Philosophical, ethical and pedagogical implications of the use of Artificial Intelligence in education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2024.45.29-36Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Teacher-Student Relationship, Ethics, PedagogyAbstract
This article examines the philosophical, ethical and pedagogical implications of the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education. In this way, and starting from the diversity of opinions on the potential of AI in this field, ranging from enthusiastic perspectives to alarmist predictions, this study proposes a critical and exploratory analysis of these implications through a hermeneutic approach that considers different relevant perspectives in order to evaluate and guide the use of AI in education and its potential impact on the pedagogical relationship, betting on the humanisation of technology and avoiding the technologisation of humans. The ultimate purpose is to better understand the challenges and opportunities presented by the convergence of AI and education, and to promote a competent and conscious use of these technologies, especifically on terms of Teacher-Student Relationship.
References
Aguilar, F. R., y Chamba, A. P. (2019). Reflexiones sobre la filosofía de la tecnología en los procesos educativos. Revista Conrado, 15(70), 109-119.
An, T., y Oliver, M. (2020). What in the world is educational technology? Rethinking the field from the perspective of the philosophy of technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 6-19.
Area, M., y Adell, J. (2021). Tecnologías digitales y cambio educativo. Una aproximación crítica. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 19(4), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.4.005
Ballardini, R.M., He K., Roos, T. (2019). AI-generated content: authorship and inventorship in the age of artificial intelligence. In: Pihlajarinne, T., Vesala, J., Honkkila, O. (eds) Online distribution of content in the EU. https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/ttonteri/pub/aicontent2018.pdf
Boddington, P. (2017). Does AI Raise Any Distinctive Ethical Questions?. In: Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60648-4_3
Buber, M. (2017). Yo y tú (Trad. Carlos Díaz Hernández). Herder. (Trabajo original publicado en 1923)
Castelvecchi, D. (2016). Can we open the black box of AI? Nature, 538(7623), 21-23.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2013). Human Being @ Risk: Enhancement, Technology, and the Evaluation of Vulnerability Transformations. Springer.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2021). Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial. Cátedra.
Desmurget, M. (2022). La fábrica de cretinos digitales. Booket.
Domingos, P. (2015). The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World. Allen Lane.
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., y Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of big data: Evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
Dubber, M. D., Pasquale, F., & Das, S. (Eds.). (2020). The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI. Oxford University Press.
Ellul, J. (1977). Le système technicien. Calmann-Lévy.
Esquirol, J. M. (2012). Los filósofos contemporáneos y la técnica. Gedisa.
European Commission AI HLEG (High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence). (2019, April 8). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
Ferrario, A., Loi, M., y Viganò, E. (2020). In AI we trust incrementally: A multi-layer model of trust to analyze human-artificial intelligence interactions. Philosophy y Technology, 33, 523-539.
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... y Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.
Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital labour and Karl Marx. Routledge.
Fenwick M, Jurcys P (2023) Originality and the future of copyright in an age of generative AI. Comput Law Secur Rev Int J Technol Law Pract. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105892
Gros, B. y Rodríguez Illera, J. L.. (1991). Inteligencia artificial y diseño de programas educativos. Revista Española de pedagogía, 49(188), 39-57.
Habermas, J. (2003). La ética del discurso y la cuestión de la verdad. Paidós.
Han, B-C. (2021). No-cosas. Quiebras del mundo de hoy. Taurus.
Hutson, J. (2024). Rethinking Plagiarism in the Era of Generative AI. Journal of Intelligent Communication, 4(1), 20-31.
Heidegger, M. (1989). Serenidad (Trad. Yves Zimmermann). Ediciones del Serbal. (Trabajo original publicado en 1960).
Heidegger, M. (1997). Filosofía, ciencia y técnica.. Editorial Universitaria.
Heidegger, M. (2000). Carta sobre el humanismo (Trad. Helena Cortés y Arturo Leyte). Alianza. (Trabajo original publicado en 1947).
Heidegger, M. (2023). Ser y tiempo (Trad. Jorge Eduardo Rivera C.). Trotta. (Trabajo original publicado en 1927).
Jonas, H. (1995). El principio de responsabilidad: Ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica. Herder.
Jover Olmeda, G. (1991). Relación educativa y relaciones humanas. Herder.
