Comparison of second language teaching methods: The need to assess the motivation of pupils taught with Teaching Proficiency through Reading and Storytelling (TPRS) and the traditional method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/reire.42155

Keywords:

teaching method, first foreign language, motivation for studies, teaching style, teaching aid

Abstract

This article briefly reviews the history and framework of two of the most commonly-used language teaching methods in classrooms in the United States: the TPRS method and the “traditional” grammar-based method. The comparison centres on the pupils’ motivation to learn the second language/target language (L2). While previous studies have measured and analysed the connection between various factors related to the teacher, teaching style, classroom materials and student motivation and performance, more research is needed in order to determine whether the method of teaching a second language (specifically, the TPRS method and the “traditional” grammar-based method) correlates with student motivation to learn the L2.

Author Biography

Adam Groshong, Marin Catholic High School (California, EE UU)

Profesor de español. Jefe del departamento de World Language.

References

Alcalde-Mato, N. (2011). Principales Métodos de Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras en Alemania. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 6, 9-23. https://doi.org/ddtdsn

Asher, J. (2000). Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher’s guide book (6.ª ed.). Sky Oaks.

Bernaus, M., y Gardner, R. C. (2008). Teacher motivation strategies, student perceptions, student motivation, and English achievement. Modern Language Journal, 92(3), 387-401. https://doi.org/dvsqtg

Demirezen, M. (2014). Cognitive-Code Learning Theory and Foreign Language Learning Relations. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 1(5), 309–317. https://tinyurl.com/4t84rudy

Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and Motivating in the Foreign Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284. https://doi.org/bg5q6h

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/czrdcd

Dziedzic, J. (2012). A Comparison of TPRS and Traditional Instruction, both with SSR. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, March, 5-6. https://tinyurl.com/3eb39att

Gardner, R. C. (2004). Attitude/Motivation Test Battery: International AMTB Research Project. https://tinyurl.com/58hrmxw6

Gardner, R. C. (2005). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition [Ponencia]. Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics/Canadian Linguistics Association. https://tinyurl.com/4usz5ksk

Gardner, R. C. (2007). Motivation and Second Language Acquisition. Porta Linguarum, 8, 9-20. https://doi.org/j22q

Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model. Peter Lang.

Hedstrom, B. (2012). The Basics of TPRS: TPRS Workshop Notes and Pre-Reading. https://tinyurl.com/yckz47z9

Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning [ebook]. https://tinyurl.com/576brn37

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition [ebook]. https://tinyurl.com/42r5v3u8

Krashen, S. (2015, 13 de julio). Another Nail in the Skill-Building Coffin [blog]. T.P.R.S. Q&A. https://tinyurl.com/bdhkph83

Lightbown, P., y Spada, N. M. (2006). How languages are learned (3.a ed.). Oxford University Press.

Mallart-i-Navarra, J. (2009). Fonamentació i didàctica de la motivació a l’àmbit de les llengües. Revista Catalana de Pedagogia, 6, 105-129.

Merinnage-De-Costa, R. S. (2015). Traditional Methods Versus TPRS: Effects on Introductory French Students at a Medium-Sized Public University in the Midwestern United States [Tesis de máster, Minnesota State University, Mankato]. https://tinyurl.com/yrvv6z44

Methods of Language Teaching. (s.f.). https://tinyurl.com/3v5zbu27

Noels, K. A., Clément, R., y Pelletier, L. G. (1999). Perceptions of teachers’ communicative style and students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/bctzgb

Noels, K. A., Clément, R., y Pelletier, L. G. (2001). Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Integrative Orientations of French Canadian Learners of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 57(3). https://doi.org/fbxq3r

Richards, J. C., y Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2.a ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Ryan, R., y Deci, E. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/f59m

Stribling, P. (2004). An Interview with Robert C. Gardner. SHIKEN: The JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter. 8(1), 11-21. https://tinyurl.com/4wvs6hwr

Teaching Proficiency and Reading Through Storytelling (TPRS). (s.f.). https://tinyurl.com/mwn8ajwy

Published

2023-05-31

How to Cite

Groshong, A. (2023). Comparison of second language teaching methods: The need to assess the motivation of pupils taught with Teaching Proficiency through Reading and Storytelling (TPRS) and the traditional method. REIRE Revista d’Innovació I Recerca En Educació, 16(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire.42155

Issue

Section

Studies and trends