Español
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2023.27.40732Keywords:
españolAbstract
In Mexico, the autonomy of public universities is a constitutional principle which aims at safeguarding their essential liberties. This, in turn, has been guaranteed through the establishment of university courts which can solve conflicts originated within their own scope. In our view, this generates relevant questions for legal theory, especially regarding the overlap of autonomy and legal pluralism.
In this article, the method chosen is the critical reconstruction of concepts. Its results regard the identification of university courts within contemporary theories of legal pluralism. Its structure is the following: First, stock is taken of the state of the art regarding a concept of legal pluralism, considering its theoretical commitments, its conceptual history, and its analytic features. Second, the University Court of Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexico (UABC) is considered through legal pluralism, discussing the Mexican constitutional principle of the autonomy of universities along with its interface norms, incorporating general aspects of university jurisdiction, and analyzing the material scope of competences of the the University Court of UABC. The conclusion draws a concise summary and implications regarding the autonomy of universities, highlighting the increase of attributions entailed by the protection and promotion of human rights.
References
ARISTÓTELES. (1988). Política. Gredos (trad. de Manuela García Valdés).
ALEXY. R. (2014). Principios formales. Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, (37), pp. 15-29. https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA2014.37.01
ALTHUSIUS, J. (1961 [1614]). Politics Methodically Set Forth, and Illustrated with Sacred and Profane Examples. En CARNEY, F. S., (ed.), The Politics of Johannes Althusius. Beacon Press.
ANIDJAR, L. (2022). Corporate Law and Governance Pluralism. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence. 35 (2), 283-320. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2022.12
BLACKSTONE, W. (1765). Commentaries on the laws of England. Clarendon Press.
CABALLERO LOIS, C. Y BASTOS JÚNIOR, L. M. (2017). Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo?. Revista Derecho del Estado. (40), 127–151. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n40.06.
CASTRO CORIA, E. G. y CASTRO CORIA, J. P. (2022). Castro Coria, E. G., & Castro Coria, J. P. . (2022). Pluralidad democrática al interior de las Universidades Públicas Autónomas en México. Revista De Educación Y Derecho, (26). https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2022.26.40209
COVER, R. (2002). Nomos y narración. En Cover, R. Derecho, narración y violencia. Gedisa.
COX, J. (2015). Trials and Tribulations: The Cambridge University Courts, 1540-1660. Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society. 15 (4) 595-623.
CROCE, M. y GOLDONI, M (2020). The Legacy of Pluralism. Stanford University Press.
ENCINAS, G. (2021). La teoría alexiana de los principios y dos concepciones de la democracia Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, (44). 377-407. https://doi.org/10.14198/ DOXA2021.44.15
ENCINAS, G. (2022). Interlegal Balancing: A Concept, Two Contexts, Some Circumstances. Rivista di filosofia del diritto. 11 (1): 75-90, https://doi.org/10.4477/104018
ENGLE MERRY, S. (1988). Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review. 22 (5): 869-896, https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638
FIORAVANTI, M. (2001). Constitución: De la Antigüedad a nuestros días. Trotta.
FLEMATE DÍAZ, P., NORZAGARAY NORZAGARAY, A., y SÁNCHEZ SÁNCHEZ, A., (2021). El derecho a la educación superior en México, en la cuarta transformación, desde una perspectiva transdisciplinaria. En
VÁZQUEZ GARCÍA, J., et al. (coords.), Estudios transdisciplinares y educación: Perspectivas desde sus actores. CPEI, UABC.
GALGANO, F. (2004). El concepto de persona jurídica. Revista Derecho del Estado. (16), 13–28. https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/783
GENTIL GONZÁLES, C. (2013). Gobernar la universidad desde la autonomía. Revista de Educación y Derecho. (7) https://doi.org/10.1344/re&d.v0i07.5864
VON GIERKE, O. (1868). Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht. Weidmann.
GRIFFITHS, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism?. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law. 24 (18): 1-55, https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
GRIFFITHS, J. (2017). What is sociology of law? (On law, rules, social control and sociology). The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law. 49 (2): 93-142, https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2017.1340057
GUASTINI, R. (2016). La sintaxis del derecho. Marcial Pons (trad. de Álvaro Núñez Vaquero).