Kant, I. (2005). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Tecnos. (Trabajo original publicado ca. 1785)
Koshiyama, A., Kazim, E., Treleaven, P., Rai, P., Szpruch, L., Pavey, G., ... & Chatterjee, S. (2024). Towards algorithm auditing: managing legal, ethical and technological risks of AI, ML and associated algorithms. Royal Society Open Science, 11(5), 230859.
Larsson, S., y Heintz, F. (2020). Transparency in artificial intelligence. Internet Policy Review, 9(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.2.1469
Nassif, R. (1980). Teoría de la Educación. Problemática pedagógica contemporánea. Editorial Cincel.
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., et al. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4221–4241). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Obaigbena, A., Lottu, O. A., Ugwuanyi, E. D., Jacks, B. S., Sodiya, E. O., & Daraojimba, O. D. (2024). AI and human-robot interaction: A review of recent advances and challenges. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(2), 321-330.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (2004). Meditación de la técnica y otros ensayos sobre ciencia y filosofía. Alianza. (Trabajo original publicado en 1933).
Pizarro, R. (2021). La filosofía de la técnica en Éric Sadin: La técnica como un régimen numérico de verdad. Argumentos de Razón Técnica, 24, 116-141.
Platón (1988). Fedro. Editorial Gredos. (Trabajo original publicado s.f.))
Pose, C. (2023). Humanismo, transhumanismo, posthumanismo: ¿hacia la era de la inteligencia artificial? Eidon, 60, 79-94.
Prohaska, L. (1981). Pedagogía del encuentro. Editorial Herder.
Reiss, M. J. (2021). The use of AI in education: Practicalities and ethical considerations. London Review of Education, 19(1), 5, 1–14
Riechmann, J. (2014). Un buen encaje en los ecosistemas. Segunda edición (revisada) de Biomímesis. Los libros de la Catarata.
Salvagno. M., Taccone, F.S., Gerli, A.G. (2023). Artifcial intelligence hallucinations. Critical Care, 27, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04473-y
Sandel, M. (2011). Justicia: ¿hacemos lo que debemos? Debate.
Sadin, E. (2018). La humanidad aumentada: La administración digital del mundo. Caja Negra.
Sadin, E. (2020). La inteligencia artificial o el desafío del siglo: Anatomía de un antihumanismo radical. Caja Negra.
Scavino, D. (2022). Máquinas filosóficas. Anagrama.
Taddeo, M. (2010). Modelling trust in artificial agents, a first step toward the analysis of e-trust. Minds and Machines, 20(2), 243-257.
Terrones, A. L. (2020). La actualidad del concepto sobrenaturaleza de José Ortega y Gasset: Una mirada desde la inteligencia artificial. Análisis. Revista Colombiana de Humanidades, 96(52), 165-175.
Touriñán, J. M. (2019). La relación educativa es un concepto con significado propio que requiere concordancia entre valores y sentimientos en cada interacción. Sophia, 26, 223-279.
Tronto, J.C. (1993). Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
Véliz, C. (2021). Moral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agents. AI y society, 36(2), 487-497.
Véliz, C. (Ed.) (2023). Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Vigotski, L. S. (2001). Psicología pedagógica : un curso breve (Trad. G. Blanck). Aique Grupo Editor. (Trabajo original publicado en 1926).
Vigotski, L. S. (2007). Pensamiento y habla (Trad. A. A. González); Ed; Colihue. (Trabajo original publicado en 1934).
Vigotski, L. S. (2018). Sete aulas de L. S. Vigotski sobre os fundamentos da pedologia (Trad. Z. Prestes y E. Tunes). E-Papers. (Trabajo original publicado en 1934).
Zourez, L. (2024). Technology as a Mediator between the Teacher and the Learner in Fostering Educational Interaction. Journal of Languages and Translation, 4(1), 100-109.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Antonio Lovato Sagrado, Raúl Arango Pérez, Eric Ortega González, Laura Fontán de Bedout
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- The texts published in Digital Education Review, DER, are under a license Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4,0 Spain, of Creative Commons. All the conditions of use in: Creative Commons,
- In order to mention the works, you must give credit to the authors and to this Journal.
- Digital Education Review, DER, does not accept any responsibility for the points of view and statements made by the authors in their work.
