Contributions to the biophilosophical foundations of brain death criterion: an approach from anthropological realism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2024.62.43872Keywords:
brain death, organism as a whole, brain as a whole, death determination, philosophical realism, death criterionAbstract
This article analyzes from a biophilosophical point of view whether it is advisable to adjust the current brain death criteria, according to recent discoveries about brain function. The appropriate foundation for a death criterion is recognizing that a human being is more than his or her physical aspect, within which the brain plays a decisive role. Current neurology states that the brain functions globally. Thus, the irreversible loss of integrated brain activity indicates the end of the irreplaceable function performed by the brain to sustain the unity of the organism. Consequently, the function cessation of the brain-as-a-whole is an adequate adjustment of the brain death criterion. To be recognized as a legitimate criterion from a philosophical point of view and to provide a better framework for the development of laws, the death criterion must presuppose a comprehensive anthropological vision that considers all dimensions of the human being.
References
A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. (1968). JAMA, 205(6), 337–340. doi:10.1001/jama.1968.03140320031009.
Accad, M. (2015). Of Wholes and Parts: A Thomistic Refutation of “Brain Death.” Linacre Quarterly, 82: 217–34. https://doi.org/10.1179/2050854915Y.0000000004.
Aquinas, T. (1225-1274). Scriptum Super Libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi Episcopi Parisiensis. In Mandonnet, P. and Moos, M. (Ed.) (1929). Lethielleux. (Original work published ca. 1252).
Bennett, M. & Hacker, P. (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Blackwell.
Bernat J. L. (1998). A Defense of the Whole-brain Concept of Death. The Hastings Center Report, 28(2), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3527567.
______ (2014). Whither Brain Death? The American Journal of Bioethics, 14(8), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.925153.
______ (2018). A Conceptual Justification for Brain Death. The Hastings Center Report, 48 Suppl 4, S19–S21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.946.
______ (2023a). Challenges to Brain Death in Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act: The UDDA Revision Series. Neurology, 101(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207334.
• ______ (2023b). The Brain-as-a-Whole Criterion and the Uniform Determination of Death Act. AJOB neuroscience, 14(3), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2023.2243889.
Bernat, J. L., Culver, C. M., & Gert, B. (1981). On the Definition and Criterion of Death. Annals of Internal Medicine, 94(3), 389–394. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-94-3-389.
Crick, F. (1994). The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul. Touchstone.
Dalle Ave, A. L., & Bernat, J. L. (2020). Inconsistencies Between the Criterion and Tests for Brain Death. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 35(8), 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066618784268.
Eberl, J. (2006). Thomistic Principles and Bioethics. Routledge.
Garcia, O. (1998). A new formulation of death and its relevance to medical law. Medicine and Law, 17(4), 493–501.
García Rodríguez, R.; González Ramírez, V. (2014). Las funciones psíquicas superiores, la corteza cerebral y la cultura. Reflexiones a partir del pensamiento de A. R. Luria. En-claves del Pensamiento, 8(15), 39–62.
Gardiner, D., Greer, D. M., Bernat, J. L., Meade, M. O., Opdam, H., & Schwarz, S. K. W. (2023). Answering global challenges to the determination of death: consensus-building leadership from Canada. Relever les défis mondiaux liés à la détermination du décès: le leadership canadien en matière de création de consensus. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 70(4), 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02423-4.
Loeb, J. (1916). The Organism as a Whole: From a physicochemical viewpoint. Putnam’s Sons.
Meléndez Minobis, M., Dujarric Martínez, M., Fariñas Rodríguez, L., Posada García, A., & Milán Companioni, D. (2005). Implicaciones éticas de la muerte cerebral y los trasplantes de órganos. Rev Cubana Invest Biomed, 24(1): 60-8.
Omelianchuk A. (2021). Brain Death as the End of a Human Organism as a Self-moving Whole. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 46(5), 530–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhab021.
Pallis C. (1983). ABC of Brain Stem Death. The Declaration of Death. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research ed.), 286(6358), 39. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.286.6358.39.
________ (1990). Brainstem Death. In Vinken, P.J. & Bruyn, G.W. (Ed.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology (vol. 57), 441-496. Elsevier Science Publisher.
President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1981). Defining Death. A Report on the Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death. U.S. Government Printing Office, 75. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/559345/defining_death.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Roth, G. (1997). Das Gehirn und seine Wirklichkeit: kognitive Neurobiologie und ihre philosophischen Konsequenzen. Suhrkamp.
_______ (2000). Ist der Hirntod gleichbedeutend mit dem Tod des Menschen?, in Firnkorn, H., Hirntod als Todeskriterium. Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft.
Smith, P. (1990). Brain Death: A Thomistic Appraisal. Angelicum 67(1), 3-35.
Wijdicks, E. (2000). Brain Death. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sergio Götte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author retains the copyright and grants Revista de Bioética y Derecho the right of first publication of the article. All articles published in Revista de Bioética y Derecho are under Creative Commons licensing Recognition – Non Commercial – NoDerivedArtwork (by-nc-nd 4.0), which allows sharing the content with third parties, provided that they acknowledge its authorship, initial publication in this journal and the terms of the license. No commercial use of the original work or generation of derivative works is permitted.
