Chandigarh outskirts: urban framework, identity and social utopia. An approach from the perspective of visual arts.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2023.65.02.01

Keywords:

Contemporary art, urban planning and identity, urban periphery, Chandigarh

Abstract

The nature of urban framework is often significant about key aspects of a city’s social, historical or cultural character. The peripheral areas of a city can give us a glimpse of this nature as something in permanent construction or mutation. Interestingly enough, urban peripheries are drawing considerable attention in fields such as social studies, architecture and urban planning or visual arts. Chandigarh city, in India, provides us a case of study certainly interesting. Conceived by Le Cobusier and his team at the middle XXth century, it exemplifies the tension between planned city and non planned urban development. It exemplifies as well some key contemporary controversies about cultural identity, considered from perspectives such as social studies and urban planning. Chandigarh has also been the focus of interesting discussions from the postcolonial perspective: welcomed by many as an urban project with a strong social aim, others consider Le Corbusier experiment as an example of self-imposed foreign modernity. In this paper we will summarize a research conducted with a group of students and professors in the local university, in which visual arts were used to convey reflections about the significance and transformations of the Chandigarh periphery, in the Green Belt area. We will ground this project on the previous experience of many artists that have focused their work on city peripheries. The research will provide evidences in order to evaluate the significance and scope that the project had for the participants.

Author Biography

Albert Macaya, Universitat Rovira i Virgili

Artista visual y profesor de la Universidad Rovira i Virgili. Doctor en Bellas Artes por la Universitat de Barcelona. Ha participado en varios grupos de investigación y programas de doctorado sobre arte, educación y didáctica de las artes visuales. Es autor de diversas publicaciones en estas temáticas. En el ámbito creativo, ha centrado su labor en la escultura y la instalación..

References

ATKINSON, P. y DELAMONT, S. (2008). “Analytic perspectives”, En Denzin, Norman K. y Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.): Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. pp. 285-312. Sage.

ATTLEE, James (2007). Towards Anarchitecture: Gordon Matta-Clark and Le Corbusier. Tate Papers, n.7. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/07/towards-anarchitecture-gordon-matta-clark-and-le-corbusier.

AUGÉ, M. (2000). Los no lugares. Espacios del anonimato. Una antropología de la sobremodernidad. Gedisa.

BARONE, T. y EISNER, E. W. (2012). Arts based research. Sage

BLAKE, P, (1977). Form follows fiasco: Why Modern Architecture Hasn’t Worked. Little, Brown and Co. http://www.gbv.de/dms/hebis-darmstadt/toc/121276236.pdf

BOHIGAS, O. (1963). Barcelona, entre el Pla Cerdà i el barraquisme. Eds. 62.

BOIS, Y. A., y KRAUSS, Rosalind (1996). “A User’s Guide to Entropy”. October, 78, pp. 39-88. DOI:10.2307/778906

BRUNER, J. (1998). Realidad mental y mundos posibles. Gedisa.

CHALANA, M. (2014). “Chandigarh: City and Periphery”. Journal of Planning History, Vol. 14(1) pp. 62-84. DOI: 10.1177/1538513214543904

CHARITONIDOU, M. (2022). “Le Corbusier’s Ineffable Space and Synchronism: From Architecture as Clear Syntax to Architecture as Succession of Events”. Arts 11: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11020048

CLÉMENT, G. (2007). Manifiesto del Tercer paisaje. Gustavo Gili.

CONSTANT (2015). “Otra ciudad para otra vida”. En VV.AA. Constant, Nueva Babilonia. Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía.

DEAN, T. y MILLAR, J. (2005). Art Works: Place. Thames and Hudson, 2005.

DELGADO, M. (2011). El espacio público como ideología. Catarata, 2011.

DENZIN, N. y LINCOLN, Y. S. (eds.) (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Sage.

FITTING, P. (2002). “Urban Planning/Utopian Dreaming: Le Corbusier’s Chandigarh Today.” Utopian Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1 pp. 69-93. DOI: 10.2307/20718410

FRAMPTON, K. (1983). “Prospects for a Critical Regionalism”. Perspecta, Vol. 20, pp. 147-162.

GIEDION, S. (1952). “Historical Background to the Core”. En Tyrwhitt, J., Sert, J. L. y Rogers, E. N. (eds.). The heart of the city: Towards the humanisation of urban life. CIAM 8. Lund Humphries.

