Pregnancy and risk: obstetric ultrasound during gestation in Catalunya

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/contxt.2024.13.219-250

Keywords:

pregnancy, ultrasound, risk, foetus, medicalization

Abstract

The widespread use of ultrasound in the biomedical monitoring of pregnancy has implied transformations at the obstetric, social and cultural level, and has also has an affect on the pregnant women's bodily experiences. This research aims to explore and understand the role of obstetric ultrasounds in pregnancy, based on the analysis of pregnant women's experiences, paying particular attention to how the performance of ultrasounds influences the construction of pregnancy-related risk. To address this issue, ethnographic research based on participant observation has been conducted, primarily involving in-depth interviews with eleven pregnant women. As conclusions, the conception of pregnancy as a “risky” process appears to be internalized by pregnant women, thereby demonstrating how the process of medicalization has been embodied as a result of the normalization of their healthcare monitoring. As part of the biomedicalization process, self-regulatory practices have been incorporated into daily life habits, in order to minimize risks of complications in the foetus. This leads pregnant women to feel responsible for adhering to these practices as well as guaranteeing the well-being of the future baby. Finally, the ultrasound allows pregancy to be perceived as real, shifting the pregnant woman’s bodily knowledge towards technological and biomedical discourse, and is used as a means to alleviate concerns regarding the health and life of the foetus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Arianna Rosich-Soteras, Universitat de Barcelona

Arianna Rosich-Sotera és Diplomada en Infermeria (Universitat de Barcelona), treballa al servei d'oncohematologia de l'Hospital Clínic des de l'any 2012. Va cursar el Màster oficial en metodologia de la investigació aplicada a les cures infermeres (Universitat de Barcelona). Des que va acabar infermeria es va endinsar al món de l'antropologia, finalitzant el grau en Antropologia Social i Cultural el 2023 (Universitat de Barcelona).

References

Andaya, Elise y Mounia El Kotni. 2022. “The Anthropology of Reproduction.” En A Companion to Medical Anthropology, editado por Merrill Singer, Pamela I. Erickson, y César E. Abadía-Barrero, 213–229. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.

Beck, Ulrich. 2019. Sociedad del riesgo. Barcelona: Paidós.

Blázquez Rodríguez, María Isabel. 2005. “Aproximación a la antropología de la reproducción.” AIBR: Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, no. 42: 1-25. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1248272

Conrad, Peter. 2007. The medicalization of society: on the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Departament de Salut. Generalitat de Catalunya. 2018. Protocol de seguiment de l’embaràs a Catalunya. 3ª edició revisada: https://salutpublica.gencat.cat/web/.content/minisite/aspcat/promocio_salut/embaras_part_puerperi/protocol_seguiment_embaras/protocol-seguiment-embaras-2018.pdf

Departament de Salut. 2021. Servei de Salut Maternoinfantil. Dades 2020. https://salutpublica.gencat.cat/ca/ambits/promocio_salut/Embaras-part-i-puerperi/Xifres-i-dades/Infografia-dades-2020/

Esteban, Mari Luz. 1994. Actitudes y percepciones de las mujeres respecto a su salud reproductiva y sexual; necesidades de salud percibidas por las mujeres y respuesta del sistema sanitario. Barcelona: Publicacions Universitat de Barcelona.

______. 2013. Antropología del cuerpo: género, itinerarios corporales, identidad y cambio. Manresa: Edicions Bellaterra.

Foucault, Michel. 1999. Estrategias de poder. Barcelona: Paidós.

______. 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Edited by Colin Gordon. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Gammeltoft, Tine, y Hạnh Thị Thuý Nguyễn. 2007. “The Commodification of Obstetric Ultrasound Scanning in Hanoi, Vietnam.” Reproductive Health Matters 15 (29): 163-171. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/17512387

Gareth M., Thomas, Julie Roberts, Frances E. Griffiths. 2017. "Ultrasound as a technology of reassurance? How pregnant women and health care professionals articulate ultrasound reassurance and its limitations". Sociology of Health and Illness 39 (6): 893–907. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12554

Georges, Eugenia. 1996. “Fetal Ultrasound Imaging and the Production of Authoritative Knowledge in Greece.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 10 (2): 157-175. https://www.jstor.org/stable/649291

Harris, Gillian, Linda Connor, Andrew Bisits, y Nick Higginbotham. 2004. “'Seeing the Baby': Pleasures and Dilemmas of Ultrasound Technologies for Primiparous Australian Women.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 18 (1): 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2004.18.1.23

Imaz Martínez, Elixabete. 2009. Mujeres gestantes, madres en gestación. Tesis doctoral, Universidad del País Vasco. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/12245

Krakovski-Chazan, Lilian, y Livi F. T. Faro. 2016. “'Holy Scan' or 'Picture of the Baby?' Biomedicalization and Stratification in the Use of Obstetric Ultrasound in Rio de Janeiro.” História, Ciências, Saúde 23, no. 1: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702016000100005

Larrea-Killinger, Cristina, Araceli Muñoz, Arantza Begueri, y Jaume Mascaró Pons. 2019. “'Como un sedimento que se va quedando en el cuerpo': Percepción social del riesgo sobre compuestos tóxicos persistentes y otras sustancias químicas sintéticas en la alimentación entre mujeres embarazadas y lactantes en España.” Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana 14, no. 1 (enero-abril): 121–144. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.140107e

Lupton, Deborah. 2012. “'Precious Cargo’: Foetal Subjects, Risk and Reproductive Citizenship.” Critical Public Health 22, no. 3 (septiembre): 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2012.657612

Martin, Emily. 1993. The Woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.

Roberts, Julie; Frances E. Griffiths, Alice Verran, Catherine Ayre. 2015. "Why do women seek ultrasound scans from commercial providers during pregnancy?". Sociology of Health & Illness, 37, no.4 (June): 594-609. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12218

Stephenson, Niamh, Kim McLeod, y Catherine Mills. 2016. “Ambiguous Encounters, Uncertain Foetuses: Women’s Experiences of Obstetric Ultrasound.” Feminist Review 113 (1): 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2016.6

Taylor, Janelle S. 2000. “Of Sonograms and Baby Prams: Prenatal Diagnosis, Pregnancy, and Consumption.” Feminist Studies 26, no. 2 (verano): 391–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178541

Vidal, Maria José et al. (eds). 2022. Indicadors de salut perinatal a Catalunya. Any 2020. Informe executiu. Secretaria de Salut Pública. Departament de Salut.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-29

How to Cite

Rosich-Soteras, Arianna. 2024. “Pregnancy and Risk: Obstetric Ultrasound During Gestation in Catalunya”. (Con)textos: Revista d’antropologia I Investigació Social, no. 13 (November). Barcelona, Espanya:219-50. https://doi.org/10.1344/contxt.2024.13.219-250.

Issue

Section

Research projects