From learning contexts to learning lives: Studying learning (dis)continuities from the perspective of the learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2018.33.1-25Keywords:
Learning lives, context, arts-based education, situations,Abstract
As digital technologies continue transforming the time and space boundaries that traditionally had been ascribed to different educational settings, the very notion of learning context also is being challenged in educational research literature. In this article, we contribute to this debate by offering an empirically grounded discussion on the contrast between customary notions of context—which emphasize self-containment—and the emerging notion of learning lives—which aims to capture the dialectical relation between continuity and transformation. We draw from empirical materials collected through a participant ethnography at an arts-based, community-oriented primary school, where we follow the learning life of a student participating at a theater project as she moves between the school and the home settings. Our analyses reveal how different conceptualizations and units of analysis lead to different characterizations of the ways digital tools foster (dis)continuities across settings and time.
References
Akkerman, S F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
Barron, B. (2004). Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 1–36.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Beach, K. (1999). Chapter 4: Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 1999, 24, 101–139.
Biesta, G. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Bronkhorst, L. H., & Akkerman, S. F. (2016). At the boundary of school: Continuity and discontinuity in learning across contexts. Educational Research Review, 19, 18–35.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Cole, M. (2003). Culture and cognitive science. Outlines, 1, 3–15.
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. The Psychological Review, 3(4), 357–370.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic. The theory of inquiry. Henry Holt and Company.
Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York, NY: Touchstone. Originally published in 1938
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1999). Knowing and the known. In R. Handy & E. E. Hardwood, Useful procedures of inquiry (pp. 97–209). Great Barrington, MA: Behavioral Research Council. (First published in 1949)
Edwards, R. (2009). Introduction: Life as a learning context? In R. Edwards, G. Biesta, & M. Thorpe (Eds.), Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching. Communities, activities and networks (pp. 1–13). London, England: Routledge.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319–336.
Erstad, O. (2012). The learning lives of digital youth—beyond the formal and informal. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 25–43.
Erstad, O. (2013). Digital learning lives. New York: NY. Peter Lang Publishing.
Erstad, O., Kumpulainen, K., Mäkitalo, Å., Schrøder, K. C., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., & Jóhannsdóttir, T. (2016). Tracing learning experiences within and across contexts. A Nordic approach. In O. Erstad, K. Kumpulainen, Å. Mäkitalo, K. C. Schrøder, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, & T. Jóhannsdóttir (Eds.), Learning across contexts in the knowledge society (pp. 1–14). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
Greeno, J. G. (1997). Response: On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London, UK: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archeology, art and architecture. London, UK: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2015). The life of lines. London: Routledge.
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103.
Jornet, A., & Roth, W-M. (2018). Imagining design: Transitive and intransitive dimensions. Design Studies, 56, 28–53.
Jornet, A., Roth, W-M., & Krange, I. (2016). A transactional approach to transfer episodes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 285-330. DOI:10.1080/10508406.2016.1147449
Kumpulainen, K., & Sefton-Green, J. (2014). What is connected learning and how to research it? International Journal of Learning and Media, 4(2), 7–18.
Kumpulainen, K., Mikkola, A., & Jaatinen, A-M. (2014). The chronotopes of technology-mediated creative learning practices in an elementary school community. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 53–74.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leander, K. M. (2001). “This is our freedom bus going home right now”: Producing and hybridizing space time contexts in pedagogical discourse. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 637–679.
Macbeth, D. (2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in Society, 33, 703–736.
McDermott, R. P. (1980). Profile: Ray L. Birdwhistell. Kinesis Report, 2(3), 1-4, 14-16.
McDermott, R. P. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269–305). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McDermott, R. P., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24(3/4), 245–275.
Mehan, H. (1979). “What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into practice, 18(4), 285–294.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge. Original published in French in 1945
Reed, S. K. (2012). Learning by mapping across situations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 353–398.
Roth, S., & Erstad, O. (2016). Positional identities in educational transitions: Connecting contemporary and future trajectories among multiethnic girls. Ethnography and Education, 11, 57–73.
Roth, W-M. (2014). Rules of bending, bending the rules: The geometry of electrical conduit bending in college and workplace. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86, 177–192.
Roth, W-M., & Jornet, A. (2014). Towards a theory of experience. Science Education, 98, 106–126.
Roth, W-M., & Jornet, A. (2018). From object-oriented to fluid ontology: A case study of the materiality of design work in agile software development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 27, 37–75.
Schegloff, E. (1989). Reflections on language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In M. H. Bornstein, & J.S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in Human Development (pp. 139–153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8, 165–187.
Sefton-Green, J., & Erstad, O. (2017). Researching “learning lives”—a new agenda for learning, media and technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 42, 246–250.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
The Leader in Me (n.d.). A whole school transformation process. Retrieved from http://www.theleaderinme.org/what-is-the-leader-in-me/
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Turner, J. C., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. Teachers College Record, 106, 1759–1785.
Van Oers, B. (1998). From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 473–488.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. New York: Springer.
Wiig, C., Silseth, K., & Erstad, O. (2017). Creating intercontextuality in students trajectories. Opportunities and difficulties. Language and Education, 32(1), 43–59.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- The texts published in Digital Education Review, DER, are under a license Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4,0 Spain, of Creative Commons. All the conditions of use in: Creative Commons,
- In order to mention the works, you must give credit to the authors and to this Journal.
- Digital Education Review, DER, does not accept any responsibility for the points of view and statements made by the authors in their work.
