Un modelo de cocreación de evaluación en entornos de aprendizaje mejorados por la tecnología en la educación superior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2024.45.204-213Palabras clave:
evaluación, co-creación, modelo, educación superior, TELEResumen
Este artículo presenta una investigación basada en diseño participativo que tuvo como objetivo crear un modelo de cocreación en el currículo en entornos de aprendizaje mejorados por tecnología (TELE) en educación terciaria, específicamente para codiseñar la evaluación entre profesores y estudiantes. Esta investigación cualitativa siguió cuatro fases divididas en cinco etapas con dos ciclos iterativos de diseño y rediseño. En consecuencia, se utilizó un enfoque de métodos mixtos para recopilar los datos: revisión sistemática de la literatura, entrevistas semiestructuradas y encuestas a estudiantes. Como resultado, el modelo destaca y distingue cuatro dimensiones diferentes: caracterización, cocreación, reflexión y tecnología. Las tres dimensiones iniciales se representan en orden cronológico, mientras que la cuarta dimensión está presente en todas las etapas precedentes. Además, describimos cómo la tecnología está presente en todo el proceso de cocreación, delineando claramente su papel en cada dimensión. En conclusión, este modelo amplía la base de la cocreación en la literatura curricular y proporciona herramientas para que los profesionales innoven en sus contextos académicos, permitiendo la participación de los estudiantes en su propio viaje de aprendizaje a través de la cocreación. Es necesario realizar más investigaciones en este campo, por lo que pretendemos aplicar esta investigación a otros campos de estudio y niveles, contextos y situaciones educativas.
Citas
Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers & Education, 115, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014
Blau, I., & Shamir‐Inbal, T. (2017). Digital technologies for promoting “student voice” and co-creating learning experience in an ac-ademic course. Instructional Science, 46(2), 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9436-y
Bombaerts, G., Doulougeri, K., Tsui, S., Laes, E., Spahn, A., & Martin, D. A. (2021). Engineering students as co-creators in an ethics of technology course. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(4), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00326-5
Bovill, C., and Bulley, C.J. (2011) A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility. In: Rust, C. Improving Student Learning (18). Oxford Brookes University: Oxford Practices: Institutional, Disciplinary and Cultural Variations. Series: (ed.) Improving Student Learning (ISL) 18: Global Theories and Local Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford, pp. 176-188. ISBN 9781873576809
Bovill, C. (2019). A co-creation of learning and teaching typology: What kind of co-creation are you planning or doing? International Journal For Students As Partners, 3(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i2.3953
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79(6), 1023-1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
Deeley, S.J. & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assess-ment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3): 463–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
Clarke, S., Masters, A., Collins, B., Flynn, D., & Arnab, S. (2020, Sep-tember). Using frugal education principles and the RPG Mak-er MV game engine to aid the co-creation of digital game-based learning resources. In Proceedings of the 14th Interna-tional Conference on Game Based Learning, ECGBL (pp. 87-95).
Chemi, T., & Krogh, L. (2017). Co-Creation in Higher Education: Students and Educators Preparing Creatively and Collaboratively to the Challenge of the Future. Springer.
De Koning, J. I., Crul, M. R., & Wever, R. (2016, May). Models of co-creation. In Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes. 2016 Conference (No. 125, pp. 266-278). Linköping University Electronic Press.
Dollinger, M., Lodge, J., & Coates, H. (2018). Co-creation in higher education: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 210-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1466756
Dollinger, M., Liu, D., Arthars, N. & Lodge, J. M. (2019). Working togeth-er in learning analytics towards the co-creation of value. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.2
Doyle, E., & Buckley, P. (2020). The impact of co-creation: an analysis of the effectiveness of stu-dent authored multiple choice questions on achievement of learning outcomes. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1777166
Doyle, E., Buckley, P. & McCarthy, B. (2020): The impact of content co-creation on academic achievement, Assessment & Evalua-tion in Higher Education, http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1782832
Durall Gazulla, E., Bauters, M., Hietala, I., Leinonen, T., & Kapros, E. (2020). Co-creation and co-de- sign in technology-enhanced learning: Innovating science learning outside the classroom. Id&a interaction design & architecture(s), (42), 202-226. http://www.mifav.uniroma2.it/inevent/ events/idea2010/doc/42_10.pdf
Gómez-Ruiz, M.A., & Quesada Serra, V. (2020). Análisis de las califica-ciones compartidas en la modalidad participativa de la eva-luación colaborativa entre docente y estudiantes. RELIEVE, 26(1), art. M6. http://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.16567
González-Yebra, O., Aguilar, M. A., Aguilar, F., & Lucas, M. (2019). Co-Design of a 3D Virtual Campus for Synchronous Distance Teaching Based on Student Satisfaction: Experience at the University of Almería (Spain). Education Sciences, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010021
Gros, B., (2019). La investigación sobre el diseño participativo de entor-nos digitales de aprendizaje. Universidad de Barcelona, 1-70. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24298.06087
Healey, M, Flint, A & Harrington, K. 2014. Engagement through partner-ship: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy. https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5176/
Hernández-Sampieri, R. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill México.