HARDY, J. (2009). Scoop-Wallah: Life on a Delhi Daily. Summersdale.

HARPER, D. (2008). “What’s new visually?” En N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (eds.): Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp.185-204). Sage.

HATZFELD, M. (2007). La cultura de los suburbios. Una energía positiva. Laertes.

HARVEY, D. (2007). Espacios del capital. Hacia una geografía crítica. Akal.

HERNÁNDEZ, F. y REVELLES, B. (2019). “La perspectiva post-cualitativa en la investigación educativa: genealogía, movimientos, posibilidades y tensiones.” Educatio Siglo XXI, Vol. 37, nº 2, pp. 11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.387001

INTERNATIONALE LETTRISTE (1954). Les gratte-ciel par la racine. https://monoskop.org/images/1/1b/Potlatch_1_22_Jun_1954.jpg

JACOBS, J. (2020). Muerte y vida de las grandes ciudades. Capitán Swing.

JAHNKASSIM, P. S. y NAWAWI, N. M. (2016) “Allusions to Mughal urban forms in the monumentality of Chandigarh’s capitol complex”, Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 40:3, 177-190, DOI: 10.3846/20297955.2016.1210050

JUNCOSA, P. (ed.) (2011). Josep Lluís Sert. Conversaciones, esritos. Lugares de encuentro para las artes. Gustavo Gili.

KALIA, R. (1987). Chandigarh: In Search of an Identity. Southern Illinois University Press.

KOOLHAAS, R. (2014). Acerca de la ciudad. Bracelona: Gustavo Gili.

LATHER, P. (2013). “Methodology-21: what do we do in the afterward?”, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26:6, pp. 634-645. DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788753

Le CORBUSIER (1952). “The Core as a Meeting Place of the Arts”. En Tyrwhitt, J.; Sert, J.L.; Rogers, E.N. The heart of the city. Towards the humanisation of urban life. Lund Humphries.

Le CORBUSIER (1958). Œuvre complète Vol. 5: 1946-1952 . Editions d’architecture. https://books.google.es/books?id=3T_hzQEACAAJ&dq=%22le+corbusier+oeuvre&hl=es&sa=X&redir_esc=y

Le CORBUSIER (1977). Hacia una arquitectura. Poseidón.

Le CORBUSIER (1985). La ciudad del futuro. Ediciones infinito. https://urbanitasite.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/le-corbusier-la-ciudad-del-futuro.pdf

LEAVY, P. (2009). Method Meets Art. Arts-Based Research Practice. Guilford Press.

LEFEBVRE, H. (2017). El derecho a la ciudad. Capitan Swing.

LEFEBVRE, H. (2013). La producción del espacio. Capitan Swing.

LYNCH, K. (2015). La imagen de la ciudad. Gustavo Gili.

MANNAY, D. (2017). Métodos visuales, narrativos y creativos en investigación cualitativa. Narcea.

MARCHI, L. Z. (2016): “CIAM 8. The Heart of the City as the symbolical resilience of the city”. In Carola Hein (ed.) International Planning History Society Proceedings, 17th IPHS Conference, History-Urbanism-Resilience, TU Delft 17-21 Vol. 2 pp.135-144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7480/iphs.2016.2.1227

McNIFF, S. (ed.) (2013). Art as research. Intellect books.

MUMFORD, L. (2016). The Culture of Cities. Open Road Media

MUÑOZ, F. (2016). “El vacio urbano y la ciudad interrumpida. Para una geografía urbana de los tiempos muertos.” En FERNÁNDEZ, M y GUIFREU, J. El uso temporal de los vacíos urbanos. Diputació de Barcelona. https://urbanitasite.files.wordpress.com/2019/11/el-uso-temporal-de-los-vacc3ados-urbanos.pdf

NORDSTROM, S. N. (2018). “Antimethodology: Postqualitative Generative Conventions.” Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 24(3) pp. 215–226. DOI: 10.1177/1077800417704469

PINK, S. (2014). Doing Sensory Ethnography. Londres: Sage.

