Decriminalization of euthanasia in Belgium: a profile of twenty years and deontological implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2023.59.42795Keywords:
medical ethics, personal autonomy, euthanasia, end of life care, BelgiumAbstract
The article brings into context the statistics of twenty years since the decriminalization of euthanasia in Belgium. In reconstructing this process, the central aspects of the policy are analysed, such as its democratic nature and the protection of conscientious objection. Often discussed in isolation, this article considers voluntary end of life as part of a palliative program that, in turn, integrates a broader vision, as reflected in the 2002 package of regulations. In addition to outlining some of its consequences, deontological and otherwise, the article underlines the exceptional use of euthanasia, limited to duly qualified cases of physical or mental suffering, but that it also significantly increases respect for the autonomy of the person. All in all, the article invites us to consider multiple moral codes in the face of one of the few events of which we are certain: death.
References
Andino, C. (2017). Ética de mínimos y pluralidad democrática. Aportes actuales de la ética civil de Adela Cortina. Revista Científica de la UCSA, 4(1), 67-79.
Asociación Latinoamericana de Cuidados Paliativos. Reporte 2016 – 2018.
http://cuidadospaliativos.org/uploads/2018/3/Reporte%20ALCP%202016-2018.pdf.
Association Belge pour le Droit de Mourir dans la Dignité, ADMD (1982). Bulletin Bimestriel, 4. http://www.admd.be/wp-content/uploads/Bulletins/1980-1989/Bulletin-004.pdf.
Barnato, A. E. (2017). Challenges in understanding and respecting patients’ preferences. Health Affairs, 36(7), 1252-1257.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Ediciones Loyola.
Bravo, P., Contreras, A., Perestelo-Pérez, L., Pérez-Ramos, J., & Málaga, G. (2013). En busca de una salud más participativa: compartiendo decisiones de salud. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, 30, 691-697.
Bréhaux, K. (2010). Quelle place pour les droits individuels et les libertés publiques? France et Belgique, l’avortement et l’euthanasie en débat. Éthique & Santé, 7(1), 3-7.
Colby, G. (2016). Death and the Contemporary, Introduction. New Formations, 89, 5-278.
Collado, C., & Castillo, S. (2017). Reflexiones sobre enfermería desde la biopolítica: relaciones de poder y cuidado. Cultura de los Cuidados, 21(47):22–7. DOI: 10.14198/cuid.2017.47.03.
Commission Fédérale de Contrôle et d'Évaluation de l'Euthanasie (2023). Euthanasie – Chiffres de l’année 2022. https://organesdeconcertation.sante.belgique.be/fr/documents/euthanasie-chiffres-de-lannee-2022 .
Conseil National de l’Ordre des Médecins (2017). Obligation déontologique de renvoi en cas de refus de pratiquer une euthanasie. Avis du Conseil national du 6 mai 2017.
Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme (2022). Affaire Mortier c. Belgique. Requête n° 7817/17. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-219559.
Cundiff, D. (2012). Euthanasia is not the answer: A hospice physician’s view. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Dierickx, S., Cohen, J., Vander Stichele, R., Deliens, L., & Chambaere, K. (2018). Drugs used for euthanasia: a repeated population-based mortality follow-back study in Flanders, Belgium, 1998–2013. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 56(4), 551-559.
Duggan, P. S., Geller, G., Cooper, L. A., & Beach, M. C. (2006). The moral nature of patient-centeredness: is it “just the right thing to do”? Patient Education and Counseling, 62(2), 271-276.
Dunn, M., & Hope, T. (2018). Medical ethics: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Engelhardt, H. T. (2012). Beyond the principles of bioethics: facing the consequences of fundamental moral disagreement. Ethic@, 11(1), 13-31.
Fédération Royale du Notariat Belge (2023). Déclaration de Volonté Anticipées. Disponible: https://www.notaire.be/famille/la-protection-de-mes-proches/les-declarations-de-volonte-anticipees.
Foucault, M. (1994). Dits et écrits. Paris: Gallimard.
Gómez-Vírseda, C., De Maeseneer, Y., & Gastmans, C. (2020).
Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities. BMC Medical Ethics, 21, 1-14.
Gordijn, B., & Janssens, R. (2004). Euthanasia and palliative care in the Netherlands: an analysis of the latest developments. Health Care Analysis, 12, 195-207.
Het Nieuwsblad (2016). Voor het eerst in ons land krijgt kind euthanasie. Vlaamse minderjarige op eigen vraag gestorven na slepende ziekte. 17 sep 2016. [acceso 4 abr 2023]. https://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20160916_02472929.
