Hacia una visión contemporánea de la Tecnología Educativa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.240-268Paraules clau:
Tecnología Educativa, Diseño instruccional, Filosofía de la tecnología, Nuevas tecnologías aplicadas a la educación, EpistemologíaResum
El objetivo de este trabajo es someter a debate algunos de los temas clave que definen la investigación y la práctica de la Tecnología Educativa académica (TE) en la actualidad y que explican, en parte, su crisis de identidad. El análisis teórico que se presenta centra su atención en cuatro temas: (1) la necesidad de un concepto más actual y matizado sobre qué es la tecnología; (2) una redefinición del campo de estudio de la Tecnología Educativa basada en la relación entre tecnología y educación, ampliando su ámbito de estudio más allá de la dicotomía tradicional entre dispositivos y diseño instruccional; (3) la reconsideración de sus relaciones con otras disciplinas académicas que le sirven como soportes teórico-analíticos; y, finalmente, (4) el análisis de algunas de las debilidades de la investigación actual en TE producto de las asunciones epistemológicas dominantes en las últimas décadas, de las metodologías auspiciadas por las publicaciones y del tipo de conocimiento que promueven.
Referències
Achterhuis, H. (Ed.). (2001). American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Recuperado de http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/374173
Adell, J. (2010). Educación 2.0. En C. Barba & S. Capella (Eds.), Ordenadores en las aulas. La clave es la metodología. (pp. 19-33). Barcelona: Graó.
Adell, J. (2018). Más allá del instrumentalismo en tecnología educativa. En J. Gimeno (Ed.), Cambiar los contenidos, cambiar la educación. Madrid: Morata.
AECT Definition and Terminology Committee. (2004). The Meanings of Educational Technology. AECT Definition and Terminology Committee document #MM4.0. Indiana: University of Indiana. Recuperado de https://www.tlu.ee/~kpata/haridustehnoloogiaTLU/defineeducationaltechnology.pdf
AECT Task Force on Definition and Terminology (Ed.). (1979). The definition of educational technology. Washington: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Anderson, T. y Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Archer, M. S., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. y Norrie, A. (Eds.). (1998). Critical realism: Essential readings. London ; New York: Routledge.
Area, M. (1991a). La tecnología educativa en la actualidad: Las evidencias de una crisis. Qurriculum. Revista de Teoría, Investigación y Práctica Educativa, 3, 1–11. Recuperado de http://www.quadernsdigitals.net/index.php?accionMenu=hemeroteca.VisualizaArticuloIU.visualiza&articulo_id=2650
Area, M. (1991b). Los medios, los profesores y el currículo. Barcelona: Sendai.
Area, M. (2004). Los medios y las tecnologías en la educación (Edición: edición). Madrid: Pirámide.
Area, M., Gros, B. y Marzal, M. (2008). Alfabetizaciones y tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (Edición: 1). Sintesis.
Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9035-7
Baker, T., Smith, L. y Anissa, N. (2019, Febrero). Educ-AI-tion Rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. NESTA. Recuperado de https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/education-rebooted/
Ball, S. (2013). The education debate. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Ball, S. (2016). Following policy: Networks, network ethnography and education policy mobilities. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 549-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1122232
Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Perryman, J. y Hoskins, K. (2011). Assessment technologies in schools: Deliverology and the play of dominations. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 513-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.550012
Bartolomé, A. (1988). Tecnología Educativa. Proyecto docente presentado en el concurso de acceso a la plaza de Profesor Titular de Universidad (Universidad de Barcelona). Barcelona. Recuperado de http://www.lmi.ub.es/personal/bartolome/articuloshtml/bartolome_tit_88/#capitol5
Bartolomé, A. (2008). Vídeo digital y educación (Edición: 1). Editorial Síntesis, S. A.
Bartolomé, A., Castañeda, L. y Adell, J. (2018a). Personalisation in educational technology: The absence of underlying pedagogies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0095-0
Bartolomé, A., Castañeda, L. y Adell, J. (2018b). Personalisation in educational technology: The absence of underlying pedagogies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0095-0
Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
Bennett, S. y Oliver, M. (2011). Talking back to theory: The missed opportunities in learning technology research. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567069.2011.624997
Biesta, G., Filippakou, O., Wainwright, E. y Aldridge, D. (2019). Why educational research should not just solve problems, but should cause them as well. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3509
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Why ‘What Works’ Still Won’t Work: From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19, 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.582255
Bower, M. (2019). Technology‐mediated learning theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1035-1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12771
Brey, P. (2010). Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 14(1), 36-48.