PRAKASH, V. (1998). “Inheriting Modernism: Rethinking Chandigarh in the Post-colonial Frame.” Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture International Conference 1998, pp. 187-190. https://www.acsa-arch.org/proceedings/International%20Proceedings/ACSA.Intl.1998/ACSA.Intl.1998.40.pdf

PRO, J. (2021). “La no-utopía de Constant para un tiempo de utopías.” En Constant. Nueva Babilonia. Cáterdra.

QUINTANA, I. y O’BYRNE, C. (2021). “The void in Chandigarh’s Capitol Complex: a legacy at an eastern scale”. LC. Revue de recherches sur Le Corbusier. Nº 3, pp. 28-41. DOI: 10.4995/lc.2020.14233

REMESAR, A. (2021). “La búsqueda del centro.” On the W@terfornt, 63 (8), 3-65. DOI:10.1344/waterfront2021.63.8.01

REMESAR, A. y VERGEL, J. (2020). “Acceder a la gestión de lo simbólico. Un derecho ciudadano.” On the W@terfront, 62 (7), 39-56. DOI: 10.1344/waterfront2020.62.6.11

ROLDÁN, J. Y MARIN, R. (2012). Metodologías artísticas de investigación en educación. Aljibe.

ROTS, S. (2010). «The squatted new town: where do informality and modernism meet?» en International New Town Institute: New towns for the 21st century. Sun.

ROWE, P. G. (1991). Making a Middle Landscape. The MIT Press.

SAID, E. (1991). Orientalisme: identitat, negació i violència. Eumo.

SARIN, M. (2019). Urban Planning in the Third World: The Chandigarh Experience. Routledge.

SENNET, R. (2019). Construir i habitar: Ètica per a la ciutat. Arcadia.

SERT, J. L. (1944). “The Human Scale in City Planning”. En Zucker P. (ed.) New Architecture and City Planning. Philosophical library.

SERT, J. L. (1952). “Centers of Community Life”. en Rogers, E. N., Sert, J. L., Tyrwhitt, J.(eds.). The heart of the city: Towards the humanisation of urban life. CIAM 8 pp. 3–16. Lund Humphries.

SERT, J. L. , LEGER, F. y GIEDION, S. (1943). “Nueve puntos sobre monumentalidad”. Nueva visión. file:///C:/Users/Usuari/Downloads/Dialnet-NinePointsOnMonumentality-5372734.pdf

SHAFIEI, K. (2010). «Urban block fragmentation in spontaneous settlements». En International New Town Institute: New towns for the 21st century. Sun.

SMITHSON, R. (2010). “La entropía se hace visible.” En García-Germán, J. (ed.): De lo mecánico a lo termodinámico: por una definición energética de la arquitectura y del territorio. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

SOLÀ-MORALES, I. (1997). Las formas de crecimiento urbano. Edicions UPC.

SOLÀ-MORALES, I. (2006) Metrópolis: ciudades, redes, paisajes. Gustavo Gili.

SPIVAK, G. C. (1999) A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Harvard University Press.

St. PIERRE, E. A. (2014). “A Brief and Personal History of Post Qualitative Research Toward Post Inquiry”. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing. 30, (2). http://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/viewFile/521/stpierre.pdf

STANLEY, L. y TEMPLE, B. (2008). “Narrative Methodologies: Subjects, Silences, Re-Readings and Analyses.” En J. Goodwin (Ed.): SAGE Biographical Research. Sage.

TYRWHITT, J., SERT, J. L., y ROGERS, E. N. (eds.) (1952). The heart of the city. Towards the humanisation of urban life. London and Bradford. Lund Humphries & Co Ltd.

VAN MANEN, M. (2003). Investigación educativa y experiencia vivida. Ciencia humana para una pedagogía de la acción y de la sensibilidad. Idea Books.

VON MOOS, S. (2021). The Politics of the Open Hand: Notes on Le Corbusier and Nehru at Chandigarh. MIT Press Open Architecture and Urban Studies.

WACQUANT, L. (2007). Pàries urbans. Edicions de 1984.

WIGLEY, M. (2015). “Hospitalidad extrema”. En VV.AA. Constant, Nueva Babilonia. Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía.

Published

2023-02-05 — Updated on 2023-02-12

How to Cite

Macaya, Albert. 2023. “ An Approach from the Perspective of Visual Arts”. on the w@terfront. Public Art.Urban Design.Civic Participation.Urban Regeneration 65 (02):3-42. https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2023.65.02.01.