The Consultants' Fair: An active learning pedagogical methodology for large groups
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2018.11.220677Keywords:
Active learning methods, Oral presentation competencies, Case study, Learning by doing, Learning by teaching, Large groupsAbstract
INTRODUCTION - This study provides empirical evidence of how active learning methodologies contribute to developing students’ competencies and improving their satisfaction in large classroom settings. The study examines two group-based methodologies: i) «You be the Consultant» (a case study project in which participants analyse an organizational challenge and suggest strategic solutions); and ii) the «Consultants’ Fair» (an active learning methodology to pool the group project). METHODS - We used a longitudinal research design with a sample of 250 students (50 teams). We collected data at two points while students were completing their projects. Students self-assessed their characteristics, competencies, and satisfaction. The dependent variable (team performance) was collected from various sources. RESULTS - Our findings reveal that satisfaction mediates the relationship between individual differences (self-assessed competencies, conscientiousness, and self-efficacy) and team results. Furthermore, qualitative feedback provides evidence of the fast learning curve for competencies. DISCUSSION - The «Consultants’ Fair» promotes practice-based training, in which students are given time to practice their competencies. In terms of class dynamics and due to the learning by teaching methodology, the use of time is more efficient because students practise competencies simultaneously and consecutively. The initial strain of talking in front of an audience disappears gradually as students repeat their speech to their «visitors» consecutively; this is «learning by doing».References
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., Lovett, M. C., Di Pietro, M., Norman, M. K., et al. (2010). How learning works. Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Arnaiz, P., & Guillen, F. (2012). Foreign language anxiety in Spanish university settings: Interpersonal differences. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 17, 5-26. Retrieved from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=17523162003
Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 4, 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
Barkley, E. F., Major, C. H., & Cross, K. P. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance. A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
Baruch, Y., & Peiperl, M. A. (2000). The impact of an MBA on graduates' career. Human Resource Management Journal, 10, 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2000.tb00021.x
Biggs, J. B. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. UK: McGraw-Hill Education
Burgoyne, J., & Mumford, A. (2001). Learning from the case method: A report to the European Case Clearing House. European Case Clearing House. Retrieved from: http://www.thecasecentre.org/files/downloads/reserach /RP0301M.pdf
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction -A growing global phenomenon. Retrieved from: https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/e484_emi_-_cover_option_3 _final_web.pdf
Donia, M., O'Neill, T. A., & Brutus, S. (2015). Peer feedback increases team member performance, confidence and work outcomes: A longitudinal study. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2015, No. 1, p. 12560). Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2015.21
Feden, P. D. (2012). Teaching without telling: Contemporary pedagogical theory put into practice. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 23(3), 5-23.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546
Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2013). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14, 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467123
Hannan, A., & Silver, H. (2000). Innovating in Higher Education: Teaching, learning and institutional cultures. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530-541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376-407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376
Lueg, K., & Lueg, R. (2015). Why do students choose English as a medium of instruction? A Bourdieusian perspective on the study strategies of non-native English speakers. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14, 5-30. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0009
Mackinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
Morgeson, F. P., Reider, M. H., & Campion, M. A. (2005). Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel psychology, 58, 583-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.655.x
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Rolls, J. A. (1998). Facing the fears associated with professional speaking. Business Communication Quarterly, 61, 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/108056999806100213
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 124(2), 240-261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
Wassermann, S. (1994). Introduction to Case Method Teaching. A Guide to the Galaxy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Witt L. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Social skills as moderator of the conscientiousness-performance relationship: Convergence evidence across four studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 809-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.809
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors keep authorship rights and confer to REIRE the rights of article’s first publication.
All the contents included into REIRE Revista d’innovació i Recerca en Educació are under Creative Commons 4.0 International license attribution, which allows the article’s reproduction, distribution and public communication, whenever authorship and the journal’s title is quoted.