Attitudes toward Computer, Computer Anxiety and Gender as determinants of Pre-service Science, Technology and Mathematics Teachers’ Computer Self-efficacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2019.36.51-67Paraules clau:
Computer attitude, computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, pre-service STM teacherResum
The study investigated attitudes towards computer and computer anxiety as determinants of computer self-efficacy among 2100 pre-service science, technology and mathematics (STM) teachers from the University of Lagos of Nigeria using the quantitative research method within the blueprint of the descriptive survey design. Data collected were analysed using the descriptive statistics of percentages, mean, and standard deviation and inferential statistics of independent samples t-test, Pearson product moment correlation coefficient and multiple regression analysis. Finding revealed significant correlations between computer attitudes, computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Gender differences in attitude toward computer, computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety among pre-service STM teachers were significant. Affective component, perceived control component, and perceived usefulness component, behavioural intention component, gender, and computer anxiety made statistically significant contributions to the variance in pre-service STM teachers’ computer self-efficacy. The study recommended among others that academic institutions should pay more attention to this computer anxiety and adopt proper ways of reducing the computer anxiety, so that positive e-learning experiences can be created for pre-service STM teachers.
Referències
Albion, P. R. (2001). Some factors in the development of self-efficacy beliefs for computer use among teacher education students, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 321-347. Allwood, C. M., & Wang, Z. (1990). Conceptions of computers among students in China and Sweden. Computers in Human Behavior, 6(2), 185-199. Author (2009). Examining psychometric characteristics of the computer anxiety scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 229–232. Author (2014). Assessing adult learners’ numeracy as related to gender and performance in arithmetic. New Approaches in Educational Research, 3(2), 83-92. doi:10.7821/near.3.2.83-92. Author (2017). Attitudes towards computer and computer self-efficacy as predictors of pre-service mathematics teachers’ computer anxiety. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(2), 91-108. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents 5, 307-337. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Barbeite, F. G. & Weiss, E. M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 1–15. Birisci, S., Metin, M. & Karakas, M. (2009). Prospective elementary teachers’ attitude towards computer and Internet use: A sample from turkey. World Applied Sciences Journal, 6(10), 1433-1440. Brinkerhoff, J. (2006). Effects of a long-duration, professional development academy on technology skills, computer self-efficacy, and technology integration beliefs and practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 22-43. Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12,147-158. Collis, B. A. & Williams, R. L. (1987). Cross-cultural comparison of gender differences in adolescents’ attitudes toward computers and selected school subjects. Journal of Educational Research, 81(1), 17-27. Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test, MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. Durndell, A. & Haag, Z. (2002) Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the internet and reported experience with the internet, by gender, in an east European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 521-535. Embi, R. (2007). Computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy among accounting educators at Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), Malaysia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Malaysia. Farenga, S., & Joyce, B. (1999). Intentions of young students to enrol in science courses in the future: an examination of gender differences. Science Education, 83(1), 55–75. Harrison, A. W. & Rainer, R. R. (2003). Testing the self-efficacy-performance linkage of social-cognitive theory, Journal of Social Psychology, 137(1), 79-87. Haruna, M.D. (2005). Information technology and sustainable development in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Science and Environmental Education 1(1), 178- 183. Hopson, M. H., Simms, R. L., & Knezek, G. A. (2002). Using a Technologically Enriched Environment to improve Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 109-119. Huang, H. M. & Liaw, S. S. (2005). Exploring user’s attitudes and intentions toward the web as a survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 729-743. Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D. & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44(5), 363-379. Kingsley, A. (2005). Computer Assisted Learning. Holland Publishing Inc. Koseoglu, P., Yilmaz, M., Gercek, C. & Soran, H. (2007). Effects of computer courses on achievement, attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs regarding computers. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33, 203-209. Lim C.P. & Khine M.S. (2006) Managing teachers’ barriers to ICT integration in Singapore schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 97–125. Litterell, A. B., Zagumny, M. J. & Zagumny, L. L. (2005). Contextual and psychological predictors of instructional technology use in rural classrooms, Educational Research Quarterly, 29(2), 37-47. Marcoulides, G. A., & Wang, X. B. (1990). A cross-cultural comparison of computer anxiety in college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(3), 251-264. McIlroy, D., Bunting, B., Tierney, K., & Gordon, M. (2001). The relation of gender and background experience to self-reported computing anxiety and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 21-33. Myers, J. M. & Halpin, R. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes and use of multimedia technology in the classroom: Constructivist-based professional development training for school districts. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(4), 133-140. Ojo, M. O. (2005). Information and communication technology (ICT) and teacher preparation for basic education. Journal of Teacher Education, 8(1), 39- 46. Oliver, T. A. & Shapiro, F. (1993). Self-efficacy and computers, Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 20(3), 81-85. Owolabi, T. O., Oyewole, B. K. & Oke, J. O. (2013). Teacher education, information and communication technology: prospects and challenges of e-teaching profession in Nigeria. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 1(2), 87-91. DOI: 10.11634/232907811301314. Pamuk, S. & Peker, D. (2009). Turkish pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ computer related self-efficacies, attitudes, and the relationship between these variables. Computers & Education, 53, 454-461. Rahimi, M., & Yadollahi, S. (2011). Foreign language learning attitude as a predictor of attitudes towards computer-assisted language learning. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 167-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.029. Rekabdarkolaei, S. M., & Amuei, F. (2008). Evaluation of ICT literacy differences in trainee student teachers from the view of sexuality. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 25(3), 176-188. Roger, A., & Duffield, J. (2000). Factors underlying persistent gendered option choices in school science and technology in Scotland. Gender and Education, 12(3), 367–384. Rosen, L. D., & Weil, M. M. (1995). Computer anxiety: A cross-cultural comparison of university students in ten countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 11, 45–64. Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 205-219. Schumacher, P., & Moharan-Martin, T. (2001) Gender, Internet and computer experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 95-110. Selwyn, N. (1997). Students' attitudes toward computers: Validation of a computer attitude scale for 16-19 education. Computers & Education, 28, 35-41. Simsek, A. (2011). The relationship between computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(3), 177- 187. Taghavi, S. E. (2006). The Effects of age, access to a computer, and college status on computer attitudes. Journal of Information technology Impact, 6(1), 1-8. Teo, T. (2007). Perceived importance, enjoyment, and anxiety as correlates of computer attitudes. Psychological Reports, 100, 127-135. Teo, T. (2008). Assessing the computer attitudes of students: An Asian perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (4), 1634 16-42. Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers’ computer attitudes: applying and extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128-143. Todman, J. (2000). Gender differences in computer anxiety among university entrants since 1992. Computers & Education, 34(1), 27-35. Tourkzadeh, G. & Angulo, I. E. (1992). The concept and correlates of computer anxiety. Behavior and Information Technology, 11, 99-108. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & Ackerman, P. L. (2000). A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), 33-60. Zhang, Y. & Espinoza, S. (1998). Relationships among computer self-efficacy, attitudes toward computers, and desirability of learning computing skills. Journal of Research on Technology in education, 30(4), 420-436. Zhao Y., Hueyshan T. & Mishra P. (2001) Technology: teaching and learning: whose computer is it? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 348–355. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S. & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations, Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.
Descàrregues
Publicades
Número
Secció
Llicència
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- The texts published in Digital Education Review, DER, are under a license Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4,0 Spain, of Creative Commons. All the conditions of use in: Creative Commons,
- In order to mention the works, you must give credit to the authors and to this Journal.
- Digital Education Review, DER, does not accept any responsibility for the points of view and statements made by the authors in their work.
