Evaluating the Use of White Board Animation in the Learning Process

Authors

  • Jain Mathew Christ University
  • Sridevi Nair Christ University (India)
  • Roseline Gomes Christ University (India)
  • Ankita Mulasi Christ University
  • Preksha Yadav Christ University (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2022.26.40212

Keywords:

Higher education, Learning, Reaction, Whiteboard animation

Abstract

A big challenge for the present-day trainers and teachers is to attract and retain the attention of the students and participants. In the era of social media and smartphones, students have several things that can distract them during the learning process and the responsibility to find ways to engage them effectively falls on the teacher. Based on a review of literature on technological developments, the researchers of the current study propose the use of whiteboard animation multimedia as a tool to enhance the learning experience. In the current study, the effectiveness of this technique is evaluated through a pre-test post-test control group design and the sample comprised of students of the master’s in business administration course. The findings provide empirical evidence supporting the use of whiteboard animation videos to supplement classroom learning.

Author Biographies

Jain Mathew, Christ University

Professor at School of Business and Management, Christ University, Bangalore

Sridevi Nair, Christ University (India)

Assistant Professor, School of Business and Management, Christ University, Bangalore (India)

Roseline Gomes, Christ University (India)

PhD. Scholar of Psychology at CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, and an Assistant Professor of Psychology & Counselor at Jyoti Nivas College Autonomous

Ankita Mulasi, Christ University

Research Scholar, School of Business and Management, Christ University

Preksha Yadav, Christ University (India)

Assistant Professor in Department of Management Studies, CMR Institute of Technology (CMRIT)

References

ABDULRAHAMAN, M. D., FARUK, N., OLOYEDE, A. A., SURAJUDEEN-BAKINDE, N. T., OLAWOYIN, L. A., MEJABI, O. V., ... & AZEEZ, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), e05312.

ALESSI, S. M., & TROLLIP, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. Allyn & Bacon.

ALLIGER, G. M., TANNENBAUM, S. I., BENNETT JR, W., TRAVER, H., & SHOTLAND, A. (1997). A meta‐analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel psychology, 50(2), 341-358.

ALMARA'BEH, H., AMER, E. F., & SULIEMAN, A. (2015). The effectiveness of multimedia learning tools in education. International Journal, 5(12). 761-764.

BARAK, M., ASHKAR, T., & DORI, Y. J. (2011). Learning science via animated movies: its effect on students' thinking and motivation. Computers & Education, 56(3), 839e846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.025 .

BHATTI, U., SHAIKH, S. R., REHMAN, R., MEMON, M. Q., & BULEIDI, J. A. (2015). Chalk and board versus animation based learning. Pakistan Journal of Physiology, 11(1), 20-23.

BROWN, K. G. (2005). An examination of the structure and nomological network of trainee reactions: a closer look at" smile sheets". Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 991.

DE SOUSA, L., RICHTER, B., & NEL, C. (2017). The effect of multimedia use on the teaching and learning of Social Sciences at tertiary level: A case study. Yesterday and Today, (17), 1-22.

EKINCI, D., KARAKOÇ, E., HUT, D., & AVCI, H. E. (2009). Using Multimedia Technologies as a current trends on Social Sciences education. In International Sustainable Symposium on Development Proceedings (pp. 93-106)

KARTHIGA, G. (2019). Multimedia Tools-Augmented Reality And Virtual Reality In Learning English. Think India Journal, 22(4), 451-454.

KIRKPATRICK, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluation training programs. Journal of the american society of training directors, 13, 21-26.

KOSCIANSKI, A., RIBEIRO, R. J., & DA SILVA, S. C. R. (2012). Short animation movies as advance organizers in physics teaching: a preliminary study. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(3), 255e269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.732057 .

LEPINE, J. A., COLQUITT, J. A., & EREZ, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel psychology, 53(3), 563-593

PARK, C. (2003). Engaging students in the learning process: The learning journal. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(2), 183-199.

PEDRA, A., MAYER, R. E., & ALBERTIN, A. L. (2015). Role of interactivity in learning from engineering animations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(4), 614-620.

PRASLOVA, L. (2010). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 22(3), 215-225.

SWELLER, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19e30). New York: Cambridge.

TENG, Y., JIANG, P. X., & WANG, K. (2020). Moral education teaching in colleges and universities based on the application of multimedia technology. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, DOI:10.1177/0020720920940594

TÜRKAY, S. (2016). The effects of whiteboard animations on retention and subjective experiences when learning advanced physics topics. Computers & Education, 98, 102-114.

VAN DER MEIJ, H., & DRAIJER, E. (2021). Design Principles for Multimedia Presentations: A Comparison between a Whiteboard Animation and a PowerPoint Slideshow Presentation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 30(4), 393-418.

WARR, P., ALLAN, C., & BIRDI, K. (1999). Predicting three levels of training outcome. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(3), 351-375.

YAP, W. L. (2016). Transforming conventional teaching classroom to learner-centred teaching classroom using multimedia-mediated learning module. International journal of information and education technology, 6(2), 105-112.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Mathew, J., Nair, S., Gomes, R., Mulasi, A., & Yadav, P. (2022). Evaluating the Use of White Board Animation in the Learning Process. Education and Law Review, (26). https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2022.26.40212

Issue

Section

Educational experiences (innovation)