Bromley, H. (1997). The Social Chicken and The Technological Egg: Educational Computing and the Technology/Society Divide. Educational Theory, 47(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1997.00051.x
Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining digital literacy-What do young people need to know about digital media? Digital Kompetanse, 1(Jubileumsnummer), 263-276.
Buckingham, D., Scanlon, M. y Sefton-Green, J. (2001). Selling the Digital Dream. Marketing educational technology to teachers and parents. En A. M. Loveless & V. Ellis (Eds.), ICT, Pedagogy and the Curriculum: Subject to Change. London & New York: Routledge.
Bulfin, S., Henderson, M., Johnson, N. F. y Selwyn, N. (2014). Methodological capacity within the field of “educational technology” research: An initial investigation. Br J Educ Technol, 45, 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12145
Byrne, D. (2005). Complexity, Configurations and Cases. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405057194
Cabero, J. (1996). Nuevas tecnologías, comunicación y educación. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 0(1), 001. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.1996.1.576
Cabero, J. (Ed.). (2007). Tecnología Educativa (Edición: 1). Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España S.L.
Cabero, J. y Martínez Sánchez, F. (Eds.). (1995). Nuevos canales de comunicacion en la enseñanza. Madrid: Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces.
Caena, F. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development: For better learning outcomes. European Commission. Education and Training. Recuperado de http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/policy/school/doc/teachercomp_en.pdf
Carlson, J. y Johnston, L. (2015). Data information literacy: Librarians, data, and the education of a new generation of researchers.
Castañeda, L. (2016). Suelo y sol: Más pensamiento y contexto para la innovación educativa. Boletín de la Institución Libre de Enseñanza, (104), 37-50.
Castañeda, L. (2019). Debates sobre Tecnología y Educación: Caminos contemporáneos y conversaciones pendientes. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.23020
Castañeda, L., Esteve, F. y Adell, J. (2018). ¿Por qué es necesario repensar la competencia docente para el mundo digital? RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 56. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/56/6
Castañeda, L. y Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y
Clark, A. (2003). Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299088
Clow, D. (2012). The Learning Analytics Cycle: Closing the Loop Effectively. En Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 134–138). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330636
Cobo, C. (2016). La Innovación Pendiente. Colección Fundación Ceibal/ Debate. Recuperado de http://innovacionpendiente.com/
Colebatch, H. K. (2015). Participation and Professionalism in Policy Work: Questions for Polities in Transition. Anali Hrvatskog politolotextbackslashvskog drutextbackslashvstva, 11(1), 45-54.
Coll, C. (2016). La personalización del aprendizaje escolar El qué, el por qué y el cómo de un reto insoslayable. En J. Vilalta (Ed.), Reptes de l’educació a Catalunya. Anuari d’Educació 2015 (pp. 43-104). Barcelona: Fundació Jaume Bofill. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305999815_La_personalizacion_del_aprendizaje_escolar_El_que_el_por_que_y_el_como_de_un_reto_insoslayable
Cuban, L. (1993). Computers meet classroom: Classroom wins. Teachers College Record, 95(2), 185-210.
Cuban, L. (2009). Oversold and underused. Harvard university press.
Da Silva, T. T. (1999). Documentos de identidade: Uma introdução às teorias do currículo. Autêntica Editora.
Dabbagh, N. y Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British journal of educational studies, 47(2), 108–121.
De Benito, B. y Salinas, J. M. (2016). La Investigación Basada en Diseño en Tecnología Educativa. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite2016/260631
de Laat, M. y Dohn, N. B. (2019). Is Networked Learning Postdigital Education? Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 17-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00034-1
de Laat, P. B. (2017). Algorithmic Decision-Making Based on Machine Learning from Big Data: Can Transparency Restore Accountability? Philosophy & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0293-z
de Pablos, J. (2009). Tecnología educativa: La formación del profesorado en la era de Internet (Edición: 1). Málaga: Ediciones Aljibe, S.L.
De Vries, M. (2012). Philosophy of Technology. En P. J. Williams (Ed.), Technology Education for Teachers (pp. 15-34). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Decuypere, M. y Simons, M. (2016). Sobre el potencial crítico de los enfoques sociomateriales en educación. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 28, 25. https://doi.org/10.14201/teoredu20162812544
Dede, C., Richards, J. y Saxberg, B. (2018). Learning Engineering for Online Education: Theoretical Contexts and Design-based Examples. New York: Routledge.