HERBERT, L. R. (2018). Die akademische Gerichtsbarkeit der Universität Heidelberg. Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg, doi: https://doi.org/10.11588/heibooks.348.481
HERNÁNDEZ, M. (2021). Convenio con once universidades para erradicar la violencia. Gaceta UNAM, 6 de mayo de 2021, disponible para su consulta en: https://www.gaceta.unam.mx/convenio-con-once-universidades-para-erradicar-la-violencia/
KRISCH, N. (2021). Framing Entangled Legalities beyond the State. En KRISCH, N. (ed.), Entangled Legalities beyond the State. Cambridge University Press, 21 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914642
LASKI, H. (1919). The Pluralistic State. The Philosophical Review. 28 (6): 562-575.
LÓPEZ DE SOSOAGA LÓPEZ DE ROBLES, A. (2014). El método interpretativo de Von Savigny en el análisis de la legislación educativa: un estudio de casos sobre el currículo de Primaria. Revista de Educación y Derecho, (9). https://doi.org/10.1344/re&d.v0i9.10503
LOZADA, A. (2022). Principios formales y sentido común jurídico. Sobre la presunción de constitucionalidad de la ley. Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho. (45) 411-443. https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA2022.45.14
MACCORMICK, N. (1999). Questioning Sovereignty. Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268765.001.0001
MICHAELS, R. (2009). Global Legal Pluralism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 5: 243-262 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172311
MUÑÍZ FRATICELLI, V. M. (2014). The Structure of Pluralism. Oxford University Press.
NICKEL, R. (2015). Interlegalidad. Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad. 8: 205-211.
PALOMBELLA, G. (2016). The Rule of Law at Home and Abroad. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law. 8 (1): 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-016-0024-z
PALOMBELLA, G. (2019). “Formats” of Law and their Intertwining. En
KLABBERS, J. y PALOMBELLA, G. (eds.), The Challenge of Inter-Legality. Cambridge University Press pp. 23-41, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108609654.002
PALOMBELLA, G. (2022). Exploring the Rationale of Inter-Legality. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, 11 (1): 9-26, https://doi.org/10.4477/104014
RAZ, J. (2017). Why the State?. En ROUGHAN, N. y HALPIN, A. eds., (2017). In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence. Cambridge University Press: 136-162, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875056.007
REINA GARCÍA, Ó. M. (2012). Las cláusulas de apertura o reenvío hacia fuentes externas previstas en la Constitución colombiana, como criterio para delimitar el contenido del bloque de constitucionalidad. Revista Derecho del Estado. (29) 175-214 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/3296
ROUGHAN, N. y HALPIN, A. eds., (2017). In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence. Cambridge University Press.
ROUSSEAU, J. J. (1796 [1761]). Du contrat social, ou principes du droit politique. Gerard Fleischer.
ROMANO, S. (1967). L’ordinamento giuridico. Sansoni.
RUNCIMAN, D. (1997). Pluralism and the Personality of the State. Cambridge University Press.
SCHIFF BERMAN, P. (2020). Understanding Global Legal Pluralism: From Local to Global, from Descriptive to Normative. En
SCHIFF BERMAN, P. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.16
SÓFOCLES. (1981). Tragedias. Gredos (trad. de Assela Alamillo).
SANTOS. B. de S. (1987). Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law. Journal of Law and Society. 14 (3): 279-302, https://doi.org/10.2307/1410186
SEINECKE, R. (2015). Das Recht des Rechtspluralismus. Mohr Siebeck.
SEINECKE, R. (2020). Die deutschsprachige Rechtswissenschaft seit 1800 und der Rechtspluralismus. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung. 137 (1): 272-363. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgg-2020-0005
TAMANAHA, B. Z. (2019). The Promise and Conundrums of Pluralist Jurisprudence. Modern Law Review. 82 (1): 159-179 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12393
DE LA TORRE LÓPEZ, J. M. (2021). La expulsión de estudiantes y el derecho a la instrucción en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Revista De Educación Y Derecho, (1 Extraordinario), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2021.1EXT.37694
VALENCIA-TELLO, D. C. (2020). Pluralismo jurídico. Análisis de tiempos históricos. Revista Derecho del Estado. (45) 121-154 https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n45.05
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gabriel Alejandro Encinas Duarte, Paola Lizett Flemate Díaz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. AUTHORS RETAIN COPYRIGHT. CREATIVE COMMONS
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- Texts will be published under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, provided they include an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship, its initial publication in this journal and the terms of the license.
