desc.12458
Clark C, Klonoff H, Hadyen M. Regional cerebral glucosa metabolism in Turner syndrome. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 1990; 17, 140-144. doi: 10.1017/S0317167100030341
Laumonnier F, Cuthbert PC, Grant SG. The role of neuronal complexes in human X-linked brain diseases. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007; 80, 205-220. doi: 10.1086/511441
Swingland JT, Durrenberger PF, Reynolds R, Dexter DT, Pombo A, Deprez M, Roncaroli F, Turkheimer FE. Mean Expression of the X-Chromosome is Associated with Neuronal Density. Front. Neurosci. 2012; 6, 161. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00161
Nguyen DK, Disteche CM. High expression of the mammalian X chromosome in brain. Brain Res. 2006; 1126, 46-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.053
Arnold AP. Sex chromosomes and brain gender. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004; 5, 701-708. doi: 10.1038/nrn1494
Haberecht MF, Menon V, Warsofsky IS, White CD, Dyer-Friedman J, Glover GH. Functional neuroanatomy of visuo-spatial working memory in Turner syndrome. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2001; 14(2), 96-107. doi: 10.1002/hbm.1044
Shughrue PJ, Merchenthaler I. Estrogen is more than just a “sex hormone”: Novel sites for estrogen action in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2000; 21(1), 95-101. doi: 10.1006/frne.1999.0190
Reiss A, Eliez S, Schmitt E, Patwardhan A, Haberecht M. Brain imagin in neurogenetic conditions: Realizing the potential of beahvioral neurogenetics research. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2000; 6, 186-197. doi: 10.1002/1098-2779(2000)6:3%3C186::aid-mrdd6%3E3.0.co;2-9
Varma S, McCandliss BD, Schwartz DL. Scientific and Pragmatic Challenges for Bridging Education and Neuroscience. Educ. Res. J. 2008; 37(3), 140-152. doi: 10.3102/0013189X08317687
Cromley J. Learning to think, learning to learn: What the science of thinking and learning has to offer adult education. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy; 2000.
Ehrlich P, Feldman MW. Genes, environments, behaviors. Daedalus. 2007; 136(2), 5-12. doi: 10.1162/daed.2007.136.2.5
Siegel D. The mindful brain: Reflection and attunement in the cultivation of wellbeing. New York: W.W. Norton Company; 2007.
Levine M. A mind at a time. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000.
Thibaudeau E, Cellard C, Turcotte M, Achim AM. Functional Impairments and Theory of Mind Deficits in Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of the Associations, Schizophr. Bull. 2021; sbaa182. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa182
Cole HT. The way we think: A primer of education and psychotherapy by reeducation. Kessinger Publishing, LLC; 2006.
Gilbert C. Sigman M. Brain states: Top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron. 2007; 54(5), 677-696. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.019
Bados A. Terapia cognitiva de Beck. En: Labrador FJ (Coor.). Técnicas de modificación de conducta. (pp. 517- 533). Madrid: Pirámide; 2008.
Neville HJ, Stevens C, Pakulak E, Bell TA, Fanning J, Klein S, Isbell E. Family-based training program improves brain function, cognition, and behavior in lower socioeconomic status preschoolers. PNAS. 2013; 110(29), 12138-12143. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304437110
Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Mirrors in the mind. In: John Wiley & Sons, The Jossey-Bass reader on the brain and learning, (pp. 12-19). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
Cohen L, Dehaene S, Chochon F, Lehericy S, Naccache L. Language and calculation within the parietal lobe: A combined cognitive, anatomical and fMRI study. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38, 1426-1440. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00038-5
Boden M. The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. New York: Routledge; 2004.
Abraham A, Windmann S. Creative cognition: The diverse operations and the prospect of applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Methods. 2007; 42(1), 38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.12.007
Salmon AK. Engaging Young Children in Thinking Routines. Child. Educ. 2010; 86(3), 132-137. doi: 10.1080/00094056.2010.10523133
Moser J, Schroder HS, Heeter C, Moran TP, Lee YH. Mind your errors: evidence for a neural mechanism linking growth mind-set to adaptive posterror adjustments. Psychol. Sci. 2011; 22(12), 1484-1489. doi: 10.1177/0956797611419520
Sowell E, Peterson BS, Thompson PM, Welcome SE, Henkenius AL, Toga AW. Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat. Neurosci. 2003; 6(3), 309-315. doi: 10.1038/nn1008
Boldrini M, Fulmore CA, Tartt AN, Simeon LR, Pavlova I, Poposka V, Rosoklija GB, Stankov A, Arango V, Dwork AJ, Hen R, Mann JJ. Human Hippocampal Neurogenesis Persists throughout Aging, Cell Stem Cell. 2018; 22(4), 589-599.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.03.015
Goleman D. Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter than IQ (10th ed.). New York: Bantum; 2006.