Dhar, V. (2013). Data Science and Prediction. Commun. ACM, 56(12), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500499
Edsurge. (2017). The State of Edtech 2016. Edsurge. Recuperado de https://www.edsurge.com/research/reports/the-state-of-edtech-2016
Ely, D. (2008). Frameworks of educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(2), 244-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00810.x
Eraut, M. (1989). Conceptual frameworks and historial development. En M. Eraut (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Educational Technology (1 edition, pp. 11-21). Oxford, England ; New York: Pergamon.
Esteve, F., Castañeda, L. y Adell, J. (2018). Un modelo holístico de competencia docente para el mundo digital. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 32(1).
European Union. (2015a, Noviembre 13). DigCompOrg Framework—EU Science Hub—European Commission. Recuperado 6 de Mayo de 2018, de https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcomporg/framework
European Union. (2015b, Diciembre 11). Promoting Effective Digital-Age Learning: A European Framework for Digitally-Competent Educational Organisations - EU Science Hub - European Commission. Recuperado 6 de Mayo de 2018, de https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/promoting-effective-digital-age-learning-european-framework-digitally-competent-educational
Evans, M. A. (2011). A critical-realist response to the postmodern agenda in instructional design and technology: A way forward. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(6), 799-815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9194-5
Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Harvard University Press.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R. y Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Socio-Material (1 edition). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R. y Sawchuk, P. (2015). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. Routledge.
Ferres, J. (2014). Las pantallas y el cerebro emocional. Barcelona: Gedisa. Recuperado de https://www.amazon.es/pantallas-cerebro-emocional-Comunicaci%C3%B3n-Educativa-ebook/dp/B0168HL8HW/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1523665036&sr=1-1&keywords=joan+ferres+pantallas
Floridi, L. (Ed.). (2016). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Information (1.a ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757544
Floridi, L. (2017). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Friesen, N. (2009). Re-thinking e-learning research: Foundations, methods, and practices (Vol. 333). Peter Lang.
Glister, P., Rlister, P. y Gilster, P. (1998). Digital Literacy (Edición: New Ed). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Goodyear, P. y Carvalho, L. (2013). The Analysis of Complex Learning Environments. En H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age. Designing for 21st Century Learning (2.a ed., pp. 49-63). London & New York: Rouledge.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233. https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
Hamilton, E. y Friesen, N. (2013). Online Education: A Science and Technology Studies Perspective / Éducation en ligne: Perspective des études en science et technologie. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La Revue Canadienne de l’apprentissage et de La Technologie, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2001C
Hannon, J. y Al-Mahmood, R. (2014). The place of theory in educational technology research. En Rhetoric and reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ASCILITE Conference (pp. 745–750).
Hayles, N. K. (2007). Hyper and Deep Attention: The Generational Divide in Cognitive Modes. Profession, 2007(1), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1632/prof.2007.2007.1.187
Hayles, N. K. (2012). How we think: Digital media and contemporary technogenesis. Chicago ; London: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayles, N. K. (2016). Cognitive assemblages: Technical agency and human interactions. Critical Inquiry, 43(1), 32–55.
Honan, E. (2010). Mapping discourses in teachers’ talk about using digital texts in classrooms. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596301003679701
Ibrahim, A. A. (2015). Evolutionary Nature of the Definition of Educational Technology. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 5(2), 233-239.
