About the Journal
Focus and Scope
"on the w@terfront" is an interdisciplinary online journal on urban regeneration, public space, urban design, public art and citizen participation.
"on the w@terfront" is aimed at scholars whose research is planned from an interdisciplinary perspective and who are engaged in research on topics related to the journal's own topics. It is also aimed at a more heterogeneous public interested in the journal's own topics.
Guiding keywords
Urban design; Public space; Urban regeneration; Sustainable urban development strategies; Public art; Citizen participation; Urban governance.
Peer Review Process
All research articles published in this journal have undergone a rigorous double-blind peer review, based on an initial selection of editors and an anonymous referee by two anonymous referees. The reviewers will issue a reasoned report on the originals received which will be sent by mail to the authors. When the reviewers recommend the publication of an article provided the author incorporates the improvements indicated, the editorial board will set a delivery deadline for the new version.
In this process the communication can be (1) that the article is rejected especially when it does not conform to the editorial policy of the journal or does not meet the submission requirements; (2) that the article is accepted without modifications; and (3) that the article is accepted with the modifications indicated by the reviewers.
Publication Frequency
Open Access Policy
This journal follows a policy of Open Access, with the aim to contribute to a full democratization of knowledge, to the full establishment of the Knowledge Society and to Lifelong Learning of Global Citizenship. All the article of On the w@terfront are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The licence is (CC BY) as recommended by the Budapest Open Access Initiative taking into account its commitment with Open Access.The indication is expressly stated in each issue.
Declaration of publication ethics and good practices for scientific journals published by the University of Barcelona
Declaration of publishing ethics and best practices for scientific journals published by the University of Barcelona
Approved by the Executive Council on 8 February 2016. Ratified by the Governing Council on 16 April 2016.
The University of Barcelona has taken as a reference the Code of Conduct and good practices for publishers of scientific journals defined by the Committee of Ethics of Publications (COPE).
The University of Barcelona promotes the open access publication of digital journals and endeavours to guarantee quality and conscientiousness in the transfer of scientific knowledge. The University is committed to ensuring that the articles it publishes and the publishing process itself observe the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). It is therefore essential that all of the stakeholders in this process—journal editors, reviewers, technical editors and authors—know and act according to the Code.
Journal editors should
- ensure that the decision to publish is not dependent on the author’s race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnic origin, country of origin, citizenship or political persuasion;
- publish regular updates on the responsibilities of authors, submission requirements, the arbitration system used to select the articles and the evaluation criteria to be applied by reviewers;
- publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed and not make use of any article received for UB-specific research assignments without the author’s consent;
- guarantee confidentiality during the review process, meaning (a) the anonymity of reviewers and authors and the confidentiality of the content of the articles, the reports submitted by reviewers and any other type of correspondence with or between the editorial, consultant and scientific committees and (b) confidentiality in the correspondence between the author and the journal committees or reviewers when the author wishes to clarify, change or complain about some aspect of the article;
- make certain that the integrity of articles already published is respected;
- act swiftly to eliminate from the journal or refuse to publish any article that has been found to plagiarise information from other sources.
- http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_0.pdf
Authors should
- understand that they are responsible for all submitted content;
- notify the journal editors of any errors in their published articles so that the appropriate corrections can be made;
- guarantee that the article and associated materials are original and do not infringe on the rights of third-party authors and, when there are co-authors, guarantee that the consent of all the authors is obtained before the article goes to press.
Reviewers and technical editors should
- apply revisions that are objective, informed, critical, constructive and unbiased, where acceptance or rejection is based only on the work’s relevance, originality, interest to the public in question and compliance with the style and content regulations in the evaluation criteria;
- meet deadlines when this is possible and promptly inform the journal editor when it is not;
- avoid sharing, spreading or reproducing any information from articles still under review without permission from the corresponding journal editors or authors
Sources of Support
- Centre de Recerca POLIS
- Vicenrrectorat de Relacions institucionals, COmunicació i Política Lingüistica. Universitat de Barcelona
Journal History
INDEXED IN:
Emerging Sources Citation Index, SCOPUS (2019). Art Source, Avery, DOAJ, SCI-Expanded. DIALNET
EVALUATED IN:
- CARHUS Plus+ 2018 grupo D
-
Any
Valoració
Àmbit
2018
D
Arts
2014
C
Arts
2010
C
Arts
2008
B/C/D pendent
Arts
- Directory of Open Access Journals,
- LATINDEX (Catálogo)
- DIALNET Arte
-
Año
Posición
Cuartil
2020
C1
2019
C1
2018
C1
2017
C1
- REDIB (Red Iberoamericana de Innovación y Conocimiento Científico) : Arquitectura Q2
-
CIRC : Clasificación Integrada de Revistas Científicas
- Clasificación Ciencias Humanas A
- Clasificación Ciencias Sociales B
METRICS
SJR. SCImago Journal & Country Rank, Scopus Sources
- CiteScore 2021 0.5
- Cite Score Rank
- Visual Arts & Performing Arts #122rank out of 584 Q1 79th percentile
- Social Sciences/ Urban Studies #161/241 Q3 33rd percentile
- Social Sciences/ Geography, Planning and Development #610/747 Q4 18th percentile
- SJR 2021 0.159
JCR. Journal Citation Reports
- ARCHITECTURE - ESCI
-
JCR YEAR
JCI RANK
JCI QUARTILE
JCI PERCENTILE
2021
30/92
Q2
67.93
2020
62/91
Q3
32.42
2019
61/90
Q3
32.78
2018
63/88
Q3
28.98
2017
68/87
Q4
22.41
DIALNET Arte
-
Año
Impacto
2020
0,247
2019
0,182
2018
0,221
2017
0,136
REDIB (Red Iberoamericana de Innovación y Conocimiento Científico)
Year |
Overall Score |
Perc. Normal. Imp. Fac. |
Quartil |
2020 |
20,427 |
83,445 |
Q2 |
2019 |
16,614 |
73,405 |
Q2 |
2018 |
16,527 |
75,096 |
Q2 |
2017 |
20,616 |
90,338 |
Q1 |
OA polices
Dulcinea green, SHERPA/RoMEO colour ungraded