Higgins, D., Dennis, A., Stoddard, A., Maier, A. G., & Howitt, S. (2019). ‘Power to empower’: con- ceptions of teaching and learning in a pedagogical co-design partnership. Higher Education Re-search & Development, 38, 1154–1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1621270
Hyysalo, S., Perikangas, S., Marttila, T., &Auvinen, K. (2019). Intermedi-ate Codesigning in Transitions Governance: Catalysing and Channelling Participant Action. The Design Journal, 22(6), 873–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1661557
Jensen, K., & Bennett, L. (2016). Enhancing teaching and learning through dialogue: A student and staff partnership model. In-ternational Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1113537
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The Teacher as Designer: Pedagogy in the New Media Age. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.200
Könings, K. D., Bovill, C., & Woolner, P. (2017). Towards an interdisci-plinary model of practice for participatory building design in education. European Journal of Education, 52(3), 306-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12230
Könings, K. D., Mordang, S., Smeenk, F. & Stassen, L. (2020). Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Medical Teacher, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838464
Manrique-Losada & Martínez-Sanz, R. (2022). Cuando la Innovación Docente Despierta Vocaciones. Efectos del Aprendizaje Co-laborativo en Estudiantes Universitarios de Comunicación Organizacional. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Re-search, 12(2), 171-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.447/remie.6583
McFaul, H., FitzGerald, E., Byrne, D., & Ryan, F. (2020). A mobile app for public legal education: a case study of co-designing with students. Research in Learning Technology, 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2434
Pee, L. G. (2020). Enhancing the learning effectiveness of ill-structured problem solving with online co-creation. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2341-2355.
Raposo-Rivas, M., & de la Serna, M. C. (2019). Technology to improve the assessment of learning. Digital Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2019.35.%25p
Salinas, J & De-Benito, B. 2020. Construction of personalized learning pathways through mixed methods. Comunicar, 28(65): 99–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-03
Sanders, E. B.-N. & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Santana-Martel, J. S., & Pérez-i-Garcias, A. (2020). El codiseño educati-vo haciendo uso de las TIC en educación superior: una revi-sión sistemática de literatura. Revista Electrónica de Tecno-logía Educativa. Edutec, 74, 25–51. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.74.1799
Santana-Martel, J. S. and Pérez-Garcias, A. (2022a). Students’ Agency and Self-Regulated Skills through the Lenses of Assessment Co-creation in Post-COVID-19 Online and Blended Settings: A Multi-Case Study. Journal of Interactive Media in Educa-tion, X(X): X, pp. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.746
Santana-Martel, J.S. & Pérez-Garcias, A. (2022b). Co-creating rubrics: students’ perspective on their process and the product de-signed in technology-enhanced learning environments In J. M. Esteve & A. Fernández (Ed.), Transformando la educación a través del conocimiento (2022). Editorial Octaedro.
Santana-Martel, J. S., & Garcías, A. P. (2023). Cocreación de la Evalua-ción Mediada por Tecnología en Educación Superior: Pers-pectiva Docente. Revista Fuentes, 183-193. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2023.22222
Santana-Martel, J. S., Lizana, A. L., y Moreno-García, J. (In Press). Beneficios y desafíos del proceso de codiseño de la evalua-ción en educación superior desde el punto de vista del pro-fesorado. En B. De-Benito, O. Agudelo, A. Lizana, y A. Pérez-Garcias (Eds.), Propuestas educativas transformadoras me-diante codiseño educativo e itinerarios de aprendizaje en en-tornos digitales. Dykinson.
Silva, Solano-Fernández, I., García-Tudela, P., & Sánchez-Vera, M. (2021). The Use of Facebook in Higher Education: Analysis of the Relationship Between Participation and Subject Marks. Digital Educational Review, (40). https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2021.40.1-16
Suliman, S., Könings, K. D., Allen, M., Al-Moslih, A., Carr, A., & Koopmans, R. P. (2022). Sailing the boat together: Co-creation of a model for learning during transition. Medical Teacher, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2118037
Reyna, J., & Meier, P. (2020). Co-Creation of Knowledge Using Mobile Technologies and Digital Media as Pedagogical Devices in Undergraduate STEM Education. Research in Learning Tech-nology, 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2356
Thompson, J., Couzner, L., & Houston, D. (2020). Assessment partner-ships from the start: Building reflective practice as a begin-ning paramedic student competency. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 17. https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.17.750
Uskoković, V. (2018). Flipping the flipped: the co-creational classroom. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0077-9
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in human behavior, 72, 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
Villatoro, S., & de Benito, B. (2021). An Approach to Co-Design and Self-Regulated Learning in Technological Environments. System-atic Review. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Re-search, 10(2), 234-250. http://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.646
Villatoro, S & de-Benito, B. 2022. Self-Regulation of Learning and the Co-Design of Personalized Learning Pathways in Higher Ed-ucation: A Theoretical Model Approach. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2022(1): 6, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.749
Walters, S., Silva, P., & Nikolai, J. (2017). Teaching, Learning, and Assessment: Insights into Students’ Motivation to Learn. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2777
Wareing, L., Rodgers, P. A., &Dunn, N. (2019). Co-designing Pathways to Opportunities for Young People in the North West of Eng-land. The Design Journal, 22, 863–883. https://doi.org/10 .1080/14606925.2019.1595405
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Jennifer Saray Santana Martel, Adolfina Pérez Garcias
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El/la autor/a que publica en esta revista está de acuerdo con los términos siguientes:
- El/la autor/a conserva los derechos de autoría y otorga a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de la obra
- Los textos publicados en Digital Education Review están bajo una licencia Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 3.0 España de Creative Commons.
- Para poder mencionar los trabajos se debe citar la fuente (DER) y el autor del texto.
- Digital Education Review (DER) no acepta ninguna responsabilidad por los puntos de vista y las declaraciones hechas por los autores en su trabajo.
