This is an outdated version published on 2021-10-15. Read the most recent version.

Divergences on the achievement of the targets of Sustainable Development Goal 4 of the 2030 Agenda

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2021.1EXT.37698

Keywords:

Sustainable Development Education, Right to education, global citizenship education, the 2030 Agenda

Abstract

The debate over the State appropriate role in education has been persisted in Spain. The understanding of the current meaning of "education", - seated seamlessly in the pedagogical field - does not have its corresponding reflection in the socio-political field. This paper analyses, on the one hand, the axiological contents of target 4.7 of the 2030 Agenda and its implementation in Spanish formal education; on the other, the latest controversies originating from their transmission values in the Spanish educational field: the so-called parental pin-, which consists of leaving parents the power to expressly authorize the participation of their children in any complementary activity with content of an ethical, social, civic, moral or sexual nature; and, the opposition against the new educational reform, Organic Law 3/2020, of December 29, which modifies Organic Law 2/2006, of May 3, on Education (hereinafter LOMLOE). This study proposes a more comprehensive interpretation to Article 27.2 CE to better advance the path towards education based on values according to the 2030 Agenda goals.

Author Biography

Beatriz Souto Galván, University of Alicante

Professor of State Ecclesiastical Law
Department of Historical-Legal Sciences

References

AGIRREAZKUENAGA, L. (2020). Education for Agenda 2030: What Direction do We Want to Take Going Forward? Sustainability, 12, 2035, 1-13. Doi: 10.3390/su12052035

ALÁEZ CORRAL, B. (2011). El ideario educativo constitucional como límite a las libertades educativas, Revista Europea de Derechos Fundamentales, 17, 91-129.

DE PUELLES BENÍTEZ, M. (2012). La educación en el Constitucionalismo español, Cuestiones Pedagógicas, 21, 15-35. FARREL, M. D. (1998). El Derecho liberal, Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot.

FERNÁNDEZ, C., SUNDSTRÖM, M. (2011). Citizenship Education and Liberalism: A State of the Debate Analysis 1990–2010, Stud Philos Educ 30, 363-384. DOI 10.1007/s11217-011-9237-8.

FERNÁNDEZ-MIRANDA CAMPOAMOR, A. (2007). Educación para la ciudadanía. Una perspectiva constitucional, en Educación en valores. Ideología y religión en la escuela pública. A. López Castillo (ed.), Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, Madrid.

MARCELO GARCÍA, C., ESTEBARANZ GARCÍA, A. (1998). Modelos de colaboración entre la Universidad y las Escuelas de Formación del Profesorado, Revista de Educación 317, 97-120.

MARTÍNEZ LÓPEZ-MUÑIZ, J.L. (1979). La educación en la Constitución española. Derechos fundamentales y Libertades públicas en materia de enseñanza. Persona y Derecho, 6, 215-295.

NUEVO LÓPEZ, P. (2014). Derechos fundamentales e ideario educativo constitucional, UNED. Revista de Derecho Político, 89, 205-238.

MURGA-MENOYO, Mª. A. (2018). La Formación de la Ciudadanía en el Marco de la Agenda 2030 y la Justicia Ambiental, Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social (RIEJS), 7(1), 37-52. Doi: 10.15366/riejs2018.7.1.002.

VIDAL PRADO, C. (2017). El diseño constitucional de los derechos educativos ante los retos los retos presentes y futuros, UNED. Revista de Derecho Político, 100, 739-766.

Published

2021-10-15 — Updated on 2021-10-15

Versions

How to Cite

Souto Galván, B. . (2021). Divergences on the achievement of the targets of Sustainable Development Goal 4 of the 2030 Agenda. Education and Law Review, (1 Extraordinario), 192–214. https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2021.1EXT.37698