From Densely Filled Vistas to Empty Piazzas. City Images Interpreting the Oscillating Dynamisms of Urban Reality
Keywords:representations of cities, dense cityscapes, empty cities, aesthetics of urbanity
Cities have been inspirational for the creators of visual art works long since, first as mere secondary, additional motifs to indicate the “urban” environment of the main scene, then as subject-matters in their own right. Those images could depict both imaginary and actual cities of the past and of the future, including mythological and Biblical locations, documenting distant lands and fantasizing on the appearance of utopian cities. In some of these aspects, the history of city representations shares significant similarities with the history of landscape depictions.
In the present paper, however, I aim to focus on a curious and particular detail in this pictorial tradition. Following and further investigating a brief reflection by Michel Makarius from his 2004 book on Ruins, I would like to compare the visuality and aesthetic effects of dense and empty cityscapes, of which two classical examples could be the capriccios – imaginary views of cities completely filled with aesthetically pleasing elements, including magnificent remnants of the Antique heritage – and representations of cities in which their emptiness is highlighted to such extent that the observer tends to assume that the real subject-matter of the image is not the city, its buildings, forms and physical components but exactly its being “empty”.
These “extremities” on the broad range of cityscapes, i.e., the densely-filled and the extremely depopulated are, however, not merely historical sub-genres of long-gone centuries. These typologies have survived to this day, in various versions and with diverse accents; what’s more, they seem to be more relevant than ever in understanding not only the nature of these artistic representations and their aesthetic references, but also in learning more of our contemporary reality itself. It is enough to think of the numerous ways in which artists approach the convoluted issues and challenges of urban life today, with the classical references and visual vocabulary in mind, either unconsciously creating occasional parallels or using them as explicit forerunners to their own works. The density of the global megapolises are represented in artistically novel ways often with socially critical overtones, while the images of empty cities – not long ago, for example, during the recent pandemics and lockdowns – are again resulting in aesthetically inspiring and insightful works incentivizing us to reflect on the oscillating dynamisms of our present urban realities. Therefore, it is particularly beneficial to observe such renderings of our cities and hence to raise more our awareness of the multiple global issues that are often very strongly manifested in the everyday life in large metropolises. Pieces of art thematising the extreme forms of city life can become very efficient ways of constantly reminding us of our duties of taking care of both our cities and our life.
ANDRZEJEWSKI, Adam – SALWA, Mateusz (2020A). The Ontology of Landscapes. Rivista di estetica 75 (3/2020), LX, 164-183.
ANDRZEJEWSKI, Adam – SALWA, Mateusz (2020B). What is an Urban Atmosphere? Contemporary Aesthetics Special Volume 8 (2020) Urban Aesthetics https://contempaesthetics.org/2020/07/16/what-is-an-urban-atmosphere/ (accessed: 31 March, 2021)
BALDACCI, Paolo (1989). “De Chirico and Savinio: The Theory and Iconography of Metaphysical Painting.” In: Emily Braun (ed.) Italian Art in the 20th Century. Painting and Sculpture 1900-1989, Munich: Prestel Verlag and London: Royal Academy of Arts, 61-70.
BENJAMIN, Walter (2006). “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility.” Trans. Edmund Jephcott and Harry Zohn. In: Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings (eds.) Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Vol. 3. 1935-1938, Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, (orig. 1936), 101-133.
BUSCH, Werner (1996). “Die Wahrheit des Capriccio: die Lüge der Vedute.” In: Ekkehard Mai (ed). Das Capriccio als Kunstprinzip. Milan: Skira, 95-101.
CONRAD, Peter (1999). Modern Times, Modern Places. Life & Art in the 20th Century. London: Themes & Hudson.
ERDEMCI, Fulya (2014). Mom, am I barbarian? 13th Istanbul Biennial Book. Istanbul: Istanbul Foundation for Culture and Arts.
ERDEMCI, Fulya (2016). Unlocking the Joints of the Real. https://www.maiderlopez.com/textos/fulya-erdemci-2016/?lang=en (accessed: 31 March, 2021)
HIRSH, Sharon L. (2004). Symbolism and modern urban society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LI, Christina (2013). “Cinthia Marcelle and Tiago Macha Matado.” In: Liz Erçevik Amado (ed.): Guide to the 13th Istanbul biennial. Istanbul: Istanbul Foundation for Culture and Arts / Yapı Kredı Publications, 80-83.
MAKARIUS, Michel (1996). Ruins. Paris: Flammarion, 2004.
MCGUIRK, Justin (2020). Space Unleashed. e-flux journal, 14 April, 2020, https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/at-the-border/325759/space-unleashed/ (accessed: 31 March, 2021)
MELICK, Tom (2016). Jompet Kuswidananto, Frieze 181, 18 July 2016, https://www.frieze.com/article/jompet-kuswidananto-0 (accessed: 31 March, 2021)
MILANI, Raffaele (2015). L’arte della città, Bologna: Il Mulino.
