On the naming of innovation districts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/jesb2022.2.j113キーワード:
innovation districts, naming, branding, triple helix, complex organizations要旨
Name plays a fundamental role in defining and differentiating a company within a category. In this paper we identify how the leaders of 7 innovation districts (22@Barcelona, Ann Arbor Spark, EECi, Porto Digital, Ruta N – Medellín, SK-Skolkovo and TusPark) understand the construction of the names of their innovation districts. We take an inductive approach utilizing two types of data: exploring the innovation district directors' understanding through direct semi-structured interviews and analyzing secondary data consisting of website and brochures. We show how innovation district leaders use more than one classification name for their organization and that these names either tend towards a more strategic or institutional posture. We contribute by extending existing naming theory to include innovation districts, a complex organization composed by actors of the Triple Helix. We also contribute by providing managerial guidance to assist in understanding the importance of the role of their organization's name in long-term positioning.
Downloads
References
Baumeister, Roy F., and Mark R. Leary. 1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117 (3): 497–529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
Belenzon, Sharon, and AK Chatterji. 2014. “Eponymous Entrepreneurs.” Working Paper 107 (6): 1638–55. doi: 10.1257/aer.20141524.
Brewer, Marilynn B. 1993. “Social Identity, Distinctiveness, and In-Group Homogeneity.” Social Cognition 11(1): 150–64. doi: 10.1521/soco.1993.11.1.150.
Champenois, Claire, and Henry Etzkowitz. 2018. “From Boundary Line to Boundary Space: The Creation of Hybrid Organizations as a Triple Helix Micro-Foundation.” Technovation 76–77 (November 2014): 28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2017.11.002.
Chan, Chien Sheng Richard, Haemin Dennis Park, and Pankaj Patel. 2018. “The Effect of Company Name Fluency on Venture Investment Decisions and IPO Underpricing.” Venture Capital 20 (1): 1–26. doi: 10.1080/13691066.2017.1334369.
Chiranjeev, Kohli, and Suri Rajneesh. 2000. “Brand Names That Work: A Study of The Effectiveness of Different Types of Brand Names.” Marketing Management Journal 10. 112-120.
Engel, Yuval, Ruben van Werven, and Annelice Keizer. 2020. “How Novice and Experienced Entrepreneurs Name New Ventures.” Journal of Small Business Management 60 (4): 828–858. doi: 10.1080/00472778.2020.1738820.
Etzkowitz, Henry. 2003. “Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.” Social Science Information 42 (3): 293–337. doi: 10.1177/05390184030423002.
Granqvist, Nina, Stine Grodal, and Jennifer L. Woolley. 2013. “Hedging Your Bets: Explaining Executives’ Market Labeling Strategies in Nanotechnology.” Organization Science 24 (2): 395–413. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0748.
Katz, Bruce, and Julie Wagner. 2014. “The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America.” Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program. https://c24215cec6c97b637db6-9c0895f07c3474f6636f95b6bf3db172.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/content/metro-innovation-districts/~/media/programs/metro/images/innovation/innovationdistricts1.pdf.
Kohli, Chiranjeev, and Douglas W. Labahn,. 1995. “Creating Effective Brand Names: A Study of the Naming Process.” ISBM Report 12-1995, University Park: Institute for the Study of Business Markets, The Pennsylvania State University.
Kotler, Philip, and Gary Armstrong. 2014. Principles of Marketing. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited. 15th ed.
Lima, João Cardim Ferreira, Ana Lúcia Vitale Torkomian, Susana Carla Farias Pereira, Pedro Carlos Oprime, and Luciana Harumi Hashiba. 2021. “Socioeconomic impacts of university–industry collaborations–a systematic review and conceptual model.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7(2): 137. doi: 10.3390/joitmc7020137.
Lockwood, Christi, Simona Giorgi, and Mary Ann Glynn. 2019. “‘How to Do Things With Words’: Mechanisms Bridging Language and Action in Management Research.” Journal of Management 45 (1): 7–34. doi: 10.1177/0149206318777599.
Lopez, Shane J., and C. R. Snyder. 2002. “Uniqueness Seeking.” In The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, (2 Ed.), edited by Shane J. López and C.R. Snyder, 395–410.Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.001.0001.
Muzellec, Laurent. 2006. “What Is in a Name Change? Re-Joycing Corporate Names to Create Corporate Brands.” Corporate Reputation Review 8 (4): 305–16. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540257.
Muzellec, Laurent, Manus Doogan, and Mary Lambkin. 2003. “Corporate Rebranding – An Exploratory Review.” Irish Marketing Review 16 (2): 31–40.
Navis, Chad, and Mary Ann Glynn. 2010. “How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990-2005.” Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (3): 439–71. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.439.
Piqué, Josep Miquel, Francesc Miralles, and Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent. 2019. “Areas of Innovation in Cities: The Evolution of 22@Barcelona.” International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development 10 (1): 3–25. doi: 10.1504/IJKBD.2019.098227.
Salvador, Elisa. 2011. “Are Science Parks and Incubators Good ‘Brand Names’ for Spin-Offs? The Case Study of Turin.” Journal of Technology Transfer 36 (2): 203–32. doi: 10.1007/s10961-010-9152-0.
Schmeltz, Line, and Anna Karina Kjeldsen. 2016. “Naming as Strategic Communication: Understanding Corporate Name Change through an Integrative Framework Encompassing Branding, Identity and Institutional Theory.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 10 (4): 309–31. doi: 10.1080/1553118X.2016.1179194.
Sokolova, Tatiana. 2012. “Examination of Trade Marks, Company Names and Trade Names as the Means of Individualisation in Russia: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the Problem.” Onoma 47: 263–79. doi: 10.2143/ONO.47.0.3085149.
Thomas, David R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–46. doi: 10.1177/1098214005283748.
Vignoles, Vivian L., Xenia Chryssochoou, and Glynis M Breakwell. 2000. “The Distinctiveness Principle: Identity, Meaning, and the Bounds of Cultural Relativity.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 4 (4): 337–54. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_4.
WAINOVA. 2021. “World Alliance for Innovation.” Accessed August 22. https://www.wainova.org/.
Yigitcanlar, Tan, Mirko Guaralda, Manuela Taboada, and Surabhi Pancholi. 2016. “Place Making for Knowledge Generation and Innovation: Planning and Branding Brisbane’s Knowledge Community Precincts. Journal of Urban Technology.” Journal of Urban Technology 23(1): 115-146.
Zhang, Yuehua. 2005. “The Science Park Phenomenon: Development, Evolution and Typology.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 5 (1–2): 138–54. doi: 10.1504/ijeim.2005.006341.
Downloads
出版済
How to Cite
巻号
セクション
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