Jameson, J. (2019). Developing critical and theoretical approaches to educational technology research and practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 951-955. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12775
Januszewski, A. (2001). Educational technology: The development of a concept. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
Jones, C. y Czerniewicz, L. (2011). Theory in learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 173-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567069.2011.632491
Jones, C. y Kennedy, G. (2011). Stepping beyond the paradigm wars: Pluralist methods for research in learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(sup1), 7798. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19s1/7798
Kimmons, R. y Johnstun, K. (2019). Navigating Paradigms in Educational Technology. TechTrends, 63(5), 631-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00407-0
Kirschner, P. A. y Kester, L. (2016). Towards a Research Agenda for Educational Technology Research. En N. Rushby & D. W. Surry (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Learning Technology (pp. 523-541). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118736494.ch27
Knight, S., Allen, L., Gibson, A., McNamara, D. y Buckingham Shum, S. (2017). Writing analytics literacy: Bridging from research to practice (pp. 496-497). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3029425
Kroes, P. y Verbeek, P.-P. (Eds.). (2014). The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts (Vol. 17). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3
Lai, J. W. M. y Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 133, 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A. y Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A Systematic Study of the Published Literature 2008-2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
Martínez Bonafé, J. (2001). Arqueología del concepto «compromiso social» en el discurso pedagógico y de formación docente. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa (REDIE), 3(1). Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=15503106
Martínez, F. y Prendes, M. P. (2003). ¿Adónde va la educación en un mundo de tecnologías? En F. Martínez (Ed.), Redes de comunicación en la enseñanza (pp. 281-300). Barcelona: Paidós. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=756021
Martínez Sánchez, F. (2007). La integración escolar de las nuevas tecnologías. En J. Cabero (Ed.), Nuevas Tecnologías aplicadas a la educación (pp. 21-40). Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España S.L.
McCann, E. (2011). Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Toward a Research Agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
McFarlane, A. E. (2019). Devices and desires: Competing visions of a good education in the digital age. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1125-1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12764
Menashy, F. (2015). Understanding the roles of non-state actors in global governance: Evidence from the Global Partnership for Education. Journal of Education Policy, 31(1), 98-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1093176
Mintrom, M. y Vergari, S. (1998). Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 126-148. https://doi.org/10.2307/2648004
Moreno, G. A., Jimenez, J. A. y Puche, W. S. (2016). Ubiquitous Personal Learning Environment model (uPLEMO). En 2016 Technologies Applied to Electronics Teaching (TAEE) (pp. 1-8). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAEE.2016.7528383
Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology: Educational technology and determinism. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x
Oliver, M. (2016a). What is Technology. En N. Rushby & D. Surry (Eds.), Wiley Handbook of Learning Technology (Edición: 1). Chichester, UK ; Malden, MA: Wiley Handbooks in Education.
Oliver, M. (2016b). What is Technology? En The Wiley Handbook of Learning Technology (pp. 35–57). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118736494.ch3
Pangrazio, L. y Selwyn, N. (2018). ‘Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 1461444818799523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523
Papert, S. (1981). Computers and computer cultures. Creative Computing, 7(3), 82-92.
Parejo, N. y Olmedo, E. M. (2017). ANÁLISIS DEL PLE Y OLE DE UN GRUPO DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA. UN ESTUDIO DE CASOS CON CANVAS, 6.
Player-Koro, C., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A. y Selwyn, N. (2017). Selling tech to teachers: Education trade shows as policy events. Journal of Education Policy, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1380232
Prendes, M. P. (1997). Tecnología Educativa. Proyecto docente presentado en el concurso de acceso a la plaza de Profesor Titular de Universidad (Universidad de Murcia). Murcia.
Provost, F. y Fawcett, T. (2013). Data Science and its Relationship to Big Data and Data-Driven Decision Making. Big Data, 1(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2013.1508
Reeves, T. C. y Oh, E. G. (2017). The goals and methods of educational technology research over a quarter century (1989–2014). Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 325–339.
Reiser, R. A. (2001). A History of Instructional Design and Technology: Part I: A History of Instructional Media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53-64. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/30220299
Rodríguez, J. y Martínez-Bonafé, J. (2016). Libros de texto y control del curriculum en el contexto de la sociedad digital. Cadernos CEDES, 36(100), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1590/cc0101-32622016171317
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition (Edición: 5th Edition.). New York: Simon & Schuster.
Saettler, P. (1978). The Roots of Educational Technology. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 15(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0033039780150102
Saettler, P. (1990). Evolution of American Educational Technology (Edición: Revised). Englewood, Colo: Libraries Unlimited Inc.
Saeverot, H. y Kvam, V. (2019). An alternative model of researching educational practice: A pedagogic–stereoscopic point of view. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3493
Salinas, J. (1991). Proyecto docente presentado en el concurso de acceso a la plaza de Profesor Titular de Universidad del área de Didáctica y Organización Escolar (Universitat de les Illes Balears). Palma de Mallorca.
Sancho, J. M. (Ed.). (1994). Para una tecnología educativa. Horsori.
Sarramona, F. y Fernández, A. (1978). La educación. Constantes y problemática actual. CEAC, Barcelona.