Institut Européen de Bioéthique (2020). Note de Synthèse. Rapport 2020 de la Commission Euthanasie en Belgique https://www.ieb-eib.org/fr/actualite/fin-de-vie/euthanasie-et-suicide-assiste/note-de-synthese-rapport-2020-de-la-commission-euthanasie-en-belgique-1915.html.
Institut Européen de Bioéthique (2022). Note de synthèse : Rapport 2022 de la Commission Euthanasie en Belgique. https://www.ieb-eib.org/fr/etude/fin-de-vie/euthanasie-et-suicide-assiste/note-de-synthese-rapport-2022-de-la-commission-euthanasie-en-belgique-537.html.
Kenis, Y. (2002). 20ème anniversaire de l’ABDMD. Bulletin de l’ABDMD, 84:10-12.
La Dernière Heure (1995) 4 belges sur 5 veulent dépénaliser l'euthanasie. 17 noviembre 1995, 17, 6.
La Dernière Heure (2002). La Belgique ose l’euthanasie. 17 mayo 2002 https://www.dhnet.be/actu/societe/2002/05/17/la-belgique-ose-leuthanasie-U5UIMOTJPRGJFMT6WF3XJL5XGM/
La Libre Belgique (2002). Permis légal de tuer pour les uns, liberté fondamentale pour d'autres. 15 mayo 2002 https://www.lalibre.be/belgique/2002/05/18/permis-legal-de-tuer-pour-les-uns-liberte-fondamentale-pour-dautres-55RTHJ2U35GLZJD6LVLF7F63SM/.
La Libre Belgique (2001). Trois Belges sur quatre pour la “loi euthanasie”. 28 marzo 2001 https://www.lalibre.be/2001/03/29/trois-belges-sur-quatre-pour-la-loi-euthanasie-4BG2OEDOVZAHXNK3MQQC6HQELM/.
Le Marcis, F., & Faye, S. L. B. (2019). Pour une économie de la valeur en prison. Politique Africaine, 155(3), 55-81.
Leuter, C., La Cerra, C., Calisse, S., Dosa, D., Petrucci, C., & Lancia, L. (2018). Ethical difficulties in healthcare: A comparison between physicians and nurses. Nursing ethics, 25(8), 1064-1074.
Ley 21.375. (Chile) Consagra los cuidados paliativos y los derechos de las personas que padecen enfermedades terminales o graves, 14 oct 2021. https://bcn.cl/2s7nx.
Loi relative à l’euthanasie. § 2002009590 (2002). https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/eli/loi/2002/05/28/2002009590/justel.
Loi relative aux droits du patient. § 2002022737 (2002).
http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/eli/loi/2002/08/22/2002022737/justel.
Mbembe, A. (2019). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11-40.
Ministerio de Salud de Chile (2022). Orientación Técnica Cuidados Paliativos Universales (Documento en Revisión). Disponible: https://diprece.minsal.cl/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Orientacion-Tecnica-Cuidados-Paliativos-Universales.pdf.
Norwood, F., Kimsma, G., & Battin, M. P. (2009). Vulnerability and the ‘slippery slope’at the end-of-life: a qualitative study of euthanasia, general practice and home death in The Netherlands. Family Practice, 26(6), 472-480.
Office Belge de Statistique, Statbel (2023) https://statbel.fgov.be/en.
Ordre des Médecins (2017). Code de déontologie médicale commenté. https://gcm.rmnet.be/clients/rmnet/content/medias/codecom-20190808.pdf.
Plateforme Bruxelloise pour la Santé Mentale, PBSM (2017). Déclarations anticipées. Comment faire respecter son avis quand on n’est plus capable de l’exprimer ? https://www.plateformepsylux.be/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/D%C3%A9claration-anticip%C3%A9es-VF.pdf.
Schamps, G. (2018). The Concept of Human Dignity in Belgian Law: A Variety of Approaches. In: B. Feuillet-Liger and K. Orfali (Eds), The Reality of Human Dignity in Law and Bioethics: Comparative Perspectives, 3-23. Cham: Springer.
Walter, J. K., & Ross, L. F. (2014). Relational autonomy: moving beyond the limits of isolated individualism. Pediatrics, 133(Supplement 1), S16-S23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ricardo Ayala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author retains the copyright and grants Revista de Bioética y Derecho the right of first publication of the article. All articles published in Revista de Bioética y Derecho are under Creative Commons licensing Recognition – Non Commercial – NoDerivedArtwork (by-nc-nd 4.0), which allows sharing the content with third parties, provided that they acknowledge its authorship, initial publication in this journal and the terms of the license. No commercial use of the original work or generation of derivative works is permitted.