Stafford-Brizard KB, Cantor P, Rose LT. Building the Bridge Between Science and Practice: Essential Characteristics of a Translational Framework. Mind Brain Educ. 2017; 11(4), 155-165. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12153
Ballarini F, Martínez MC, Díaz M, Moncada D, Viola H. Memory in Elementary School Children Is Improved by an Unrelated Novel Experience. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(6), e66875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066875
Kandel ER. In search of memory: The emergence of a new science of mind. New York: W.W. Norton and Company; 2007.
Rabinovic I, Fullio CL, Schroeder MN, Giurfa M, Ballarini F, Moncada D. Behavioral tagging underlies memory reconsolidation. PNAS. 2020; 117(30), 202009517. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009517117
Schmidt LA. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience: Developmental and clinical perspectives. Brain Cogn. 2007; 65(1), 1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.12.003
Jensen E. Teach the arts for reasons beyond the research. Education Digest. 2002; 67(6), 47.
Peretz I, Zatorre RJ. Brain organization for music processing. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2005; 56(1), 89-114.
Wolf M. Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York: Harper; 2007.
Sigman M. Bridging psychology and mathematics: can the brain understand the brain? PLoS Biol. 2004; 2(9), E297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020297
Neale D, Clackson K, Georgieva S, Dedetas H, Scarpate M, Wass S, Leong V. Toward a Neuroscientific Understanding of Play: A Dimensional Coding Framework for Analyzing Infant-Adult Play Patterns. Front. Psychol. 2018; 9, 273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00273
Rivera SM, Reiss AL, Eckert MA, Menon V. Developmental Changes in Mental Arithmetic: Evidence for Increased Functional Specialization in the Left Inferior Parietal Cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 2005; 15(11), 1779-1790. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi055
Carew TJ, Magsamen SH. Neuroscience and Education: An Ideal Partnership for Producing Evidence-Based Solutions to Guide 21(st) Century Learning. Neuron. 2010; 67(5), 685-688. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.028
Flanagan E, Lamport D, Brennan L, Burnet P, Calabrese V, Cunnane SC, de Wilde MC, Dye L, Farrimond JA, Emerson Lombardo N, Hartmann T, Hartung T, Kalliomäki M, Kuhnle GG, La Fata G, Sala-Vila A, Samieri C, Smith AD, Spencer JPE, Thuret S, Tuohy K, Turroni S, Vanden Berghe W, Verkuijl M, Verzijden K, Yannakoulia M, Geurts L, Vauzour D. Nutrition and the ageing brain: Moving towards clinical applications. Ageing Res Rev. 2020; 62, 101079. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101079
Baena-Extremera A, Ruiz-Montero PJ, Hortigüela-Alcalá D. Neuroeducation, Motivation, and Physical Activity in Students of Physical Education. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021; 18(5), 2622. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052622
Toboso M, Ferreira MAV, Díaz E, Fernández-Cid M, Villa N, Gómez de Esteban, C. Sobre la educación inclusiva en España: políticas y prácticas. Intersticios: Revista Sociológica de Pensamiento Crítico. 2012; 6, 279-295
Feiler JB, Stabio ME. Three Pillars of Educational Neuroscience from Three Decades of Literature. Trends Neurosci. Educ. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2018.11.001
Farah MJ, Heberlein AS. Personhood and Neuroscience: Naturalizing or Nihilating?. Am. J. Bioeth. 2007; 7(1), 37-48. doi: 10.1080/15265160601064199
Piette C, Touboul J, Venance L. Engrams of Fast Learning. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020; 14, 575915. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.575915
Horvath S, Garagnani P, Bacalini MG, Pirazzini C, Salvioli S, Gentilini D, Di Blasio AM, Giuliani C, Tung S, Vinters HV, Franceschi C. Accelerated epigenetic aging in Down syndrome. Aging Cell. 2015; 14(3), 491‐495. doi: 10.1111/acel.12325
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Aroa Rodríguez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication
b. Texts will be published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License that allows others to share the work, provided they include an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship, its initial publication in this journal and the terms of the license, and not for commercial use.