Scott, D. (2005). Critical realism and empirical research methods in education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(4), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2005.00460.x
Scott, David. (2013). Education, Epistemology and Critical Realism (1.a ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883099
Selwyn, N. (2016a). Is technology good for education? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Selwyn, N. (2016b). ¿Nuevas culturas del aprendizaje ?: (Una conversación con Linda Castañeda). Boletín de la Institución Libre de Enseñanza, (104), 51-77.
Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: Critical questions. En G. Ferreira, L. Da Silva Rosado, & J. Sá Carvalho (Eds.), Education and Technology: Critical approaches (pp. 105-122). Rio de Janeiro: SESES. Recuperado de https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/rmyg8/
Shannon, C. y Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
Siemens, G. y Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE review, 46(5), 30.
Spector, J. M. (2016a). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group.
Spector, J. M. (2016b). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives (Second edition). New York: Routledge.
Spring, J. (2012). Globalization of Education. International Journal of Chinese Education, 1(2), 139-176. https://doi.org/10.1163/22125868-12340002
Starkey, L. (2012). Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age (Edición: 1). New York, NY: Routledge.
Stiegler, B. (2015). States of shock: Stupidity and knowledge in the twenty-first century. Cambridge ; Malden, MA: Polity.
Stone, D. (2008). Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities, and Their Networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00251.x
Strydom, S. y Fourie-Malherbe, M. (2019). Pluralism as a Vehicle for Theory-Building in Educational Technology Research. En J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (Vol. 5, pp. 173-191). Emerald.
Swan, M. (2013). The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery. Big Data, 1(2), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2012.0002
Taffel, S. (2016). Perspectives on the postdigital: Beyond rhetorics of progress and novelty. Convergence, 22(3), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514567827
Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C. y Schmid, R. F. (2011). What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
Thomson, P., Hall, C. y Jones, K. (2010). Maggies day: A smallscale analysis of English education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 25(5), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680931003783346
Trisha Greenhalgh y Jill Russell. (2009). Evidence-Based Policymaking: A Critique. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2), 304-318. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0085
Vázquez-Cano, E. y Meneses, E. L. (2015). La filosofía educativa de los MOOC y la educación universitaria. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 18(2), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.18.2.14261
Veletsianos, G. y Moe, R. (2017, Abril). The Rise of Educational Technology as a Sociocultural and Ideological Phenomenon. Educause Review. Recuperado de https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/4/the-rise-of-educational-technology-as-a-sociocultural-and-ideological-phenomenon
Waller, M. A. y Fawcett, S. E. (2013). Data Science, Predictive Analytics, and Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform Supply Chain Design and Management. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12010
Watters, A. (2016). The Curse of the Monsters of Education Technology. Amazon.
Webster, M. D. (2017). Philosophy of Technology Assumptions in Educational Technology Leadership. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 25–36. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.20.1.25.pdf
West, R. E. y Borup, J. (2014). An analysis of a decade of research in 10 instructional design and technology journals: Analysis of IDT research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 545-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12081
Whitson, J. R. (2013). Gaming the quantified self. Surveillance and Society, 11(1-2), 163-176.
Williamson, B. (2013). The future of the curriculum: School knowledge in the digital age. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Williamson, B. (2015). Political computational thinking: Policy networks, digital governance and learning to code. Critical Policy Studies, 10(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1052003
Williamson, B. (2017). Moulding student emotions through computational psychology: Affective learning technologies and algorithmic governance. Educational Media International, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2017.1407080
Williamson, B., Potter, J. y Eynon, R. (2019). New research problems and agendas in learning, media and technology: The editors’ wishlist. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1614953
Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136.
Yanchar, S. C. y Williams, D. D. (2006). Reconsidering the compatibility thesis and eclecticism: Five proposed guidelines for method use. Educational researcher, 35(9), 3–12.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M. y Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhao, Y. (2017). What works may hurt: Side effects in education. Journal of Educational Change, 18(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9294-4
Zheng, L. (2015). A systematic literature review of design-based research from 2004 to 2013. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 399-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0036-z
Descàrregues
Publicades
Número
Secció
Llicència
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- The texts published in Digital Education Review, DER, are under a license Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4,0 Spain, of Creative Commons. All the conditions of use in: Creative Commons,
- In order to mention the works, you must give credit to the authors and to this Journal.
- Digital Education Review, DER, does not accept any responsibility for the points of view and statements made by the authors in their work.