NAGEL, Ivan (1987). “Piranesi: Der Mythos vom Baumeister.” In: Ivan Nagel, Gedankengänge als Lebensläufe: Versuche über das 18. Jahrhundert. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag, 25-45.
PEDROCCO, Filippo (1995). Canaletto and the Venetian Vedutisti. New York: Scala- Riverside.
REMESAR, Antoni. (2016). New Urban Decorum? Aesthetics To and Fro. In: Agnieszka Gralińska-Toborek – Wioletta Kazimierska-Jerzyk (eds.) Aesthetic Energy of the City. Experiencing Urban Art & Space. Lodz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego (Lodz University Press), 19-51.
REMESAR, Antoni – RÍOS, Marien. (2018). Barcelona s. XVIII, un paisaje en construcción. Bases apar el espacio público. On the W@terfront Public Art. Urban Design. Civic Participation. Urban Regeneration, 60(1), 9-77
REMESAR, Antoni (2020). From drinking fountains to promenades. Water as artistic medium? On the W@terfront. Public Art. Urban Design. Civic Participation. Urban Regeneration, 62(1), 3-84.
REMESAR, Antoni (2021). Views of the city and views in the city (Preface). In: Rosa M. Vives. Trilogy about several urban view and landscape prints. Barcelona: Publicacions i Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona, 3-7.
ROLFE, Emily (2016). “An Interview with Jompet Kuswidananto.” In: Julie Rose (ed.) Jompet Kuswidananto. After Voices. Sydney: Sherman Contemporary Art Foundation, 25-31.
SCHMIED, Wieland (1989). “De Chirico, Metaphysical Painting and the International Avant-garde: Twelve Theses.” In: Emily Braun (ed.) Italian Art in the 20th Century. Painting and Sculpture 1900-1989, Munich: Prestel Verlag and London: Royal Academy of Arts, 71-80.
SCHREINER, Dénes (2020). Tragikus Voyeur. Filozófiai Kísérletek, Budapest: Uránia – L’Harmattan.
SIMMEL, Georg (1981). “The Metropolis and Mental Life.” In: Donald N. Levine (ed.) Georg Simmel. On Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 327-339.
SOMHEGYI, Zoltán. (2017). “The painter in the landscape. Aesthetic considerations on a pictorial sub-genre.” In: Zoltán Somhegyi (ed.): Retracing the past. Historical continuity in aesthetics from a global perspective. International Yearbook of Aesthetics, Volume 19, (2017). Santa Cruz, California: International Association for Aesthetics, 42-53.
SOMHEGYI, Zoltán. (2018). The city as experience and inspiration. Critical reflections on urbanity in contemporary art.” Argument. Biannual Philosophical Journal 8 (2/2018), 257-271.
SOMHEGYI, Zoltán. (2020A). Reviewing the Past. The Presence of Ruins. London-New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
SOMHEGYI, Zoltán. (2020B). “Aesthetic Prospects and Prospects of the Aesthetic: Variations on the Sublime in Natural and Altered Environments.” In: Zoltán Somhegyi and Max Ryynänen (eds.): Aesthetics in Dialogue. Applying Philosophy of Art in a Global World. Berlin: Peter Lang, 289-298.
SWASTIKA, Alia. (2016). “Trauma and Hysteria.” In: Julie Rose (ed.) Jompet Kuswidananto. After Voices. Sydney: Sherman Contemporary Art Foundation, 15-21.
VIVES, Rosa M. (2021). Trilogy about several urban view and landscape prints. Barcelona: Publicacions i Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
Websites of artist and artworks quoted
MAGYAR, Ádám. Urban Flow: http://www.magyaradam.com/wp/?page_id=478 (accessed: 31 March, 2021)
MAGYAR, Ádám. Matter: https://vimeo.com/527234783/e728d8e264 (accessed: 31 March, 2021)
MARCELLE, Cinthia Marcelle and Tiago Mata Machado. O Século: https://vimeo.com/38499578 (accessed: 31 March, 2021)
WOLF, Michael. Architecture of Density: https://photomichaelwolf.com/#architecture-of-densitiy/1 (accessed: 31 March, 2021)
WOLF, Michael. Tokyo Compression: https://photomichaelwolf.com/#tokyo-compression/1 (accessed: 31 March, 2021)
How to Cite
The licence allows: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Author's rights are protected by the ISSN 1139-7365. On the w@terfront has no restrictions respect the copyright by the authors and does allow authors to retain the publishing rights without restrictions.
This journal does not apply any type of charge to the authors for the presentation or processing of the articles.