Stimulating creativity and critical thinking at school through Robotics and Artificial Intelligence: A case study in South India.

Authors

  • Eduard Muntaner-Perich Universitat de Girona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2012.5.1515

Keywords:

Learning, Creativity, Information and communication technologies, Educational Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Development cooperation

Abstract

In the rapidly changing today's world, it is increasingly clear that success is not only based on what we know or how much we know, but in our ability to think and act creatively. Unfortunately, in most cases, traditional learning models in schools are often not focused on developing creative thinking. This problem is further accentuated in developing countries, where creativity, properly used, could become a fundamental tool to reduce poverty and to stimulate sustainable human development. This article describes a pilot project funded by the University of Girona, combining educational innovation and development cooperation, and which has been held at Shanti Bhavan, a rural school in South India. The project, based on the theory of Constructionism, consisted of several workshops where, through the Information and Communication Technologies (specifically Robotics and Artificial Intelligence), creativity and critical thinking of children were encouraged, while simultaneously and through play and exploration, a non-formal review of the most problematic subjects in rural India was conducted. The long term goal is that these children will become agents of change, creative and innovative in their own communities, and, committed to their social reality they will be able to propose new alternatives to improve their quality of life, and to implement projects to create wealth in different social fields.

Author Biography

Eduard Muntaner-Perich, Universitat de Girona

Agents Research Lab. Universitat de Girona

References

Anderson, L. W.; Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Nova York: Longman.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. Nova York: David McKay Co Inc.

Cambodia~p.r.i.d.e (2010). Providing Rural Innovative Digital Education. <http://www.cambodiapride.org/> [Consulta: octubre 2011]

Dale, E. (1954). Audio-visual methods in teaching. Nova York: Dryden.

Dias, M. B.; Mills-Tettey, G. A.; Nanayakkara, T. (2005). «Robotics, Education, and Sustainable Development». Actes de la 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 4248–4253.

Dias, M. B.; Browning, B.; Mills-Tettey, G. A.; Amanquah, N.; El-Moughny, N. (2007). «Undergraduate Robotics Education in Technologically Underserved Communities». Actes de l’IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1387-1392.

Enginycat (2010). Memòria Enginycat 2009 [en línia]. Recull de premsa. Departament d’Innovació, Universitats i Empreses. http://www.enginycat.cat/archivo/descarregues/Memoria%20Enginycat%202008-2010.pdf [Consulta: octubre 2011]

George, A. (2005). India Untouched: The Forgotten Face of Rural Poverty. Writers’ Collective.

Google (2010). Google Project 10 to the 100. <http://www.project10tothe100.com/ideas.html> [Consulta: octubre 2011]

Kozma, R.; Wagner, D. (2006). «Reaching the most disadvantaged with ICT: What works?» A: R. Sweet i D. Wagner (ed.), ICT in non-formal and adult education: Supporting out-of-school youth and adults (97-120). París: OECD.

Maloney, J.; Burd, L.; Kafai, Y.; Rusk, N.; Silverman, B.; Resnick, M. (2004). «Scratch: A Sneak Preview». Actes de la Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing, International Conference on, 104-109.

Martin, F.; Mikhak, B.; Resnick, M.; Silverman, B.; Berg, R. (2000). «To Mindstorms and Beyond: Evolution of a Construction Kit for Magical Machines». A: A. Druin i J. Hendler (ed.), Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Mills-Tettey, G. A.; Dias, M. B.; Browning, B.; Amanquah, N. (2007). «Teaching technical creativity through Robotics: A case study in Ghana». Taller sobre IA i TIC per al desenvolupament (TICD) a la 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’07).

Mukerjee, A.; Kulkarni, A.; Verma, S.; Singh, R.; Agarwal, A. (2004). «Low-Cost Interfaces for Learning Programming». Actes de la International Conference on Engineering Education Gainesville.

Muntaner-Perich, E. (2009). Blog Com gotes a l’oceà. <http://www.eduard.cat/search/label/voluntariat/> [Consulta: octubre 2011]

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Computers, Children and Powerful Ideas. Nova York: Basic Books.

Piaget, J. (1955). The Child’s Construction of Reality. Londres: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Resnick, M. (2007). «Sowing the Seeds for a More Creative Society». Learning & Leading with Technology, 35, 4, 18-22. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).

Shanti Bhavan (2010). Shanti Bhavan School, The George Foundation. <http://www.shantibhavanonline.org/> [Consulta: octubre 2011]

The LEGO Group (2007). LEGO-Mindstorms Brochure. <http://www.lego.com/education/download/LME_Brochure.pdf> [Consulta: octubre 2011]

Urrea, C. (2001). «Designing Robotic Artifacts: Rural School-Community Collaboration for Learning». Thinkcycle workshop. Boston.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2012-01-09

How to Cite

Muntaner-Perich, E. (2012). Stimulating creativity and critical thinking at school through Robotics and Artificial Intelligence: A case study in South India. REIRE Revista d’Innovació I Recerca En Educació, 5(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2012.5.1515

Issue

Section

Innovation articles